Monday, October 31, 2016
FINANCIAL PAEDOPHILIA || WARS WITHOUT END FOR WALL STREET'S MERCENARIES' RETIREMENT PORTFOLIOS!?! | CHARLES GRASSLEY | PATRICK LEAHY | JAMES C. DUFF | JASON CHAFFETZ | SIDNEY THOMAS | JAMES COMEY | ROBERT J BRYAN | ET AL
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1LLz-ESkJjDdURjUl8wclZqSVFGaGM2a09MVGFaaDlYbDNV/view?usp=sharing
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/02/louis-brandeis-zionism-parushim-et.html
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2015/02/federal-reserve-system-bank-failure.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/is-a-war-in-the-making-a-third-world-war-instigated-by-a-declining-imperial-power/5554027
IMPEACHMENT FAX: ROBERT J BRYAN TO BE POSTED W/IN THE NEXT THREE TO SEVEN (3-7) DAYS
Sunday, October 30, 2016
Bank of America & The Vatican & The Jesuits Et Al (1 published 11/14/13)
Jesuits Own 51% of the Bank of America
Last night on the chat, I posted information about the Bank of
America is 51% Jesuit-owned. Phil wanted to know where I got this
information from. Here it is, guys
http://letsrollforums.com/jesuits-own-51-bank-t18623.html?s=c2183597be001ec95c6db44c93aa522b&
"The influence of the Society of Jesus on the American financial sector became visible first 50 years ago, when the italian Finacier A.P. Gianni [A Knight of Malta, as reported by mainstream paper SFGate] founded the Bank of California, which is today, under the changed name 'Bank of America, one of the biggest banks on the planet.
Gianni was a very clever financier who owns his seed capital to the Jesuits and worked as their delegate or stooge. Today the Bank of America belongs to 51% to the Order [of the Jesuits]'"
http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mi...?showtopic=7641
The Unhived Mind is quoting a Der Spiegel report from 1958. You can see the information on A.P. Gianni (Bank of America founder) being a Knight of Malta at our friend DutchPhil's site: http://moversandshakersofthesmom.blo...-giannini.html
The Executive Vice President of the Bank of America was Jesuit-trained at Canisius College: http://www.canisius.edu/alumni/magaz...over_story.pdf
"The influence of the Society of Jesus on the American financial sector became visible first 50 years ago, when the italian Finacier A.P. Gianni [A Knight of Malta, as reported by mainstream paper SFGate] founded the Bank of California, which is today, under the changed name 'Bank of America, one of the biggest banks on the planet.
Gianni was a very clever financier who owns his seed capital to the Jesuits and worked as their delegate or stooge. Today the Bank of America belongs to 51% to the Order [of the Jesuits]'"
http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mi...?showtopic=7641
The Unhived Mind is quoting a Der Spiegel report from 1958. You can see the information on A.P. Gianni (Bank of America founder) being a Knight of Malta at our friend DutchPhil's site: http://moversandshakersofthesmom.blo...-giannini.html
The Executive Vice President of the Bank of America was Jesuit-trained at Canisius College: http://www.canisius.edu/alumni/magaz...over_story.pdf
from
WikiCompany Website
recovered through
WayBackMachine Website
"The very word secrecy is repugnant, in a free and open society. For we are, as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret proceedings and to secret oaths"..."For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence - on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined.Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."
- John F. Kennedysecret society speech on April 27, 1961(murdered on November 22, 1963).
Introduction
The Jesuit Order is an almost 500-year old covert operations, geo-political, male-only organization, structured as a secret military operation:
demanding secret oaths and complete obedience to each direct superior, which is ultimately the Superior General (often nicknamed as the Black Pope, since he dresses in black and 'stands in the shadow' of the white Pope).
The "Society of Jesus" - as they are officially known - was originally used
by the Vatican to counter the various Reformation movements in Europe, to
which the Vatican lost much of its religious and political power.
Absolute-temporal-ruling power has always been the Vatican institution's primary
objective.
The Jesuit Order is since 1814 in complete control of the - obscenely wealthy - Vatican institution (and its Catholic clergy hierarchy) and presently also controls various other organizations together with the Military Order of Malta, such as:
The Jesuit Order is since 1814 in complete control of the - obscenely wealthy - Vatican institution (and its Catholic clergy hierarchy) and presently also controls various other organizations together with the Military Order of Malta, such as:
the United Nations NATO European Commission big corporations secret services numerous societies and cults, such as Freemasonry ("The Brotherhood") and Opus Dei
265th Pope Joseph Ratzinger and 30th Jesuit General Adolfo Nicolás.
|
35th Jesuit general
congregation at the Vatican in 2008
|
Saint Peter's Square in
Vatican City
|
Saturday, October 29, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | WESTERN DISTRICT AT TACOME | ROBERT J. BRYAN | CHARLES GRASSLEY | PATRICK LEAHY | JAMES DUFF | JASON CHAFFETZ | ET AL
>>https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1LLz-ESkJjDYUlrRlZkZXhua0xlNzdNd2EyZFQ2M1dDTUdn/view?usp=sharing<<
Mr. Bryan does not honor due process law, furthermore, he does not exactly tell the whole truth. The link below is about the date that I certainly more likely than not FAXED to Mr. Bryan's Fax Number the document (TO BE POSTED), which DEMANDS HIS IMPEACHMENT.
