- A Miracle in Wisconsin, by Jon Rappoport, December 30, 2013, www.nomorefakenews.com
-
- I published this article in October of 2002. At the time, it was the most widely read piece I'd written and posted on my site. Its basics still hold up.
-
- What I didn't mention at the time was the corrosive role school-food distributors and their allies on boards of education play in the health of children.
-
- These are the people who operate a corrupt system and mandate the feeding of toxic and nutritionally empty junk to students across the country.
-
- One school took another path:
-
- A revolution has occurred in Appleton, Wisconsin.. It's taken place in the Central Alternative High School. The kids now behave. The hallways aren't frantic. Even the teachers are happy.
- The school used to be out of control. Kids packed weapons. Discipline problems swamped the principal's office.
- But not since 1997.
- What happened? Did they line every inch of space with cops? Did they spray Valium gas in the classrooms? Did they install metal detectors in the bathrooms? Did they build holding cells in the gym?
- Afraid not. In 1997, a private group called Natural Ovens began installing a healthy lunch program.
- Fast-food burgers, fries, and burritos gave way to fresh salads, meats "prepared with old-fashioned recipes," and whole grain bread. Fresh fruits were added to the menu. Good drinking water arrived.
- Vending machines were removed.
- As reported in a newsletter called Pure Facts, "Grades are up, truancy is no longer a problem, arguments are rare, and teachers are able to spend their time teaching."
- Principal LuAnn Coenen, who files annual reports with the state of Wisconsin, has turned in some staggering figures since 1997.
- Drop-outs? Students expelled? Students discovered to be using drugs? Carrying weapons? Committing suicide? Every category has come up ZERO. Every year.
- Mary Bruyette, a teacher, states, "I don't have to deal with daily discipline issues. I don't have disruptions in class or the difficulties with student behavior I experienced before we started the food program."
- One student asserted, "Now that I can concentrate I think it's easier to get along with people." What a concept---eating healthier food increases concentration.
- Principal Coenen sums it up: "I can't buy the argument that it's too costly for schools to provide good nutrition for their students. I found that one cost will reduce another. I don't have the vandalism. I don't have the litter. I don't have the need for high security."
- At a nearby middle school, the new food program is catching on. A teacher there, Dennis Abram, reports, "I've taught here almost 30 years. I see the kids this year as calmer, easier to talk to. They just seem more rational. I had thought about retiring this year and basically I've decided to teach another year---I'm having too much fun!"
- Pure Facts, the newsletter that ran this story, is published by a non-profit organization called The Feingold Association, which has existed since 1976. Part of its mission is to "generate public awareness of the potential role of foods and synthetic additives in behavior, learning and health problems. The [Feingold] program is based on a diet eliminating synthetic colors, synthetic flavors, and the preservatives BHA, BHT, and TBHQ."
- Thirty years ago there was a Dr. Feingold. His breakthrough work proved the connection between these negative factors in food and the lives of children. Hailed as a revolutionary advance, Feingold's findings were soon trashed by the medical cartel, since those findings threatened the drugs-for-everything, disease-model concept of modern healthcare.
- But Feingold's followers have kept his work alive.
- If what happened in Appleton, Wisconsin, takes hold in many other communities across America, perhaps the ravenous corporations who invade school space with their vending machines and junk food will be tossed out on their behinds. It could happen.
- And perhaps ADHD will become a dinosaur. A non-disease that was once attributed to errant brain chemistry. And perhaps Ritalin will be seen as just another toxic chemical that was added to the bodies of kids in a crazed attempt to put a lid on behavior that, in part, was the result of a subversion of the food supply.
- For those readers who ask me about solutions to the problems we face---here is a real solution. Help these groups. Get involved. Step into the fray. Stand up and be counted.
- The drug companies aren't going to do it. They're busy estimating the size of their potential markets. They're building their chemical pipelines into the minds and bodies of the young.
- Every great revolution starts with a foothold. Sounds like Natural Ovens and The Feingold Association have made strong cuts into the big rock of ignorance and greed.
- Jon Rappoport
- The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
A miracle in Wisconsin
ANGELINA JOLIE PIMPING MUTILATION AS ANOTHER DUMBEST WOMAN ON EARTH, first PUB 5/15/13

[sidebar #1: This ?woman has either gone stark raving coo coo, or she is definitely what the reports have reported: Agenda~21~MONARCH SLAVE, to be continued ...]
