the Art of 12: February 2014

Friday, February 28, 2014

The Massive PSYOP Employed against Ukraine by GCHQ and NSA

Wayne MADSEN | 28.02.2014



It was only a matter of time. The National Security Agency's British FIVE EYES partner, the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), has now made common cause with another creation of British intelligence, the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. From the time of its creation in 1921 under the aegis of the British Army's Bureau of Psychological Warfare to the present time, the Tavistock Institute has been at the forefront of research into and application of targeted and mass mind control techniques. The institute has cooperated with research entities, including the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and Esalen Institute in the United States, that carry out psychological operations on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency and Department of Defense. The latest tranche of PowerPoint slides revealed by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden shows the similarities between the GCHQ's Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG)'s Human Science Operations Cell (HSOC). The very name «Human Science Operations» appears yanked right from the operational charter of the Tavistock Institute, which includes the ability to engage in «full spectrum domination» by U.S. and U.K. intelligence services, in other words, the two core members of the FIVE EYES alliance. What is most alarming about the most recent disclosure of slides marked SECRET//SI//REL TO USA. FVEY [Special Intelligence, Releasable to USA and FIVE EYES] and UK TOP SECRET STRAP is that the FIVE EYES signals intelligence alliance of the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand are adding psychological operations (psyops) and Tavistock-developed mind control operations to its traditional signals intelligence (SIGINT) role. The blending of SIGINT and human intelligence (HUMINT) as part of cyber-warfare and computer network exploitation (CNE), with little or no actual oversight from legislative oversight authorities, is the closest proof revealed to date that the NSA and its partners have embarked on a policy of instituting «1984» Big Brother controls using the Internet as a primary weapon. The latest tranche of slides points to a number of deception programs being carried out on the web. These include alias development and masquerading (which includes the employment of «sock puppet» personae already in use by the U.S. military to disrupt and influence the Internet), mass messaging (or spamming) and «call bombing,» propaganda, and «pushing stories». These tactics have been refined since the CIA and its George Soros-financed non-governmental organization activist allies brought about the «Arab Spring» overthrow of governments in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, and Yemen, as well as the bloody civil war in Syria. In Ukraine, the democratically-elected government of President Viktor Yanukovych fell more quickly than either Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak or Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi simply because the Western corporate media fully cooperated in FIVE EYES efforts to activate armies of sock puppets with aliases who disseminated anti-Yanukovych propaganda and, with the assistance of the global corporate news media, «pushed stories». In the case of Ukraine, the «pushed stories» were products of CIA, NSA, GCHQ, British MI-6, and Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC) propaganda mills working in close collaboration with such intelligence agency fronts as Soros's Open Society Institute, Freedom House, Hudson Institute, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Heritage Foundation, and Demos of the UK. Western intelligence agencies «pushed stories» through the use of Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, and Youtube. These applications are part and parcel of GCHQ and NSA Computer Network Information Operations (CNIO). Outside the realm of technological warfare, JTRIG admits that it employs «credential harvesting» against «foreign news agencies». In fact, spies and provocateurs masquerading as spies were not only discovered filing phony news reports from Ukraine but also from Venezuela during simultaneous anti-government rioting in that country. Fake journalists were also exposed in Egypt, Thailand, China, and Russia. Two GCHQ programs that were likely used to bombard news organizations with propaganda from the Western-financed Ukrainian opposition are code named INFINITE CURVATURE and MOUNTAIN SLOPE. Without independently verifying what was being disseminated by text messages, email, fax, and phone calls, the global corporate media willingly re-broadcast and re-published FIVE EYES propaganda on the situation in Ukraine as fact. This included such canards as Russian special forces SPETSNAZ snipers shooting dead protesters in Kyiv's Maidan Square (actual reports had neo-Nazi Maidanovci agitators on Maidan Square shooting protesters with the intent that the government security personnel would be blamed), Yanukovych amassing a treasure of expensive paintings and sculptures in the manner of Muammar Qaddafi and Saddam Hussein (in fact, Yanukovych's tastes are more oriented toward kitschy bling than opulent extravagances), and that protesters were set on fire by police. As to the last item, the Associated Press transmitted a photograph of what was described as a protesters in Kyiv running away in flames. In fact, the «protester» was a Ukrainian policeman and his Ukrainian MBC police insignia could readily be seen on his uniform's left sleeve. Where do JTRIG and its Tavistock-trained handlers obtain images, documents, and other information used for propaganda deception and disruption psyops? The answer is found in the latest released slides: the SALAMANCA database of information mined from the Internet. In addition, GHCQ and its NSA allies can target specific cell phones for propaganda dissemination through Target Geographic Identifiers (TGIs) assigned to particular