Clearly, his cannot be other than biased in his decisions. TO BE IMMEDIATELY APPEALED.
Mr. Bryan does not honor due process law, furthermore, he does not exactly tell the whole truth. The link below is about the date that I certainly more likely than not FAXED to Mr. Bryan's Fax Number the document (TO BE POSTED), which DEMANDS HIS IMPEACHMENT.
Clearly, his cannot be other than biased in his decisions. TO BE IMMEDIATELY APPEALED.
Robert J. Bryan
WSBA Number: | 2134 |
Admit Date: | 03/05/1959 |
Member Status: | Judicial |
Public/Mailing Address: | US District Court
1717 Pacific Ave Rm 4427 Tacoma, WA 98402-3224 United States |
Phone: | (253) 882-3870 |
Fax: | (253) 882-3871 |
TDD: | |
Email: | |
Website: |
Practice Information Back to top
Firm or Employer: | US District Court | ||
|
HILLARY POTUS #45 & BILL = HILL BILLY CLINTONS! | DONALD TRUMP | WALL STREET | BILDERBERGERS | FINANCIAL GLOBAL MAFIA | IS IT REALLY THE END OF THE WORLD | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | ELECTION 2016 | POTUSES CLINTONS & THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Sunday, October 23, 2016
FINANCIAL MAFIA INTERNATIONAL | FINANCIAL MARTIAL LAW USA | POTUS 45 2016 AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Gary Lynch, BANK OF AMERICA |
>>https://www.c-span.org/person/?gregorypalm<< | ||
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-14/what-top-bank-lawyers-were-doing-at-secret-versailles-summit<< |
How did so many D rated Human Beings get to imprison the planet with the most vile imaginations and whats with the LAWYER profile?
Then we also have to say the PhD, JD, MD and WU WEI
HOW DO WE SPELL THE WORD DESCRIBING OUR LEADERS IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER?! CAREER CRIMINALS IN THE BUSINESS OF EARTH'S MOST UNNATURAL GESTAPO GULAG NWO |
Saturday, October 22, 2016
CLINTONS | TRUMP | NEW WORLD ORDER | CAPITALISM CHAINS THE PLANET EARTH AND ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME
In the I Ching ~ The Book of Changes and the Unchanging Truth version via Hua Ching NI, NATURE can't be other than the power which all human beings are simply an integral part of, growing the force of the Dragon and Phoenix (Yang - Yin);
SOOOOO, what can be said about all the earth people uniting and getting rid of the chains that are bondage, such as the unnatural capitalistic agenda which keeps the bees buzzing in the brains as cognitive dissonance ... CAN WE embrace create receive balance?
May we at least given the opportunity for our MINDS to all stay focused in the create receive balance until we see the change we know as reality?
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
USA POTUS DISORDERS
Rodrigo Duterte to New World Order agents: “I’ll humiliate you” By Jonas E. Alexis on October 18, 2016
If Rodrigo Duterte had
already decided to “cross the Rubicon” by giving Russia and China the
nod and by giving up on the Zionist States of America, then New World
Order agents will have a hard time articulating their lies and
fabrications in the Philippines and much of Asia.
ECONOMICS 101 USA | WAR
«Economic sanctions» or the white-collar war
The
United States and the European Union have launched an undeclared war
against Syria, Iran and Russia – it is known by the alias «economic
sanctions». This appalling tactic killed more than a million Iraqis
during the 1990’s, without arousing any suspicion in Western public
opinion. It is used today, patiently, against any state which refuses to
be dominated by the unipolar world order.
In the past, conventional war strategy included the
siege of a city or a state. It was used to isolate the enemy, to prevent
him from using his resources, to submit him to famine, and finally to
gain victory. In Europe, the Catholic church firmly condemned this
tactic as criminal, in that it killed civilians first, and the military
forces only afterwards.
It is probable that several of the states which voted for these sanctions were not aware of their extent nor their consequences. What is certain is that when some members of the Security Council asked for the sanctions to be lifted, the United States and the United Kingdom opposed the motion, thereby assuming the responsibility for a million dead civlians.