May 14, 2013
Yes, It Is Worth Making A Federal Case Over Angelina Jolie’s Boobs
This morning, the New York Times published an op-ed by actress Angelina Jolie discussing her decision to get a preventative double mastectomy.
Jolie is being hailed as an inspiration for coming forward with this story, which marks an amazing turn-around for a woman who used to make out with her brother and carry vials of her then-husband’s blood around her neck.
The actress decided to take the preventative measure after genetic testing determined that she had an 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer.
Now, Jolie is a movie star married to another movie star, so the decision to undergo an expensive procedure did not deter her like it will many women in the United States.
Not the mastectomy. Insurance usually covers that if the patient presents such risks. No, the expensive procedure is the initial genetic testing. And the Supreme Court might be able to do something about that in the next couple of months…
The genetic testing that caught Jolie’s cancer risk involved extracting the BRCA1 gene. BRCA1, along with BRCA2, can be tested by a process created by a company called Myriad Genetics. Along with creating the process, Myriad scored a patent on the test. As you’d expect the price of the test is inflated by the government-authorized monopoly that is a patent. What many may not know is that patented genetic testing is often excluded from health insurance coverage because of this high cost:
Most women who want testing must pay its price — $3,340 for the breast cancer analysis and $700 for an additional test, called BART, which picks up a genetic link in about 10% of women who test negative the first time. Myriad officials say about 95% of its patients receive insurance coverage, often without co-payments, so most patients pay only about $100.Myriad’s claim that most patients pay very little is belied by both the persistently high number of uninsured women in America and the fact that the oft-villified Affordable Care Act is pretty much the only thing allowing Myriad to use the word “most.” Among the myriad (ha!) requirements of the Affordable Care Act, one made insurance companies cover testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
But there’s a catch, because of course there’s a catch. A number of health plans were “grandfathered” by the Affordable Care Act and still don’t need to provide coverage.
Grandfathered insurance plans are those that existed on or before March, 23, 2010, the date the Affordable Care Act was enacted. In 2012, only about half of Americans who received health insurance from their employers were enrolled in grandfathered insurance plans, Myriad Genetics said.Obviously more and more people are moving into newer plans every day, but a hefty portion are stuck without affordable access to a pretty significant test, and insurance companies are paying top dollar for a test that pretty much just looks at a gene.
And that’s where the Supreme Court comes in. In Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Court heard arguments from both sides on the patentability of human genes. Despite some interesting arguments from Myriad, the Supreme Court seemed skeptical of a company’s claim to patent a naturally occurring gene just because they found it first. Justices Scalia and Alito expressed concern over whether a genetics company would have the incentive to conduct research it its potential profits were merely obscene instead of gloriously obscene. Meanwhile the other justices (except for Thomas who continued his trend of not being engaged in the actual act of “judging”) expressed concern over patenting a human gene.
Chief Justice John Roberts said it was not akin to patenting a baseball bat extracted from a tree, since considerable work is involved in making the bat.
“You have to invent it,” Roberts said of the baseball bat. When it comes to the isolated gene used to find mutations that can cause breast or ovarian cancer, he said, “You just have to snip it off.”A decision is expected in June.
Fundamentally, the problem is the over-reliance on patent law to incentivize innovation. Economist Tyler Cowen, writing about treating pandemics in the Times recently, suggested the government would be more efficient if it issued cash rewards for innovation in certain cases rather than relying on patents. That would seem to better fit here by addressing the economic concerns of Justices Scalia and Alito without ignoring that patent law actually requires something more than finding something in nature.
And it would have the added benefit of helping women that may have a significant cancer risk get the facts and make proactive decisions for themselves and those that rely on them. Even if they don’t have movie star incomes and movie star husbands.
Women like Jennifer Aniston. By Joe Patrice http://abovethelaw.com/2013/05/yes-it-is-worth-making-a-federal-case-over-angelina-jolies-boobs/#disqus_thread


http://www.theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/05/master-zhou-ting-jue-qi-gong-tai-chi.html
[sidebar:
There is no question as to why the USA has been kicked to the curb by all the sane countries that have kicked the USA out.