cell phones. Such operations can also be used to disrupt the cell phones of targeted individuals through CNIO disruption. JTRIG's slides point to how network operations are used to support intelligence operations in the field. These operations are identified as infiltration, ruse, set-piece, false flag, false rescue, disruption, and sting. In the case of Ukraine, Western overt and covert agents infiltrated the demonstrators at Maidan Square. In some cases, counter-CNIO operations can be successful against Western intelligence agencies. One video from Maidan Square showed Ukrainian Bercut special police detaining a man who was carrying an 2012 expired International Police Association (IPA) membership credential in the name of Oleksandr Boiarchuk, in addition to an IPA Ukraine chapter badge. IPA stands accused of being a front for Western intelligence agencies. The firing by neo-Nazi snipers on Maidan Square demonstrators qualifies as both a ruse and false flag operation. The overall goal of such an operation was to blame Ukrainian security personnel for the shooting deaths of demonstrators and, as far as the Western media was concerned, the ruse and false flag was successful. One media organization after another likened the shooting deaths to the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989 and Yanukovych was likened to Saddam Hussein and Qaddafi, both of whom fell victim to early embryonic computer network information operations… The Ukraine operation was also in many ways a set-piece operation. A set-piece is a predictable operation that has been successfully employed in the past. Certainly, the Maidan Square uprising was almost a carbon copy, but with much more violence, of the Western-engineered 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine. The same template, developed by the CIA-financed OTPOR provocateurs against the government of Slobodon Milosevic in Serbia and refined by the Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies (CANVAS), was used in «themed revolutions» in Georgia, Iran, Egypt, Tunisia, Syria, Venezuela, Burma, Maldives, Thailand, and other countries, as well as in the latest coup d'etat in Ukraine. Disruption operations were also used at an early stage in Ukraine chiefly by the Soros- and Zionist-funded FEMEN movement, an anti-Christian and anti-Muslim group that works closely with Pussy Riot and Voina social order disruptors in Russia. Attacks by FEMEN on symbols of Christianity in Ukraine helped spark the social disorder that ultimately led to the rioting in central Kyiv. Neo-Nazi and extreme right-wing Ukrainian nationalists became agitated by the attacks on Christian crosses and churches in the country and cited the overt support that Zionist Jews like American Jed Sunden, an investor in Ukrainian media companies like the Kyiv Post, gave to FEMEN protesters. Employing agents from neo-Nazi, Zionist, and nationalist factions is spelled out by one JTRIG slide, which calls for the «identification and exploitation of fracture points» in a targeted country, region, or other element. The intent of such exploitation is to create «tension» through the use of «pre-existing cleavages» and competing «ideological differences». These factors are coupled with «things that push a group together» like «shared opposition» and «common beliefs». These exploitation factors were of beneficial use in the type of successful intelligence operation that took place in Ukraine. Other tactics employed by the Human System Analysis (HSA) Online Covert Action (OCA) personnel of GCHQ and NSA are the setting up of targets in «honey traps» (the use of lures who use sex to entrap targeted individuals); changing photographs on social networking sites using sophisticated Photoshop-lime techniques; establishing blogs purporting to be those of a target's victim or victims; and e-mailing and texting false and defamatory information to the friends, colleagues, and neighbors of a target. These tactics bring to the Internet familiar physical «dirty tricks» operations used in the past by human intelligence field agents. Other areas where JTRIG and Tavistock have commonality are the use of «herding» and «group dynamics» to create «group think» among targeted audiences. The quickness by the general population to accept everything written and broadcast about the situation in Ukraine serves as a case in point. Only alternative media provided unbiased facts about what was occurring in Ukraine without the color of intelligence agency propaganda. However, JTRIG has a rapid response mechanism for alternate news reports: it calls for the use of «conspiracy stories» to influence thoughts and behavior. Either alternative news reports are derided as conspiracy theories by the GCHQ and NSA influence operations organizations or the intelligence agencies, themselves, put forward conspiracy stories to muddy the waters. JTRIG also relies on the Hofstede Dimensions of Dutch psychologist Geert Hofstede, which call for the employment of cross-cultural «collectivism» or «group think» to achieve psychological goals. Such practices represent pure Tavistock dogma. This, in addition to JTRIG's desire to perform «cyber magic» on the Internet, arrives full circle at Tavistock's reliance on the occult to extend its ability to mold opinions and behaviors across large swaths of the global population. Tavistock tactics were instrumental in manufacturing popular consent for World War II, the Cold War, the «Global War on Terrorism,» the Balkans War, central African conflicts, and the two Western wars against Iraq. More recently, Tavistock methods, refined and employed by GCHQ and NSA, were used during the Arab Spring movement and the recent upheaval in Ukraine. The melding of SIGINT, HUMINT, and Tavistock mind-bending technology represents a dangerous move by Western intelligence agencies into an arena that may suffer from tremendous blowback. The social disruption visited by the use of such practices in Libya and Syria resulted in civil war. Ukraine may also descend into civil war among competing nationalities and language groups in a manner similar to Yugoslavia.