After numerous international civil servants had been fired for their participation in the massacre of a million Iraqi civilians, the United Nations began to think about the manner in which they could make the sanctions more effective in terms of the objectives announced. In other words, to ensure that the sanctions would effect only the political and military sectors, and not civilians. There was talk of «targeted sanctions».However, despite much research on the subject, no-one has ever practised sanctions against a state which affected its leaders and not its population.
The effect of sanctions is linked to the interpretation that the governments make of the texts which define them. For example, most of the texts evoke sanctions on products which may be used both by civilians and the military, which leaves plenty of room for interpretation. A rifle may be forbidden for export to a certain state because it can be used for war as well as hunting. But a bottle of water can be drunk by a mother as well as a soldier. Consequently, the same texts – according to the political circumstances and the evolution of the government’s will – can lead to extremely different results.
The situation is all the more complicated in that the legal sanctions of the Security Council are augmented by the illegal sanctions of the United States and the European Union. Indeed, while some states or intergovernmental institutions can legally refuse commercial relations with other states, they can not establish unilateral sanctions without waging war.
The term «sanction» gives the impression that the state which is submitted to them has committed a crime, and that it has been tried before being found guilty. This is true for sanctions decreed by the Security Council, but not those decided unilaterally by the United States and the European Union. These are purely and simply acts of war.
After the war against the British in 1812, Washington created the Office of Foreign Assets Control, which is tasked with waging this white-collar war.
Currently, the main states which are victims of sanctions are not the targets of the United Nations, but exclusively those of the United States and the European Union. They are Syria, Iran and Russia. That is to say the three states which are fighting the jihadists supported by the Western powers.
Most of the sanctions that have been decreed are without direct links to the contemporary war against Syria. The sanctions aimed at Damascus are mainly linked to its support for the Lebanese Hezbollah, and to the asylum granted to the Palestinian Hamas (which has since joined the Muslim Brotherhood, and is now fighting against Syria). The sanctions against Iran were allegedly imposed against its military nuclear programme, even though it was closed down by the Ayatollah Khomeiny thirty years ago. They continue to be levied despite the signature of the 5+1 agreement, which was supposed to resolve this problem, which does not in fact exist. Those levied against Russia sanction the incorporation of Crimea after it had refused the Nazi coup d’état in Kiev, qualified as a «democratic revolution» by NATO.
The most rigourous sanctions currently levied are those affecting Syria. A report drawn up by the UN Office for the Coordinaton of Humanitarian Affairs in Syria, financed by the Swiss Confederation, and made public four months ago, observes that the US and European interpretation of the texts leads to the deprivation, for the majority of Syrians, of many medical care products and also food resources. A great number of medical products are forbidden, since they are considered to be of double usage, and it is impossible to pay for the importation of food via the international banking system.
Although the situation of the Syrian people is not as catastrophic as that of the Iraqis in the 1990’s, it is nonetheless a war waged by the United States and the European Union, by financial and economic means, exclusively against the population living under the protection of the Syrian Arab Republic – with intent to kill. Thierry Meyssan || Translation Pete Kimberley
http://www.voltairenet.org/article193738.html <<
>>https://auggiecoupdblog.wordpress.com/2016/10/18/false-flag-alaskan-residents-russian-invasion/
Sunday, October 16, 2016
CLINTON | TRUMP | UNITED STATES LOST ITS GLORY HALLELUJAH
Richard Nixon tied the sales of oil to the US Dollar <PETRO DOLLAR / PETRO$> and that made all the earth people pay the United States of America to have oil, petroleum. That was quite a trick on Mother Nature alright.
But, before that Louis Brandeis penned in the Federal Reserve System and caused the USA to be enslaved to a system which was an abomination to Mother Nature.
Mother Nature isn't pleased with the creation of the species Homo Sapiens / Human Beings.
The MONSTERS that own the Planet Earth via causing Mother Nature to be slowly but, surely destroyed is not being ignored via Mother Nature.
Soon, the CREATIVE and the RECEPTIVE (Yang Yin) are going to bring balance into the Feng Shui Point, and then all the Humans that have violated Nature are going to realize the true power in this universe and all universes known and unknown.
There is no better time than the present to ATONE before the time is too late.
Sleeping state is an awakened consciousness level: Sleep, and say as this energy happens that the alpha beta delta theta (not to the death point in theta) levels are reached and the understanding of all understanding is understood, DREAM and in the dream state >> lucid, profound understanding that is consciousness which the divine power gives to all energy in the energy of what it is ... life, nature, we are not separate and so those that are monsters must be brought into the still point of the unseen and held accountable for the imbalances of all that has been. To be continued ...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-elephant-in-the-room-what-trump-clinton-and-even-stein-are-missing/5551313
Sunday, October 9, 2016
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
CHINA RISING IS NOT GOING TO FALL
The Eurasian Century is Now Unstoppable
I
recently returned from a fascinating two week speaking tour in China.