HOLLY WOOD selling APARTHEID-GENOCIDE MUTILATION OF OUR OWN SPECIES, MONSANTO, AND NAME A HORROR WE DON'T PAY HOLLY WOOD'S CIA-FBI-NSA-DHS-TSA-ET-AL-ET-CETERA TO DO WHAT WE LIVE IN AS THOUGH THIS AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM ISN'T CRIMINALLY INSANE.
ALL THE WAY TO THE 'BANK/S' BANK ON IT.
ie eg, MONSANTO causes whatever the owners of the poisons want to achieve and that is, money and brain controlled living organisms to be slaves for the owners' of the USA-Israel.
Hollywood Monster Movies have been manufactured by the Agenda 21 SLOBS' BLOB and there is only one ideology: money and mutilations so that competition is defunct between the humans who have the so called 'tests' and then, the ~Robed Terrorist Roaches that get to be top tons and infinite numbers of stupids, of the insect ladder, take totalitarian control of 'life' and call it Supreme Justice.
America land of the free, home of the brave and people that are not cognizant of being human.
Where is my space shuttle!
.. to be continued ... !?]
Hollywood meets Wall Street: Author William Stadiem talks Moneywood
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/03/wall-street-jack-ripper-technofascism.html
http://reason.com/reasontv/2013/03/04/what-happened-when-wall-street-and-holly
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/04/circumcision-aka-metzitzah-bpeh-federal.html
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/04/zionist-human-filth-new-york-times.html
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/05/crusading-genocidal-maniacal-apartheid.html
If— Rudyard Kipling
|
If— |
|
|
|
IF you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs and blaming it on you, If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, But make allowance for their doubting too; If you can wait and not be tired by waiting, Or being lied about, don't deal in lies, Or being hated, don't give way to hating, And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise: If you can dream - and not make dreams your master; If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim; If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same; If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools: If you can make one heap of all your winnings And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss, And lose, and start again at your beginnings And never breathe a word about your loss; If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew To serve your turn long after they are gone, And so hold on when there is nothing in you Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!' If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, Or walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch, If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, If all men count with you, but none too much; If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds' worth of distance run, Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it, And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son! |
Panelists Discuss the Role of Judges at Federalist Society Convention
FROM WATCHDOG WIRE
Constitutional timeless principles
November 21, 2013, by Quinn Nii
Speakers addressed a variety of important legal topics associated with this year’s theme, “Textualism and the Role of Judges.” Textualism is a theory of interpreting laws based on the ordinary meaning of the words.
Held at the Mayflower Hotel
in Washington, D.C., the convention marked its 26th
anniversary. Legal scholars, luminaries, law professors and policy wonks all gathered for vigorous discussion of important legal topics. Over 100 speakers and 20 panels ensured attendees would be busy.
The focus on textualism is symbolic of the conservative-leaning group’s focus on preserving the idea that judges should look at what the law says in making their rulings, instead of what they want it to say.
Though considered conservative or libertarian-leaning, the Federalist Society welcomes intellectual diversity and disagreement among members.
“The uniqueness of the Federalist Society is that it invites the other side of the aisle more than the other side [invites them],” one attendee said.
That openness to other ideas could stem from the group taking its inspiration from the Founding Fathers. Though started in 1982, the group looks to past principles, including those articulated in the Federalist Papers, including Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 78: “It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy, may substitute their own pleasure to the constitutional intentions of the legislature.”
Highlights of this year’s convention comprised of Four Showcases: a) Textualism and the Bill of Rights. b) Textualism and Constitutional Interpretation c) Formalism and Deference in Administrative Law d) Textualism and Statutory Interpretation.
One panel, “The Executive Branch Gone Wild,” discussed 21st century checks and balances. Professor David Schoenbrod noted that Madison explained the three branches of government while expressing concern about a growing “fourth branch” of government: bureaucracy.
“The creation of a fourth branch creates a system that has not been tested,” Schoenbrod said.
He added that government should “do the things they were supposed to do” and not much else.
In a separate panel on “Use of Disparate Impact Analysis,” the panelists discussed issues regarding civil rights and the law. Professor William Yeomans noted there is an enormous “fundamental cleavage of both sides of the civil rights argument.”