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/02/28/massive-psyop-employed-against-ukraine-by-gchq-and-nsa.html

Michelle Obama and The Revenge of the ‘Knuckleheads’

The First Lady is in the news again, and for all the wrong reasons…

This week, Michelle Obama appeared on The Tonight Show, hosted by Jimmy Fallon, to discuss her challenges of ‘life in the White House’ and also to plug her new “Let’s Move” campaign. Then came the train wreck – her suicidal gaff insinuating that America’s youth are stupid, can’t cook for themselves, spend their time drunk dancing on bar stools and in her eyes – are a bunch of “knuckleheads”. Yes, she did actually say that.

To appear on a major talk show and put down the very voting bloc who crowned her as American royalty, really takes some front. Watch…http://youtu.be/dH_LvV5Cm_w

As annoying as TV host Jimmy Fallon is (lacking the class and wittiness of predecessors like Johnny Carson), he is what he is, and is because every minute of every day in LA everyone tells him how cool and how funny he is, even if he’s not. It doesn’t really matter if he’s either of those things, because he’s famous. That’s standard in Hollywood.

But that’s not exactly the case for Michelle Obama, who resides in the world politics. Although she is partly cloaked in celebrity, unlike Jimmy, what you see with Michelle is actually real, and her berating, sweeping generalizations of America’s youth hasn’t done her any favors in the war for hearts and minds. Judging from the First Lady’s comments sans post-comment spin, it really says a lot about where her head is generally at. You just get the impression that she is a very unhappy person.

White House spin doctors can try to patch up the damage by making the rather lame excuse that, “It was just a joke”, but that can’t cover-up the bitterness and cutting political divisiveness on display. The proper thing to do is an apology to the American people, but of course, this breaks the cardinal Obama White House rule of, ‘why ever admit you have made a grave error when you can just talk around it’?