The occasion was the international premier of my newest book, One Belt,
One Road–China and the New Eurasian Century. In the course of my visit I
was invited by China’s Northwest University in Xi’an to give a lecture
and seminar on the present global political and economic situation in
the context of China’s New Economic Silk Road as the One Belt, One Road
project is often called. What I’ve seen in my many visits to China, and
have studied about the entirety of this enormously impressive
international infrastructure project convinces me that a Eurasian
Century at this point is unstoppable.
The idiotic wars of the Washington
war-hawks and their military industry–in Syria, in Ukraine, Libya, Iraq
and now the South China Sea provocations against China–are not going to
stop what is now clearly the most impressive and economically altering
project in more than a century.
The term “American Century” was
triumphantly proclaimed in a famous editorial in Life magazine in 1941
in the early phase of World War II, before the United States had even
entered the war, to describe the system publisher Henry Luce saw
dominating the postwar world after the fall of the rival British Empire.
The American Century has lasted a mere
seven decades if we date from the end of the war. Its record has been
one of dismal failure on balance. The industrial base of the United
States, the predominant leading industrial nation and leading scientific
innovator, today is a hollowed, rotted shell with once-booming cities
like Detroit or Philadelphia or Los Angeles now burned-out ghettos of
unemployed and homeless.
The Federal Debt of the United States,
owing to the endless wars its Presidents engage in, as well as the
fruitless bailouts of Wall Street banks and Government Sponsored
Enterprises like Fannie Mae, is well over 103% of GDP at an astonishing
$19.5 trillion, or more than $163,000 per taxpaying American and
Washington is adding to the debt this year at near $600 billion.
Countries like China and Russia are moving away from subsidizing that
debt at a record pace.
America’s economic basic
infrastructure–bridges, sewer and water treatment plants, electric grid,
railways, highways–have been neglected for more than four decades for a
variety of reasons. The American Society of Civil Engineers recently
estimated that gross domestic product will be reduced by $4 trillion
between 2016 and 2025 because of lost business sales, rising costs and
reduced incomes if the country continues to underinvest in its
infrastructure. That is on top of the fact that they estimate the
country at present urgently requires new infrastructure investment of
$3.3 trillion by the coming decade just to renew.
Yet US states and cities are not able to
finance such an investment in the future in the present debt situation,
nor is the debt-choked Federal Government, so long as a cartel of
corrupt brain-dead Wall Street banks and financial funds hold America to
ransom. This is the sunset for the American Century, a poorly disguised
imperial experiment in hubris and arrogance by a gaggle of boring old
patriarchs like David Rockefeller and his friends on Wall Street and in
the military industry. It is the starkest contrast to what is going on
to the east, across all Eurasia today.
Flowing the Thought to Transform
The Eurasian Century is the name I give
to the economic emergence of the countries contiguous from China across
Central Asia, Russia, Belarus, Iran and potentially Turkey. They are
being integrally linked through the largest public infrastructure
projects in modern history, in fact the most ambitious ever, largely
concentrated on the 2013 initiative by Chinese President Xi Jinping
called the One Belt, One Road initiative or OBOR. The project and its
implications for Europe and the rest of the world economy have been so
far greeted in the west with a stone silence that defies explanation.
It’s been now three years that have
transpired since then-new Chinese President Xi Jinping made one of his
first foreign visits to Kazakhstan where he discussed the idea of
building a vast, modern network of high-speed train lines crossing the
vast Eurasian land space from the Pacific coast of China and Russia
through Central Asia into Iran, into the states of the Eurasian Economic
Union, principally Russia and potentially on to the select states of
the European Union. That initial proposal was unveiled in detail last
year by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), China’s
economic planning organization, and the ministries of Foreign Affairs
and Commerce.
It’s a useful point to look now more
closely at what has transpired to date. It reveals most impressive
developments, more because the development process is creative and
organic. The great project is no simple blueprint made by the Central
Committee of the Communist Party of China and then simply imposed, top
down, across the so-far 60 countries of Eurasia and South East Asia.
An international conference was recently
held in Xi’an, origin of the ancient version of One Belt, One Road,
namely the Silk Road. The purpose of the international gathering was to
review what has so far taken place. It’s fascinating, notably, in the
care that’s being taken by China to do it in a different way, as
indications so far are, different from the way American Robber Barons
like Cornelius Vanderbilt, E.H. Harriman, Jay Gould or Russell Sage
built rail monopolies and deluded and defrauded investors with railroad
monopolies more than a century ago.
