>>CLICK>>http://freebarrettbrown.org/ |
rown is not a household name like Edward Snowden or Bradley Manning. But after helping expose a dirty tricks plot, he faces jail>>
Any attempt to rein in the vast US surveillance apparatus exposed by Edward Snowden's whistleblowing will be for naught unless government and corporations alike are subject to greater oversight. The case of journalist and activist Barrett Brown is a case in point.
Brown made a splash in February 2011 by helping to uncover "Team Themis",
a project by intelligence contractors retained by Bank of America to
demolish the hacker society known as Anonymous and silence sympathetic
journalists like Glenn Greenwald (now with the Guardian, though then
with Salon). The campaign reportedly involved a menagerie of
contractors: Booz Allen Hamilton, a billion-dollar intelligence industry player
and Snowden's former employer; Palantir, a PayPal-inspired and -funded
outfit that sells "data-mining and analysis software that maps out human
social networks for counterintelligence purposes"; and HBGary Federal, an aspirant consultancy in the intelligence sector.
The Team Themis story began in late 2010, when Julian Assange warned
WikiLeaks would release documents outlining an "ecosystem of corruption
[that] could take down a bank or two." Anticipating that it might be in
Assange's sights, Bank of America went into damage-control mode
and, as the New York Times reported, assembled "a team of 15 to 20 top
Bank of America officials … scouring thousands of documents in the event
that they become public." To oversee the review, Bank of American
brought in Booz Allen Hamilton.
Days later, Bank of America retained the well-connected law firm of Hunton & Williams, which was reportedly recommended by the Department of Justice. Hunton & Williams promptly emailed
HBGary Federal, Palantir and Berico; they, in turn, "proposed various
schemes to attack" WikiLeaks and Greenwald. In fact, Hunton &
Williams had first contacted the three tech firms in October 2010, at the behest of the Chamber of Commerce to find out if it was being attacked by labor union-backed campaigners.
The final cast member, Aaron Barr, then CEO of HBGary
Federal, started creating personal dossiers on Hunton & Williams
employees to display his prowess as a social media ninja – his way of
convincing the law firm that he could train them in the perils of social
media. Barr was anxious to generate income for his struggling subsidiary.
According to the Team Themis proposal, its partners suggested creating false documents and fake personas to damage progressive organizations such as "ThinkProgress, the labor coalition called Change to Win, the SEIU, US Chamber Watch, and StopTheChamber.com". According to reporting by Wired, the three companies hoped to bill the Chamber of Commerce for $2m a month. But while (as leaked emails showed) the parties in the plan went back and forth over how to apportion the spoils, nothing was forthcoming.
Then Hunton & Williams submitted the Bank of
America proposal, and HBGary Federal, Palantir and Berico swung into
action. On 2 December, just three days after Assange's warning, Aaron Barr crafted the plan to launch "cyber attacks" on WikiLeaks.
The tech companies' emails – which Anonymous hacked and Barrett Brown helped publicize – listed planned tactics:
"Feed[ing] the fuel between the feuding groups. Disinformation. Create messages around actions to sabotage or discredit the opposing organization. Submit fake documents and then call out the error."
They also proposed "cyber attacks", using social media
"to profile and identify risky behavior of employees", and "get people
to understand that if they support the organization we will come after
them", implying threats. There was also email chatter
about attacking journalists with "a liberal bent", specifically naming
Greenwald. Some aspects of the Team Themis proposal were reminiscent of a
leaked 2008 Pentagon counterintelligence plan against WikiLeaks.
In early January, email messages from HBGary Federal show
plans for a meeting with Booz Allen Hamilton, apparently regarding
Barr's plans against WikiLeaks and Anonymous. At this point, no one was
buying Barr's scheme – even as he bragged to the Financial Times, on 4 February 2012, that he had used Facebook, Twitter and other social media to identify the "leaders" of Anonymous.
Barr believed that had piqued the interest
of the "FBI, the Director of National Intelligence, and the US
military". In fact, it had merely made him a marked man: two days later,
as Wired reported,
Anonymous "took down [HBGary Federal's] website, stole his emails,
deleted the company's backup data, trashed Barr's Twitter account and
remotely wiped his iPad." For his part, Brown created Project PM, "a crowd-sourced wiki focused on government intelligence contractors" to delve through the tens of thousands of emails taken from HBGary Federal's servers.
A critical element in the story concerns the fact
that, according to one of the leaked emails, the companies were hoping
that "if they can show that WikiLeaks is hosting data in certain
countries it will make prosecution easier." The hacked emails also
revealed, Forbes reported,
that Barr was hoping to sell the information on Anonymous members to
the FBI. The fact that Barr was stoking interest among security agencies
with a dossier of supposed Anonymous members containing incorrect names meant that innocent people might have been jailed if he had succeeded in his scheme.