Some valuable advice to the First Lady: the next time you’re sent on the White House Agitprop tour, remember that it pays to be extra gracious when you are in power – otherwise you’ll end up getting humiliated by a barrage of video blogs, like this one from a 20-year old student from the University of Colorado: http://youtu.be/2VRzFBM6mUY

There was something desperate about her public tirade on the Tonight Show, an evident nastiness in her tone which made for very uncomfortable viewing. Despite the $5,000 dress, she still came out like a snapping turtle. Maybe she was nervous, but then again, no – she has done much bigger gigs before. America saw glimpses of this before during her husband’s campaign trail, with various quips and cuts, like when the would-be First Lady gushed, “For the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country…”, meaning she’s finally happy after 30 years of adult life because she’s part of the executive.
Even after being crowned Queen of Pennsylvania Avenue, she couldn’t stop using the race card widget either, an easy lay-up in political terms - as she continued to harp on that the system was still ‘holding back’ her and the President (as if), and that even today, “As a black man, Barack could still get shot just going to the gas station”…

Then there was the incident with the First Lady attending a ceremony honoring those who perished on 9/11. After the Stars and Stripes had been folded by police and firefighters, she quipped, “All this for a flag,” before pursing her lips and shaking her head from side to side – while the husband nods up and down. You’d think she was from Europe and just arrived in the US.

After achieving power and status, there are those who feel compelled to ‘talk down’ to people they feel are now below them. This is nothing new and should shock no one, as it’s something we see every day in our lives. But when it’s done in front of a camera on prime time, it demonstrates an edginess unbecoming of a First Lady. Some might call this a character flaw, or maybe a lack of grace.

What’s clearer than ever though, is that this incident should demonstrate to Americans the visible lack of confidence the President and his clique have in Obamacare. When you have to send your wife to do the late night TV rounds to hard sell after it’s already been passed into law – then there’s something seriously wrong with it.

Like most career lawyers and politicians who’ve never been innovators or had to sell anything other than themselves, Michelle really struggled with the hard sell:

“Well, thanks to the Affordable Care Act, young people can stay on their parents’ insurance until they are 26,” said the first lady of the United States… but once they hit 26 – they’re on their own. And a lot young people think they’re invincible. But the truth is, young people are knuckleheads.”

No, the truth is, Obamacare is shamelessly political, and just divisive. The White House brain trust only put that line item in to ‘cover’ those up to 26 years of age because they wanted those votes. After Obama leaves office, the social engineers will continue to play with that number like an electoral slide rule.

Like nearly every other political creature inhabiting Washington DC reality bubble these days – the First Lady is out of touch with America and Americans. What, with all the fashion stylists, and the hair stylists, the free designer handbags, shoes, dresses, and jewelry, the manicurists, the pedicurists, the pop stars and the nutritionists, and the fitness instructors, and the bodyguards, the Michael Jackson-sized entourage, having your dog chauffeured to Martha’s Vineyard in an Osprey helicopter, the Spanish Villa vacations, the Hawaiian outings, the $100 million African vacations and most importantly… the best healthcare money can afford in the United States - who can blame her? She’s just a product of the bloated federal beast and political celebrity culture that successive administrations have erected for themselves in the DC.

AMERICA’S YOUTH HAVE NO TIME FOR THE FIRST LADY’S INSENSITIVE REMARKS.

Who’s the real knucklehead now?

Somehow you get the feeling that when (or if?) the First Family pack up and leave in January 2016, that Michelle will be angling for an open Senate seat in Illinois, following the Hillary blueprint.

And why not? Being First Lady is such a great qualification for career in power politics.

READ MORE OBAMA NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Obama Files<< February 28, 2014

The Federal Reserve’s Transcripts: The Greatest Propaganda Coup of Our Time? The New York Times and the Fed's Transcripts By Mike Whitney Global Research, February 28, 2014

There’s good propaganda and bad propaganda. Bad propaganda is generally crude, amateurish Judy Miller “mobile weapons lab-type” nonsense that figures that people are so stupid they’ll believe anything that appears in “the paper of record.” Good propaganda, on the other hand, uses factual, sometimes documented material in a coordinated campaign with the other major media to cobble-together a narrative that is credible, but false.