The seminar, titled the Belt and Road
Initiative (BRI): Shared Memory and Common Development, on September
26th, brought together over 400 participants from more than 30 countries
including government officials, universities, corporations, think tanks
and media.
A key role is being played by Renmin
University of China’s Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies to
identify progress and problems of the OBOR project. Their report in
Xi’an presented principles underlying the OBOR international project: It
adheres to the principles of the UN Charter; it is completely open for
new participant nations to cooperate; it will follow market rules and
seek mutual benefit of participating countries.
Those are noble words. What’s more
interesting is the flow process underway to realize such words and to
build the mammoth game-changing infrastructure.
Notably, China’s Xi Jinping decided to
encourage input from sources other than the state central planning
agency or the Communist Party for the complex OBOR. He encouraged
creation of private and independent think-tanks to become a source of
new creative ideas and approaches. Today there is a Chinese Think Tank
Cooperation Alliance group coordinating efforts around OBOR headed by
the dean of the Renmin University. In turn they partner with think tanks
along the OBOR route including think tanks in Iran, Turkey, India,
Nepal, Kazakhstan and other countries.
There will be two main routes of the
OBOR. On land there are several routes or corridors in work. The
Initiative will focus on jointly building what is being called a new
Eurasian Land Bridge from China via Kazakhstan on to Rotterdam. Other
OBOR land rail corridors include developing China-Mongolia-Russia,
China-Central Asia-West Asia, China-Pakistan,
Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar, and China-Indochina Peninsula economic
corridors.v This is huge.
It will build on international transport
routes, relying on core cities along the OBOR route and using key
economic industrial parks as “cooperation platforms.” At sea, the
Initiative will focus on jointly building smooth, secure and efficient
transport routes connecting major sea ports along the “Belt and Road”
including modern upgraded super port construction that will link present
China ports at Haikou and Fujian with Kuala Lumpur’s port in Malaysia
at the Malacca Strait passage, Calcutta in India, Nairobi in Kenya and
via the Suez Canal to Athens and beyond. Crucial is that land and sea
parts of OBOR are seen as one whole circulatory system or flow of trade.
The OBOR Initiative will link key Eurasian ports with interior rail and pipeline infrastructure in a way not before seen.
To date China has signed memoranda of
understanding with 56 countries and regional organizations regarding
OBOR. Since his initial proposal in 2013, President Xi Jinping has
personally visited 37 countries to discuss implementation of OBOR. China
Railway Group and China Communications Construction Company have signed
contracts for key routes and ports in 26 countries. Power plants,
electricity transmission facilities and oil and gas pipelines, covering
19 countries along the “Belt and Road” in some 40 energy projects have
begun. China Unicom, China Telecom and China Mobile are speeding up
cross-border transmission projects in countries along the “Belt and
Road” to expand international telecommunication infrastructure.
Already, taking the full sea and land
routes of OBOR, some $3 trillion of China trade since June 2013 has
flowed over the route, more than a quarter of China’s total trade
volume. To date China has also invested more than $51 billion in the
countries along the present OBOR route. The new land rail routes will
greatly reduce transportation costs across Eurasia, enable formerly
isolated regions to connect efficiently to sea and land markets and
ignite tremendous new economic growth across Eurasia.
The effects of the OBOR are already
beginning to appear. Earlier this year an Iranian container ship arrived
at Qinzhou Port in China with 978 containers from several countries
along the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road opening the first shipping
route linking the Middle East and the Beibu Gulf or Gulf of Tonkin in
Vietnamese. In February 2016 a container train with Chinese goods took
only 14 days to complete the 5,900 mile (9,500km) journey from China’s
eastern Zhejiang province through Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. That was
30 days shorter than the sea voyage from Shanghai to the Iranian port of
Bandar Abbas, according to the head of the Iranian railway company.
China and Iran, now formally part of the OBOR, have targeted bilateral
trade, none in US dollars by the way, to exceed $600 billion in the
coming decade.
China is presently in negotiations with
28 countries China is in talks with 28 countries including Russia, on
high-speed rail projects, China’s train maker, China CNR reports.
It includes a major joint China-Russia
$15 billion high-speed Kazan to Moscow line. The 770 kilometers of track
between Moscow and Russia’s Tatarstan capital, Kazan, will cut time for
the journey from 12 hours now to just 3.5 hours. China has agreed to
invest $6 billion in the project which would become a part of a $100
billion high-speed railway between Moscow and Beijing.