Moderator Kenneth Marcus, President of the Brandeis Center for Human Rights concluded by sharing how, during his time at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, he was overseeing several disability
cases where his “blood was beginning to boil” due to biases and
subjective decision making which led to discriminatory practices. Rounding out the conference was the sixth annual Rosenkrantz Debate luncheon. The featured presentation was a debate between Judge Jay Harvie Wilkinson and Professor Randy Barnett.

The crowd roared with laughter at some of Judge Wilkinson’s refreshing commentary about the “old boy establishment.”
Professor Barnett eloquently referenced Federalist paper 78 written by Alexander Hamilton; argued that a judge’s need to exercise duty of power
with restraint and deference to a legislature can be nice in theory but challenging in practice. Judge Wilkinson counter-punched with an argument about enumerated rights, although he stated, “I maybe booed with the unpopular response to Chief Justice John Roberts Affordable Care
Act decision”, he stated it was a courageous decision.“Imagine if the Gettysburg address or the Constitution says ‘We the Judges say Government of the Judge by the Judge shall not perish from this Earth,’ rather than government by We the People. Why should one profession of attorneys dictate to all other professions?…”
Fittingly, Judge Wikinson pointed out there are many famous No’s in our Constitution to protect the electorate from an over-reaching Government.
This year’s
2013 convention featured a closing panel on ‘The Electorate and the
Courts’ featuring former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement who led the
charge on behalf of 26 states to overturn Obamacare.
Joining him was John Fund, columnist for National Review, who referenced that the “courts need to do a better job
explaining the political rhetoric rather than casting blame on the electorate process”. Concluding the convention was a special celebration of President and CEO Eugene Meyer’s 30 years of distinguished leadership.
“We look forward to many future events and discussions in the years ahead,” concluded Mr. Meyer, who received a large wooden clock signifying his timeless, principled leadership.
Quinn Nii
Quinn Nii is a Watchdog Wire contributor for the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity.http://watchdogwire.com/blog/2013/11/21/panelists-discuss-role-judges-federalist-society-convention/
U$$ta$I$raelI 'Nazi 'Merica Post 2014 ALARM: James Madison, the father of the Constitution, “Take alarm” .. “at the first experiment with liberties” !
Commentary Life in the Emerging American Police State: What’s in Store for Our Freedoms in 2014? By John W. Whitehead, December 30, 2013
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”—George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Vol. 1
In Harold Ramis’ classic 1993 comedy Groundhog Day, TV
weatherman Phil Connors (played by Bill Murray) is forced to live the
same day over and over again until he not only gains some insight into
his life but changes his priorities. Similarly, as I illustrate in my
book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State,
we in the emerging American police state find ourselves reliving the
same set of circumstances over and over again—egregious surveillance,
strip searches, police shootings of unarmed citizens, government spying,
the criminalization of lawful activities, warmongering, etc.—although
with far fewer moments of comic hilarity.
What remains to be seen is whether 2014 will bring more of the same or
whether “we the people” will wake up from our somnambulant states.
Indeed, when it comes to civil liberties and freedom, 2013 was far from a
banner year. The following is just a sampling of what we can look
forward to repeating if we don’t find some way to push back against the
menace of an overreaching, aggressive, invasive, militarized government
and restore our freedoms.
Government spying. It’s hard to understand how anyone
could be surprised by the news that the National Security Agency has
been systematically collecting information on all telephone calls placed
in the United States, and yet the news media have treated it as a
complete revelation.
Nevertheless, such outlandish government spying
been going on domestically since the 1970s, when Senator Frank Church
(D-Ida.), who served as the chairman of the Select Committee on
Intelligence that investigated the NSA’s breaches, warned the public
against allowing the government to overstep its authority in the name of
national security. Church recognized that such surveillance powers “at
any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American
would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor
everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There
would be no place to hide.” Recent reports indicate that the NSA, in
conjunction with the CIA and FBI, has actually gone so far as to
intercept laptop computers ordered online in order to install spyware on
them.