[sidebar#1: First, Michael Whitney is one of my favorite American writers. He has been an incredible voice in the FRAUD exposure. He lives in WASHINGTON STATE, one of the worst offenders of the CONTAMINATION CLUB OF ROME! aka The ROYAL FLU$H of Metzitzah b'peh practitioners! Now, this is for Michael -- THERE IS NO GOOD PROPAGANDA. Sorry for shouting but, you clearly haven't read the PROPAGANDA via Edward Bernays as carefully as those that have also worked in the SO CALLED 'PROFESSIONS' in the U$A? IE EG 'LEGAL TRIBE' and of course the FINANCIAL TRIBE, Et Al!

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/02/edward-bernays-updated-22414-men-with.html

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/02/crystallizing-public-opinion-propaganda.html]

The so called Fed’s transcripts, which were released last week, fall into the latter category. The transcripts (1,865 pages) reveal the details of 14 emergency meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) in 2008, when the financial crisis was at its peak and the Fed braintrust was deliberating on how best to prevent a full-blown meltdown. But while the conversations between the members are accurately recorded, they don’t tell the gist of the story or provide the context that’s needed to grasp the bigger picture. Instead, they’re used to portray the members of the Fed as affable, well-meaning bunglers who did the best they could in ‘very trying circumstances’. While this is effective propaganda, it’s basically a lie, mainly because it diverts attention from the Fed’s role in crashing the financial system, preventing the remedies that were needed from being implemented (nationalizing the giant Wall Street banks), and coercing Congress into approving gigantic, economy-killing bailouts which shifted trillions of dollars to insolvent financial institutions that should have been euthanized.

[sidebar#2: That was and is the intention, Michael - GENOCIDE. The APARTHEID? Please review carefully STATE OF WASHINGTON and,

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/01/washington-state-british-accredited.html

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/01/fiat-money-wa-bar-corruption.html]

What I’m saying is that the Fed’s transcripts are, perhaps, the greatest propaganda coup of our time.

[sidebar#3: No, Michael, what the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM (FRS) has done is taken the United States of America and made what IT is, GULAG GLOBAL BIG GOV FRAUD 'MONEY'!

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/11/murderers-craig-osth-and-his-allies-cia.html

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/11/cliff-high-media-fire-wujo-grand-penis.html

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/11/capitalism-no-dehumanization-via.html

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/04/daniel-n-gordon-misfortunes-best-friend.html

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/04/metzitzah-bpeh-update-april-2-2013-baby.html

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/04/circumcision-aka-metzitzah-bpeh-federal.html

New York BAR #1064252: NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, U S DISTRICT JUDGE, US COURT HOUSE, 500 PEARL ST, NEW YORK, NY 10007-1316, (212) 805-0194, Year Admitted in NY: 1968, Law School: COLUMBIA]

They take advantage of the fact that people simply forget a lot of what happened during the crisis and, as a result, absolve the Fed of any accountability for what is likely the crime of the century. It’s an accomplishment that PR-pioneer Edward Bernays would have applauded. After all, it was Bernays who argued that the sheeple need to be constantly bamboozled to keep them in line. Here’s a clip from his magnum opus “Propaganda”:

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”

Sound familiar? My guess is that Bernays’ maxim probably features prominently in editors offices across the country where “manufacturing consent” is Job 1 and where no story so trivial that it can’t be spun in a way that serves the financial interests of the MSM’s constituents. (Should I say “clients”?) The Fed’s transcripts are just a particularly egregious example. Just look at the coverage in the New York Times and judge for yourself. Here’s an excerpt from an article titled “Fed Misread Crisis in 2008, Records Show”:

“The hundreds of pages of transcripts, based on recordings made at the time, reveal the ignorance of Fed officials about economic conditions during the climactic months of the financial crisis. Officials repeatedly fretted about overstimulating the economy, only to realize time and again that they needed to redouble efforts to contain the crisis.” (“Fed Misread Crisis in 2008, Records Show”, New York Times)

This quote is so misleading on so many levels it’s hard to know where to begin.