Notably, for the new high-speed track
being laid, China is developing a new generation of trains capable of
reaching speeds of 400 kilometers per hour. And the new trains will
solve the costly rail gauge switching problem between China rails and
Russian. Trains in Russia run on a 1520mm track, compared to the
narrower 1435mm track used in Europe and China. Jia Limin, the head of
China’s high-speed rail innovation program told China Daily that, “The
train… will have wheels that can be adjusted to fit various gauges on
other countries’ tracks, compared with trains now that need to have
their wheels changed before entering foreign systems.”
Given its strategy of building thousands of kilometers of high-speed
railways and developing its domestic Chinese rail sock manufacture as
well as other rail technology, China today is the world’s leading
producer of rail technology.
Financing the moving
Impressive is that China has secured
capital commitment for the OBOR from various sources including the China
Development Bank, Export-Import Bank of China, the China-initiated
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the BRICS New Development Bank and
other sources including its Silk Road Fund to finance the huge
undertaking. The Silk Road Fund has posted $40 billion to fund the OBOR
projects. So far close to a quarter trillion US dollars of ready money
and another half trillion in supranational institutional working capital
is reasonably within reach.
The Western doomsday reports of China’s
economy going down the tubes are simply either self-serving propaganda
of hedge funds or speculators or fed by lack of understanding of the
profound transformation in the entire structure of not only China’s but
all Eurasia’s economy through the One Belt One Road initiative. China is
undergoing a major transformation from a cheap-labor screwdriver
assembly nation to a high-value-added high-tech manufacturer.
Geopolitical transformation
The One Belt, One Road initiative of Xi
Jinping and the Eurasian partners, especially Russia, also has strategic
dimensions of major import. The construction of new infrastructure
corridors spanning across the Eurasian landmass in the form of highways,
railways, industrial parks, and oil and gas pipelines, OBOR is
connecting for the first time in the modern era landlocked regions of
hinterland China and Russia and Central Asia republics with the sea
ports. Linking key Eurasian industrial hubs to ports with efficient
transportation will revolutionize connectivity of hinterland industrial
products and raw materials of every kind. The Russian and Eurasian
lands, including China, contain perhaps the richest untapped
concentration of every raw material known.
The One Belt, One Road also includes oil
and gas pipeline transportation corridors. In January 2015 the
Myanmar-China Pipeline project, 2400 km long, was completed, linking
Myanmar’s deep-water port of Kyaukphyu on Maday Island in the Bay of
Bengal with Kunming in Yunnan province in southeast China near Myanmar’s
border. It’s a joint project of the China Development Bank and Myanmar
Foreign Investment Bank. The new pipeline allows China to import up to
400,000 barrels a day of Middle East oil over a route 1100 km shorter
than the previous Malacca Strait sea route, reducing time to reach the
large industrial hub city of Kunming by 30%, major economic gains, and
avoiding the strategic chokepoint of the Malacca Strait where the US
Navy’s Sixth Fleet dominates.
Previously, 80% of Chinese oil and gas
imports crossed the Malacca straits and were subject to US controls.
Were the present escalating tensions between Washington and China over
the South China Sea or other issues to escalate, China would be brought
to her knees much like Japan prior to declaring war in 1941, when the
USA embargoed her oil. A second pipeline brings natural gas from Qatar
and Myanmar gas fields to China.
The OBOR includes oil and gas pipelines that reduce time and distance to imports of Middle East oil and gas.
China will pay $53 billion to Myanmar in
pipeline royalties over 30 years. They will also invest $25 million in
schooling and other social development projects along the pipeline and
10% of the gas will stay in Burma.
Mackinder Outflanked?
The totality of the strategy behind Xi
Jinping’s Eurasian One belt, One Road rail, sea and pipeline initiative,
which is moving quietly and impressively forward, is transforming the
world geopolitical map. In 1904 a British geographer, Sir Halford
Mackinder, a fervid champion of the British Empire, unveiled a brilliant
concept in a speech to the London Royal Geographical Society titled the
Geographical Pivot of History. That essay has shaped both British and
American global strategy of hegemony and domination to the present. It
was complemented by US Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan’s 1890 work, The
Influence of Sea Power Upon History, which advocated “sea power,”
stating that nations with domination of the seas, as the British Empire
or later the USA, would dominate the world.
The One Belt, One Road, by linking all
the contiguous land areas of Eurasia to the related network of strategic
new or enlarged deep-water ports of OBOR’s Maritime Silk Road, has
rendered US geopolitical strategy a devastating blow at a time the
hegemony of America is failing as never in its short history. The
Eurasian Century today is inevitable and unstoppable. Built on different
principles of cooperation rather than domination, it just might offer a
model for the bankrupt United States and the soon-bankrupt European
Union, to build up true prosperity not based on looting and debt
slavery.