Militarized police. With almost 13,000 agencies in all
50 states and four U.S. territories participating in a military
“recycling” program, community police forces across the country continue
to be transformed into outposts of the military, with police agencies
acquiring military-grade hardware—tanks, weaponry, and other equipment
designed for the battlefield—in droves. Keep in mind that once acquired,
this military equipment, which is beyond the budget and scope of most
communities, finds itself put to all manner of uses by local law
enforcement agencies under the rationale that “if we have it, we might
as well use it”—the same rationale, by the way, used with deadly results
to justify assigning SWAT teams to carry out routine law enforcement
work such as delivering a warrant.
Police shootings of unarmed citizens. Owing in large
part to the militarization of local law enforcement agencies, not a week
goes by without more reports of hair-raising incidents by police imbued
with a take-no-prisoners attitude and a battlefield approach to the
communities in which they serve. Sadly, it is no longer unusual to hear
about incidents in which police shoot unarmed individuals first and ask
questions later, such as the 16-year-old teenager who skipped school
only to be shot by police after they mistook him for a fleeing burglar.
Then there was the unarmed black man in Texas “who was pursued and shot
in the back of the neck by Austin Police… after failing to properly
identify himself and leaving the scene of an unrelated incident.” And
who could forget the 19-year-old Seattle woman who was accidentally shot
in the leg by police after she refused to show her hands? The lesson to
be learned: this is what happens when you take a young man (or woman),
raise him on a diet of violence, hype him up on the power of the gun in
his holster and the superiority of his uniform, render him woefully
ignorant of how to handle a situation without resorting to violence,
train him well in military tactics but allow him to be illiterate about
the Constitution, and never stress to him that he is to be a peacemaker
and a peacekeeper, respectful of and subservient to the taxpayers, who
are in fact his masters and employers.
The erosion of private property. If the government can
tell you what you can and cannot do within the privacy of your home,
whether it relates to what you eat or what you smoke, you no longer have
any rights whatsoever within your home. If government officials can
fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard, praying
with friends in your living room, installing solar panels on your roof,
and raising chickens in your backyard, you’re no longer the owner of
your property. If school officials can punish your children for what
they do or say while at home or in your care, your children are not your
own—they are the property of the state. If government agents can invade
your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your
furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer
private and secure—it belongs to the government. Likewise, if police can
forcefully draw your blood, strip search you, and probe you intimately,
your body is no longer your own, either. This is what a world without
the Fourth Amendment looks like, where the lines between private and
public property have been so blurred that private property is reduced to
little more than something the government can use to control,
manipulate and harass you to suit its own purposes, and you the
homeowner and citizen have been reduced to little more than a tenant or
serf in bondage to an inflexible landlord.
Strip searches and the loss of bodily integrity. The
Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was intended to protect the
citizenry from being subjected to “unreasonable searches and seizures”
by government agents. While the literal purpose of the amendment is to
protect our property and our bodies from unwarranted government
intrusion, the moral intention behind it is to protect our human
dignity. Unfortunately, court rulings undermining the Fourth Amendment
and justifying invasive strip searches have left us powerless against
police empowered to forcefully draw our blood, strip search us, and
probe us intimately. For example, during a routine traffic stop, Leila
Tarantino was allegedly subjected to two roadside strip searches in
plain view of passing traffic, while her two children—ages 1 and
4—waited inside her car. During the second strip search, presumably in
an effort to ferret out drugs, a female officer “forcibly removed” a
tampon from Tarantino. No contraband or anything illegal was found.
Invasion of the drones. As corporations and government
agencies alike prepare for their part in the coming drone invasion—it
is expected that at least 30,000 drones will occupy U.S. airspace by
2020, ushering in a $30 billion per year industry—it won’t be long
before Americans discover first-hand that drones—unmanned aerial
vehicles—come in all shapes and sizes, from nano-sized drones as small
as a grain of sand that can do everything from conducting surveillance
to detonating explosive charges, to middle-sized copter drones that can
deliver pizzas to massive “hunter/killer” Predator warships that unleash
firepower from on high. Police in California have already begun using
Qube drones, which are capable of hovering for 40 minutes at heights of
about 400 ft. to conduct surveillance on targets as far as 1 kilometer
away. Michael Downing, the LAPD deputy chief for counter-terrorism and
special operations, envisions drones being flown over large-scale media
events such as the Oscars, using them to surveil political protests, and
flying them through buildings to track criminal suspects.
