Wednesday, November 23, 2016


There are nine [9] compartments / chambers in the brain.  Each compartment/chamber has a treasure / gift.  When we use less than seven (7) percent of our brain, then we definitely must not complain about the reality of ineptitude.

THE MIND is in every cell of the body.  The Body is an instrument for the energy that is an unseen power which infinitely experiences the reality of countless seen forms.

The nose is how to line up number one (1), the hairline is where the BEAK HANDS after gathering energy in a deep inhalation, as in an acupuncture point, touch #1, and exhale.  Inhale and exhale nine (9) times in each compartment / chamber.

To be continued ... a video is in production and to be posted so we can become the whole being we are ...

U.S Constitution isn't a piece of paper George W. Bush and not pesky either Hillary Clinton

Monday, November 21, 2016




After Hillary Clinton’s disastrous defeat in the US presidential election, George Soros and other influential liberal donors in Washington D.C. are mulling tactics for resisting a new “Trump order.”

Last week George Soros and a group of rich American donors, which placed their bet on Hillary Clinton and lost, held a three-day conference in Washington D.C. to set things right. 

Citing documents obtained by US author and journalist Kenneth P. Vogel called attention to the fact that the meeting was sponsored by the influential Democracy Alliance donor club and brought together “leaders of most leading unions and liberal groups, as well as darlings of the left such as House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairman Keith Ellison.” According to the journalist, the conference, which followed the “shocking victory” of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, was aimed at working out a plan to resist economic and political changes which are due to be introduced by the US President-elect. In other words, the “liberals plan full-on trench warfare against Trump from Day One,” Vogel suggested.

The journalist quoted Gara LaMarche, the president of the Democracy Alliance (DA), who highlighted that the meeting would start the process of assessing “what steps we will take together to resist the assaults that are coming and take back power, beginning in the states in 2017 and 2018.”

On November 17 the journalist signaled that “the process” was gaining pace. Vogel reported that David Brock, founder of liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America and Clinton’s longstanding loyalist, “emailed more than 200 of the biggest donors on the left,” including George Soros. Brock offered the magnates to join a series of gatherings to discuss “the next steps for progressives under a Trump Administration,” the journalist noted, quoting emails obtained by “What better way to spend the inaugural weekend than talking about how to kick Donald Trump’s ass?” Brock remarked, as cited by the US journalist.
Commenting on the issue in his article for New Eastern Outlook Martin Berger, an independent journalist and geopolitical analyst, sees these developments as signaling a “veritable war against Trump.”

Berger pointed out that it is no secret that George Soros has had a hand in anti-Trump demonstrations which had erupted following Trump’s victory. 

For instance, one of the groups behind the protest movement,, could have been funded by Soros, as one of the Podesta files released by Wikileaks indicates. Meanwhile on the other side of the Atlantic a strikingly similar situation is unfolding. In his recent interview with Sputnik Deutschland, Willy Wimmer, former Parliamentary State Secretary in the German Defense Ministry, drew attention to the recent meeting between outgoing US President Barack Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. According to the German politician the US “war establishment” which has long supported Hillary Clinton, is seeking to thwart Trump’s potential foreign policy shift away from perpetual wars. Following Clinton’s defeat the “war establishment” has pinned its hopes on Angela Merkel, he noted, as a “bulwark” against Donald Trump in Europe. “So far, Mrs. Merkel would be given a role of the ‘last resistance fighter against newly elected American President Trump’,” Wimmer pointed out. “We are dealing with a sort of international ‘collective policy’ pursued by Democrats together with the ‘war establishment’ of Democrats and Republicans in Washington. So, there is a certain role offered to Mrs. Merkel. If one remembers what Merkel said last week regarding the US presidential election, one will see that she is willing to play this role,” he underscored. “If I were sitting in Washington I would probably think that there is a conspiracy brewing against me,” the German politician noted, referring to Soros’ recent gathering described by Vogel.

Saturday, November 5, 2016


Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton listens to a question during the town hall debate at Washington University on October 9, 2016 in St Louis, Missouri.