F. William Engdahl is
strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics
from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and
geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
Monday, October 3, 2016
TRICKLE DOWN THEORY ~ THE PRINCIPLE THAT THE POOR, WHO MUST SUBSIST ON TABLE SCRAPS DROPPED BY THE RICH, CAN BEST BE SERVED BY GIVING THE RICH BIGGER MEALS ~ WILLIAM BLUM
William Blum |
The Anti-Empire Report #145, William Blum
– Published October 2nd, 2016
Cold War, today, tomorrow, every day till the end of the world.
“Russia suspected of election scheme. U.S. probes plan to sow voter distrust.”That’s the Washington Post page-one lead headline of September 6. Think about it. The election that Americans are suffering through, cringing in embarrassment, making them think of moving abroad, renouncing their citizenship; an election causing the Founding Fathers to throw up as they turn in their graves … this is because the Russian Devils are sowing voter distrust! Who knew?
But of course, that’s the way Commies are – Oh wait, I forgot, they’re no longer Commies. So what are they? Ah yes, they still have that awful old hangup so worthy of condemnation by decent people everywhere – They want to stand in the way of American world domination. The nerve!
The first Cold War performed a lobotomy on Americans, replacing brain matter with anti-communist viral matter, producing more than 70 years of functional national stupidity.
For all of you who missed this fun event there’s good news: Cold War Two is here, as big and as stupid as ever. Russia and Vladimir Putin are repeatedly, and automatically, blamed for all manner of bad things. The story which follows the above Washington Post headline does not even bother to make up something that could pass for evidence of the claim. The newspaper just makes the claim, at the same time pointing out that “the intelligence community is not saying it has ‘definitive proof’ of such tampering, or any Russian plans to do so.” But the page-one headline has already served its purpose.
Hillary Clinton in her debate with Donald Trump likewise accused Russia of all kinds of computer hacking. Even Trump, not usually a stickler for accuracy, challenged her to offer something along the lines of evidence. She had nothing to offer.
In any event, this is all a diversion. It’s not hacking per se that bothers the establishment; it’s the revelations of their lies that drives them up the wall. The hack of the Democratic National Committee on the eve of the party’s convention disclosed a number of embarrassing internal emails, forcing the resignation of DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
On September 12 we could read in the Post that a well-known physician had called for Clinton to be checked for possible poisons afer her collapse in New York. Said the good doctor: “I do not trust Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump. With those two all things are possible.”
Numerous other examples could be given here of the Post’s near-juvenile anti-Russian bias. One of the most common subjects has been Crimea. Moscow’s “invasion” of the Crimean peninsula in Ukraine in February 2014 is repeatedly cited as proof of Moscow’s belligerent and expansionist foreign policy and the need for Washington to once again feed the defense-budget monster. But we’re never reminded that Russia was reacting to a US-supported coup that overthrew the democratically-elected government of Ukraine on Russia’s border and replaced it with a regime in which neo-Nazis, complete with swastikas, feel very much at home. Russia “invaded” to assist Eastern Ukrainians in their resistance to this government, and did not even cross the border inasmuch as Russia already had a military base in Ukraine.
NATO (= USA) has been surrounding Russia for decades. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov captured the exquisite shamelessness of this with his remark of September 27, 2014: “Excuse us for our existence in the middle of your bases.”
By contrast here is US Secretary of State, John Kerry: “NATO is not a threat to anyone. It is a defensive alliance. It is simply meant to provide security. It is not focused on Russia or anyone else.”
NATO war games in these areas are frequent, almost constant. The encirclement of Russia is about complete except for Georgia and Ukraine. In June, Germany’s foreign minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, shockingly accused NATO of “war-mongering” against Russia. How would the United States react to a Russian coup in Mexico or Canada followed by Russian military exercises in the same area?
Since the end of Cold War One, NATO has been feverishly searching for a reason to justify its existence. Their problem can be summed up with this question: If NATO had never existed what argument could be given now to create it?
The unmitigated arrogance of US policy in Ukraine was best epitomized by the now-famous remark of Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary at the State Department, reacting to possible European Union objection to Washington’s role in Ukraine: “Fuck the EU”, she charmingly declared.
Unlike the United States, Russia does not seek world domination, nor even domination of Ukraine, which Moscow could easily accomplish if it wished. Neither did the Soviet Union set out to dominate Eastern Europe post-World War II. It must be remembered that Eastern Europe became communist because Hitler, with the approval of the West, used it as a highway to reach the Soviet Union to wipe out Bolshevism forever; and that the Russians in World Wars I and II lost about 40 million people because the West had twice used this highway to invade Russia. It should not be surprising that after World War II the Soviets were determined to close down the highway.