Criminalizing childish behavior. It wouldn’t be a week
in America without another slew of children being punished for childish
behavior under the regime of zero tolerance which plagues our nation’s
schools. Some of the most egregious: the 9-year-old boy suspended for
allegedly pointing a toy at a classmate and saying “bang, bang”; two
6-year-old students in Maryland suspended for using their fingers as
imaginary guns in a schoolyard game of cops and robbers; the
ten-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for shooting an imaginary
“arrow” at a fellow classmate, using nothing more than his hands and his
imagination; the six-year-old Colorado boy suspended and accused of
sexual harassment for kissing the hand of a girl in his class whom he
had a crush on; and the two seventh graders in Virginia suspended for
the rest of the school year for playing with airsoft guns in their own
yard before school.
Common Core. There are several methods for controlling
a population. You can intimidate the citizenry into obedience through
force, relying on military strength and weaponry such as SWAT team
raids, militarized police, and a vast array of lethal and nonlethal
weapons. You can manipulate them into marching in lockstep with your
dictates through the use of propaganda and carefully timed fear tactics
about threats to their safety, whether through the phantom menace of
terrorist attacks or shooting sprees by solitary gunmen. Or you can
indoctrinate them into compliance from an early age through the schools,
discouraging them from thinking for themselves while rewarding them for
regurgitating whatever the government, through its so-called
educational standards, dictates they should be taught. When viewed in
light of the government’s ongoing attempts to amass power at great cost
to Americans—in terms of free speech rights, privacy, due process,
etc.—the debate over Common Core State Standards, which would transform
and nationalize school curriculum from kindergarten through 12th grade,
becomes that much more critical. These standards, which were developed
through a partnership between big government and corporations and are
being rolled out in 45 states and the District of Columbia, will create a
generation of test-takers capable of little else, molded and shaped by
the federal government and its corporate allies into what it considers
to be ideal citizens.
The corporate takeover of America. The corporate
buyout of the American political bureaucracy is taking place at every
level of government, from the White House all the way to the various
governors’ mansions, and even local city councils. With Big Business and
Big Government having fused into a corporate state, the president and
his state counterparts—the governors, have become little more than CEOs
of the Corporate State, which day by day is assuming more government
control over our lives. The average American has no access to his or her
representatives at any but the lowest level of government, and even
then it’s questionable how much really gets through. Never before have
average Americans had so little say in the workings of their government
and even less access to their so-called representatives. Yet one of the
key ingredients in maintaining democratic government is the right of
citizens to freely speak their minds to those who represent them. In
fact, it is one of the few effective tools we have left to combat
government corruption and demand accountability. But now, even that
right is being chipped away by laws and court rulings that weaken our
ability to speak freely to the politicians who govern us.
James Madison, the father of the Constitution, put it best: “Take
alarm,” he warned, “at the first experiment with liberties.” Anyone with
even a casual knowledge about current events knows that the first
experiment on our freedoms happened long ago. Worse, we have not heeded
the warnings of Madison and those like him who understood that if you
give the government an inch, they will take a mile. Unfortunately, the
government has not only taken a mile, they have taken mile after mile
after mile after mile with seemingly no end in sight for their power
grabs.
If you’re in the business of making New Year’s resolutions, why not
resolve that 2014 will be the year we break the cycle of tyranny and get
back on the road to freedom. As I’ve said before, it’s time for a
second American revolution.
WC: 2045
America's Internal Checkpoints, Refuseniks fight back against feds demanding papers
Wes Kimbell from the January 2014 issue
U.S. GovernmentDuring a
routine trip from San Diego to Phoenix in 2009, Pastor Steven
Anderson was stopped at an internal immigration checkpoint about 70
miles from the Mexican border. A stern-looking Border Patrol agent
asked Anderson to provide proof of citizenship and requested
permission to search his car.2014 & CONSTITUTION Dead On Arrival [DOA]: Constitution 'exemption' zone spans 100 miles inland of US border– judge
![]() |
| December 31, 2013 >> Get short URL
AFP Photo / John Moore
|
District Judge Edward Korman made his ruling in New York on Tuesday, more than three years after the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed suit. The ACLU claimed that - since Americans put so much of their lives on their computers, cell phones, and other devices – border officials should have reasonable suspicion before sifting through someone's personal files.