New FBI release on Clinton email probe refers to 'Shadow Government'  FBI releases trove of Clinton documents  

A new trove of interview summaries and notes from the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails lays out a series of allegations that could prove fodder for future attacks on the Democratic presidential nominee.

The 100 pages, released Monday morning, include claims that Clinton "blatantly" disregarded protocol. Other claims include that a group of powerful State Department employees attempted to coordinate a document release, and that a department official asked for a "quid pro quo" related to the former secretary of state's emails.

The documents, part four of four to be released by the FBI, include notes and interview summaries that may illuminate more about the bureau's decision not to recommend Clinton be prosecuted for her actions.

Many Republicans have criticized that decision, but FBI Director James Comey has repeatedly insisted the move was apolitical.

"I want the American people to know we really did this the right way. You can disagree with us, but you cannot fairly say we did it in any kind of political way," Comey said in July. "We don't carry water for anybody. We were trying to do what the right thing is." 

One revelation in the documents came from an interview with an unidentified person who suggested that Freedom of Information Act requests related to Clinton went through a group sometimes called "the Shadow Government."

"There was a powerful group of very high-ranking STATE officials that some referred to as 'The 7th Floor Group' or 'The Shadow Government.' This group met every Wednesday afternoon to discuss the FOIA process, Congressional records, and everything CLINTON-related to FOIA/Congressional inquiries," the FBI's interview summary said.

That group, according to the summary, argued for a Clinton document release to be conducted all at once "for coordination purposes" instead of on a rolling basis as would normally be the case. But the "Shadow Government" did not get its way, and the agency in charge decided for a rolling release, the FBI summary said.

Another claim from the documents is that one unidentified interviewee said Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy pressured the FBI to unclassify certain emails from Clinton's private server that were previously deemed classified.

The interviewee said Kennedy contacted the FBI to ask for the change in classification in "exchange for a 'quid pro quo.'"

A representative for the State Department categorically denied that claim.

"This allegation is inaccurate and does not align with the facts. To be clear: the State Department did upgrade the document at the request of the FBI when we released it back in May 2015," State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner said.

"Under Secretary Kennedy sought to understand the FBI's process for withholding certain information from public release," Toner added. "As has been reported, there have been discussions within the interagency on issues of classification. Classification is an art, not a science, and individuals with classification authority sometimes have different views. There can be applicable FOIA exemptions that are based on both classified and unclassified rules."

The FBI also denied such a "quid pro quo," offering NBC News the following statement:
"Prior to the initiation of the FBI's investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server, the FBI was asked to review and make classification determinations on FBI emails and information which were being produced by the State Department pursuant to FOIA. The FBI determined that one such email was classified at the Secret level. A senior State Department official requested the FBI re-review that email to determine whether it was in fact classified or whether it might be protected from release under a different FOIA exemption. A now-retired FBI official, who was not part of the subsequent Clinton investigation, told the State Department official that they would look into the matter. Having been previously unsuccessful in attempts to speak with the senior State official, during the same conversation, the FBI official asked the State Department official if they would address a pending, unaddressed FBI request for space for additional FBI employees assigned abroad. Following the call, the FBI official consulted with a senior FBI executive responsible for determining the classification of the material and determined the email was in fact appropriately classified at the Secret level. The FBI official subsequently told the senior State official that the email was appropriately classified at the Secret level and that the FBI would not change the classification of the email. The classification of the email was not changed, and it remains classified today. Although there was never a quid pro quo, these allegations were nonetheless referred to the appropriate officials for review."
Separately, one claim from the FBI documents that was receiving attention online was that one interviewee said there was a "stark difference" between Clinton's "obedience to security and diplomatic protocols" and that of former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Clinton, the interviewee said, "blatantly" disregarded such protocols, including her frequent refusal to attend foreign diplomatic functions with the local ambassador.

"This frequently resulted in complaints by ambassadors who were insulted and embarrassed by this breach of protocol," the interview summary said, adding that the subject claimed that "Clinton's protocol breaches were well known throughout Diplomatic Security and were 'abundant.'"

—NBC News and Reuters contributed to this report.