The Washington Post’s campaign to depict Russia as the enemy is unrelenting. Again, on the 19th, we could read in the paper the following: “U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies are investigating what they see as a broad covert Russian operation in the United States to sow public distrust in the upcoming presidential election and in U.S. political institutions, intelligence and congressional officials said.”
Nothing, however, compares with President Obama’s speech to the UN General Assembly (September 24, 2014) where he classified Russia to be one of the three threats to the world along with the Islamic State and ebola.
A war between nuclear-powered United States and nuclear- powered Russia is “unthinkable”. Except that American military men think about it, like Cold-War US General Thomas Power, speaking about nuclear war or a first strike by the US: “The whole idea is to kill the bastards! At the end of the war, if there are two Americans and one Russian, we win!” The response from one of those present was: “Well, you’d better make sure that they’re a man and a woman.”
Responses from the Left to my attacks on radical Islam
It’s not my intention here to resume the heated discussion about my recent articles calling for the destruction of ISIS, which led numerous of my readers to criticize me, some 50 of whom asked to be removed from my mailing list, but I hope that many will find the following summary of their stated or implied objections of interest:- They are religious enough to resent what they detect as my less-than-fervent religious bent.
- They refuse to acknowledge any Islamic motivation or context for
ISIS, labeling ISIS as no more than US/Israeli/Saudi mercenaries – end
of discussion. Or Salafi or Wahhabi sects – not really Islamic, they
insist. Islam is thus spared from any contamination.
- They resent my not making a clear enough distinction between ISIS
and Islam in general, being particularly annoyed by my use of the term
“radical Islam” or “Islamic terrorism”. (I pointed out that the West
commonly, and correctly, associated Stern/Irgun terrorism with Jews and
IRA terrorism with Catholics.)
For the record I am condemning those Muslims who engage in suicide bombings, stabbings and other acts of murderous jihad, those who extol and teach the glory and heavenly rewards for such acts, and those who preach that all non-Muslims are infidels and the enemy. In this context it’s no excuse to cite the various acts of horror carried out by the US or the West, particularly when the jihadists’ targets (restaurants, theatres, stores, passersby, etc.) usually have nothing at all to do with Western imperialism.
- They are annoyed that I don’t mention the usual list of US
atrocities in the Middle East as being responsible for all of radical
Islam’s horrors, which are seen as simple retaliation. (See part 3
above.)
- They hate US foreign policy even more than I do, a sentiment I hadn’t known was so common, or even possible.
- I supported the use of US military force against ISIS and their ilk, a terrible black mark against me inasmuch as such force is regarded by leftists as the original sin and cannot conceivably be used for a good end. But the US “accidental” bombing of Syrian troops September 16, killing and wounding about 160, clearly lends credence to my critics.
The US election
On more than one occasion during the recent US primary campaign, Senator Bernie Sanders was asked if he would run on a third-party ticket if he failed to win the Democratic nomination. His reply was a form of the following: “If it happens that I do not win that process, would I run outside of the system? No, I made the promise that I would not, and I’ll keep that promise. And let me add to that:And the reason for that is I do not want to be responsible for electing some right-wing Republican to be president of the United States of America.”
So instead he’s going to be responsible for electing some right-wing Democrat to be president of the United States of America. It’s certainly debatable who’s more right wing, Clinton or Trump. Clinton surely earns that honor on foreign policy. Think of Syria, Iraq, Honduras, Yugoslavia, Libya … et al.
The revelation that the Democratic Party was secretly favoring Clinton over Sanders is reason enough for Sanders to have broken his promise and accepted the offer of the Green Party to be their candidate.
“Qualified” is a word one hears often in this campaign. Hillary, we’re told, is eminently so, Donald is outstandingly un-. But what does the word mean in this context? If a candidate doesn’t share your opinion on most of the crucial issues, who cares if she or he is “qualified”? Conversely, if a candidate shares your opinion on most of the crucial issues, should you be concerned that she or he is “unqualified”?
Reason number 39,457 to give up on capitalism
Macy’s, one of the leading department stores in the United States, has announced it is closing 100 of its stores. Just think of all that was involved in creating each of those stores, from design and building to filling it with staff and goods; all soon to be gone, leaving empty shells of buildings, eyesores for the neighborhoods, thousands of lost jobs … all because a certain net-profit goal was not met.Such a waste. So many empty stores, and at the same time so many unemployed people.
Not far from so many empty houses, and at the same time so many homeless people.
Can it be imagined that an American president would openly implore the nation’s young people to fight a foreign war to defend “capitalism”?
https://williamblum.org/aer/read/145