Attorneys argued that searches conducted without reasonable suspicion are a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure.
Not so, according to Judge Korman. In his decision Tuesday he argued that the area 100 miles inland falls under a “border exemption.”
“Laptops have only come into widespread use in the twenty-first century. Prior to that time, lawyers, photographers, and scholars managed to travel overseas and consult with clients, take photographs, and conduct scholarly research,” wrote Korman.
“No one ever suggested the possibility of a border search had a chilling effect on his or her First Amendment rights. While it is true that laptops make overseas work more convenient, the precaution plaintiffs may choose to take to 'mitigate' the alleged harm associated with the remote possibility of a border search are simply among the many inconveniences associated with international travel.”
The federal government has long conducted searches on travelers entering and leaving the US, but Congress expanded that policy by creating the Department of Homeland Security and setting up at least 33 checkpoints inside the country where people are stopped and asked to prove their citizenship.
The trouble is, the ACLU noted, that almost two-thirds of the population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the US border. New York, Washington, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Miami, and dozens of other major metropolitan areas fall under the so-called “exemption” zone.
The civil-liberties advocacy group filed suit in 2010 on behalf of Pascal Abidor, a 29-year-old Islamic Studies student whose laptop computer was held for 11 days when he was traveling by Amtrak rail from Canada to his parents' home in New York.
Abidor was sitting in the train's cafe car when an officer forced him to take out his laptop then “ordered Mr. Abidor to enter his password,” the suit claimed. The computer contained images of Hamas and Hezbollah rallies and the agents, unmoved by Abidor's assertion the images were related to his studies, handcuffed the young man and kept him detained for three hours, questioning him numerous times.
Department of Homeland Security data indicates that 6,500 people had their devices search between 2008 and 2010 alone.
Catherine Crump, the ACLU attorney who argued Abidor's case, told Wired that the group was considering filing an appeal.
“We're disappointed in today's decision, which allows the government to conduct intrusive searches of Americans' laptops and other electronics at the border without any suspicion that those devices contain evidence of wrongdoing,” she said.
“Suspicionless searches of devices containing vast amounts of personal information cannot meet the standard set by the Fourth Amendment... Unfortunately, these searches are part of a broader pattern of aggressive government surveillance that collects information on too many innocent people, under lax standards, and without adequate oversight.”
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/10/definition-insanity-criminally-insane.html
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/01/state-of-oregon-and-courts.html
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/08/constitutional-free-border-united.html
[sidebar: ACLU also retires on the same FRAUD as the FRAUDULENT 'JUDGES'. Judges that abort the U.S. Constitution are simply those NAZI agents that were put into mothballs and taken out for this time. What are the ACLU & Federalists to do once their DIGITAL FRAUD is as impotent for them as IT is? That is the desperation we see to kill the U.S. Constitution AND how insane is THIS? IT is stark raving mad, Activist Judges don't get that every time they destroy the MONEY SOVEREIGNTY, they have nailed their own coffin tightly shut and their families for eons, too are buried alive in DEBT that isn't 'real'. That is how insane America is.]
CONSTITUTIONAL FREE BORDER UNITED STUPID DUH 'MERICA? PORTLAND, OREGON, AND GREEN WASHINGTON STATE READY FOR ALLODIAL TITLE UN?!
DHS ‘Constitution Free’ Zones Inside US Ignored By Media

In what should be front page news blasted out nationwide as a breaking news alert, the DHS has openly established extensive ‘Constitution free zones’ in which your Fourth Amendment does not exist.
It’s not ‘conspiracy’ and it’s not fraud, the DHS has literally created an imaginary ‘border’ within the United States that engulfs 100 miles from every single end of the nation. Within this fabricated ‘border’, the DHS can search your electronic belongings for no reason. We’re talking about no suspicion, no reasonable cause, nothing. No reason whatsoever is required under their own regulations. The DHS is now above the Constitution under their own rules, and even Wired magazine authors were amazed at the level of pure tyranny going on here.
