In reality, this is about one thing and one thing only: money. New
York has become a true tale of two cities in the Bloomberg era, and the
rich don’t want Spitzer in control of $140 billion in city pension
funds, making him instantly one of the world’s most important activist
investors. That would be too taxing on the executive class, and they and
their friends stick together. So women’s groups or other big-money
donors can come up with some “legitimate” reason to oppose Spitzer, but
nobody’s really fooled.
Wall Street initially put together a SuperPAC, “Forward NY,” to
funnel money to Stringer. Then, when it looked like Spitzer would win,
they abandoned the effort.
The big reason was that they would probably have to disclose their
donations, which would give Spitzer something of a hit list identifying
who tried to stop his candidacy (in addition, donors who also had
contracts with city pension funds would be breaking the law, and the disclosure would show it).
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/09/david-dayen-character-attack-on-spitzer-veiling-wall-street-led-establishment-assault-on-his-comptroller-candidacy.html
No comments:
Post a Comment