Barr resigned
and HBGary Federal was subsequently shuttered. But the story doesn't
end there. In July 2011, the Anonymous-linked "AntiSec" raided Booz
Allen Hamilton and made off with 90,000 emails. One allegation that
emerged from the cache was that BAH had been working with HBGary Federal "to develop software that would allow
for the creation of multiple fake social media profiles to infiltrate
discussion groups and manipulate opinion on the sites and discredit
people, as well as to match personas online with offline identities."
Within days of the Team Themis scandal, Palantir issued a statement announcing that it was cutting ties with HBGary Federal and issued an apology to Greenwald. Its reputation was at stake: in 2011, it scored $250m in sales
and its customers included the CIA, FBI, US Special Operations Command,
army, marines, air force, LAPD and NYPD. Tim Shorrock, an intelligence
industry analyst, believes that with an immigration bill working its way
through Congress that will provide billions of dollars for border
enforcement, Palantir is also well-positioned to win new clients like
ICE and the DEA. Along with Booz Allen Hamilton, Palantir is reportedly
being paid by the government to mine social media for "terrorists".
They are just a few of the nearly 2,000 private companies
involved in the US counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence
apparatus. Even as HBGary Federal has disappeared, the privatized
surveillance state continues to expand. The privatized intelligence budget alone is estimated at $56bn.
Given the revelations about domestic surveillance,
Brown could speak volumes about the nexus between corporations and the
state – except that he's been cooling his heels in a jail outside
Dallas, Texas, for 290 days, awaiting two separate trials that could put
him on ice for more than 100 years. The US government has slapped Brown with 17 counts that include identity theft, stealing thousands of credit card numbers, concealing evidence, and "internet threats".
Ahmed Ghappour, attorney for Brown, calls the charges
"prosecutorial overreach", and maintains most are related to legitimate
journalistic practices, such as cutting-and-pasting a link and refusing
to give the FBI access to his sources on a laptop, "a modern-day
notebook". In contrast to the FBI's aggressive pursuit of Brown, no
probe of the Team Themis project was launched – despite a call from 17 US House representatives to investigate
a possible conspiracy to violate federal laws, including forgery, mail
and wire fraud, and fraud and related activity in connection with
computers. Ghappour asks:
"What length will the government go to prosecute journalists reporting on intelligence contractors? Brown was one of the first to report on the plan to take down Glenn Greenwald.
"It was clear Booz Allen Hamilton [whistleblower Edward Snowden's former employer] was consulting with the NSA, at least supporting their mass-surveillance program, and this was one of the leads Barrett was chasing at the time of the arrest."
Team Themis also demonstrates that HBGary Federal
tried to ramp up official fear of leakers and freedom of information
activists for commercial ends. And it's hardly the only one. Recent
episodes involve Wall Street banks encouraging police forces to target Occupy Wall Street activists, private security firms earning money by hyping threats of environmental activists, and chemical companies plotting
to intimidate scientists and public officials. Because corporations
lack public oversight, privatizing critical public functions allows
government to conduct dirty tricks with less scrutiny, while businesses
can warp the very fabric of society by manufacturing threats in order to
boost revenues and profits. As Ghappour asks again:
"Who's policing the corporations? Who's holding them accountable to the same standards as our government? And we need to question those standards given incidents like the Obama administration seizing the phone records of the AP."
On Christmas day 2011, the intelligence-analysis firm Stratfor, which Anonymous accused of running a wide-ranging spying operation, was hacked. Brown was the one who alerted the mainstream media
to the hack: among the millions of files released were thousands of
credit-card names and numbers. Like many, Brown posted a link to the
files; it was this that the government would seize on to indict Brown
for credit-card theft. According to Ghappour:
"That link was accessible to anyone in the world with an internet connection. That link was shared hundreds or even thousands of times that day but Barrett was the only one that was indicted."
On 6 March 2012, the FBI raided Brown,
looking for among other things "records related to HBGary [Federal]".
Under growing pressure, Brown posted a YouTube rant in September 2012,
in which he spoke of his opiate use and made reference to the Zetas, a
ruthless Mexican drug cartel. Speaking to his computer screen, Brown
warned that "any armed officials of the US government, particularly the
FBI, will be regarded as potential Zeta assassin squads and … I will
shoot all of them and kill them." Clearly, Brown felt persecuted, but it
was an ill-advised statement, which has led to jail without bail for
nine months and a harsh list of indictments.
Ghappour asserts there is a logic why the government
is keen to prosecute private contractor whistleblowers and activist
journalists like Brown:
"The problem is you have companies doing very sensitive intelligence work for the government. It follows that the enemies of those companies are your own [enemies]. And it would be in their interest to silence or prosecute journalists investigating those companies."
Because of his role as a muckraking reporter, Brown has attracted defenders like Glenn Greenwald
and Rolling Stones' Michael Hastings, who died last week in a car
accident. Yet, perhaps because he wasn't as high-profile as Bradley
Manning or as unassailable as Aaron Swartz, Brown hasn't attracted the
type of support that can effectively pressure the government. But with
the light thrown on the privatised national security state by the leaks
from former BAH contractor for the NSA Edward Snowden, there is renewed
interest in Brown's plight and the campaign for justice in his case.
No comments:
Post a Comment