This ‘border’ even includes where the US land meets oceans in addition to legitimate borders with Mexico and Canada. As a result, you have over 197 million citizens suffocated in these 100 mile ‘border zones’ that include major cities like New York City, Houston, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia. Checkout the graphic below for a visual representation, with the orange area representing the Constitution free zone as designated by the DHS:
What’s even more amazing, is that this has been going on since 2008. That’s about 5 years of absolute unconstitutional abuse of power by the Department of Homeland Security that the media fails to even document. That’s 197 million citizens living without a Constitution as far as the DHS is concerned, and apparently the Department of Justice (DOJ) must be pretty content too. Amazingly, no one has challenged this besides the ACLU, which was contacted following the case of a man who was actually detained within the 100 mile ‘border’ area.
Not only was this man’s laptop searched for no reason, as is ‘allowed’ under DHS code now, but they ended up finding pictures designated to be linked up with ‘terrorist’ groups. In response, the man was thrown in a cell while DHS agents went through every piece of data on his entire laptop. The ACLU is now suing over this event, but there’s no telling how the case will go with such limited media exposure. The DHS is literally gutting the Constitution and declaring itself higher than the law of the land by doing this, and it spells out major trouble for the entire Bill of Rights at large.
DHS DISMISSES CONSTITUTION, BILL OF RIGHTS
Because if the DHS can simply ‘overrule’ the Fourth Amendment for 197 million citizens, it can also ‘overrule’ the First and Second Amendments as well. What’s stopping them? It’s highly illegal under the Constitution, but it appears they truly don’t care. And to demonstrate just how little they truly care, they have even gone and ‘reviewed’ themselves for their own actions following outcry from some legal experts.
To break it down: back in 2008 there was outrage from those who actually value the Constitution and understand how the bloated DHS entity works, so the DHS promised to prove within 120 days that what they were doing was constitutional and legal. Years later, the report came out to reveal that the DHS actually reviewed itself and determined that it was acting 100% properly. It also founds that everything it was doing was ‘constitutional’ because it was not actually removing the Constitution from United States soil, only the ‘border’.
The ‘border’ that expands 100 miles and includes 197 million people.
This news should be on the front page of every single news organization in the world, but the sad reality is that it’s not. It’s up to the alternative news, the real news, to report on this. It’s up to me to make videos about this, it’s up to the alternative news to syndicate it out, and it’s up to you to share this. It’s time to reclaim our Constitution and tell the DHS we won’t live in Constitution free zones any longer.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/dhs-constitution-free-zones-inside-us-ignored-by-media/5345308
Dear Justice Owen M. Panner and Governor John Kitzhaber:
During this DHS 'CONSTITUTIONAL FREE ZONE' - FORECLOSURES HAVE UNLAWFULLY ONCE AGAIN DESTROYED ANY SEMBLANCE OF 'SANE'. PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU GONE STARK RAVING MAD KILLING WOMEN, CHILDREN, INNOCENTS.
Portland smack in the MOSSAD ZONE of PAEDOPHILE CULTISTS also known as THE CHOSEN who get to perform a blood ritual on innocents and then take that broken head-brain-mind and make a zombie out of IT.
Former Governor Goldschmidt and Mayor Adams prove the spraying of chemicals and saturation of poisons in the water, food not fit for human consumption GMOs and name a toxic slow death the 'Oregonian' doesn't appear immune to, suicide kits that children can use to die because ? Shoot themselves in the head other young because it's "Mother's Day"? Wondering about the social behavior, where in Dante's Department of Inferno Homeland Insecurity 'ave we been - ARE WE, all these years?
to be continued ...
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
☢Make A Law☢Make A Business☢ ☢Old Jersey Street Saying☢
NEW WORLD ORDER:
~Fooled too many of the people again~
☢http://www.dunwalke.com/resources/people.htm☢
There isn't one positive projection for the situation we're in, in America. The fossils that believed the all powerful mentally ill were going to be allowed to continue on in ITS' criminal insanity, for the sake of Apartheid and Genocide?!REALLY!? AND THE THUGGERY CULT of Racist, Sexist, Supremacists ☢ WHITE MOSTLY TOO ☢ TOO WHITE and the METZITZAH B☢PEH BLOOD RITUAL -- proves the species has met critical mass contempt for 'self' ?
Are we not in reality, the species such as a rose with so many different 'varieties',
.. to be continued, however, the prognosis isn't what we deserve ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