First of all, the New York Times is the ideological wellspring of elite propaganda in the US. They set the tone and the others follow. That’s the way the system works. So it always pays to go to the source and try to figure out what really lies behind the words, that is, the motive behind the smokescreen of half-truths, distortions, and lies. How is the Times trying to bend perceptions and steer the public in their corporate-friendly direction, that’s the question. In this case, the Times wants its readers to believe that the Fed members “misread the crisis”; that they were ‘behind the curve’ and stressed-out, but–dad-gum-it–they were trying their level-best to make things work out for everybody.

[sidebar#4:

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/01/crystal-cox-great-american-sirus-star.html

Crystal COX in the State of Oregon was all but killed dead. She survived the OREGON CORRUPTED VILEEVIL and now the STATE OF ORYGONE wants her dead! Of course the dead get to bury the dead? Jesus said that, but what do the words mean?]

How believable is that? Not very believable at all.

Keep in mind, the crisis had been going on for a full year before the discussions in these transcripts took place, so it’s not like the members were plopped in a room the day before Lehman blew up and had to decide what to do. No. They had plenty of time to figure out the lay of the land, get their bearings and do what was in the best interests of the country. Here’s more from the Times:

”My initial takeaway from these voluminous transcripts is that they paint a disturbing picture of a central bank that was in the dark about each looming disaster throughout 2008. That meant that the nation’s top bank regulators were unprepared to deal with the consequences of each new event.”

Have you ever read such nonsense in your life? Of course, the Fed knew what was going on. How could they NOT know? Their buddies on Wall Street were taking it in the stern sheets every time their dingy asset pile was downgraded which was every damn day. It was costing them a bundle which means they were probably on the phone 24-7 to (Treasury Secretary) Henry Paulson whining for help. “You gotta give us a hand here, Hank. The whole Street is going toes-up. Please.”
Here’s more from the NYT:

“Some Fed officials have argued that the Fed was blind in 2008 because it relied, like everyone else, on a standard set of economic indicators. As late as August 2008, “there were no clear signs that many financial firms were about to fail catastrophically,” Mr. Bullard said in a November presentation in Arkansas that the St. Louis Fed recirculated on Friday. “There was a reasonable case that the U.S. could continue to ‘muddle through.’ (“Fed Misread Crisis in 2008, Records Show”, New York Times)

There’s that same refrain again, “Blind”, “In the dark”, “Behind the curve”, “Misread the crisis”.
Notice how the Times only invokes terminology that implies the Fed is blameless. But it’s all baloney. Everyone knew what was going on. Check out this excerpt from a post by Nouriel Roubini that was written nearly a full year before Lehman failed:

“The United States has now effectively entered into a serious and painful recession. The debate is not anymore on whether the economy will experience a soft landing or a hard landing; it is rather on how hard the hard landing recession will be. The factors that make the recession inevitable include the nation’s worst-ever housing recession, which is still getting worse; a severe liquidity and credit crunch in financial markets that is getting worse than when it started last summer; high oil and gasoline prices; falling capital spending by the corporate sector; a slackening labor market where few jobs are being created and the unemployment rate is sharply up; and shopped-out, savings-less and debt-burdened American consumers who — thanks to falling home prices — can no longer use their homes as ATM machines to allow them to spend more than their income. As private consumption in the US is over 70% of GDP the US consumer now retrenching and cutting spending ensures that a recession is now underway.
On top of this recession there are now serious risks of a systemic financial crisis in the US as the financial losses are spreading from subprime to near prime and prime mortgages, consumer debt (credit cards, auto loans, student loans), commercial real estate loans, leveraged loans and postponed/restructured/canceled LBO and, soon enough, sharply rising default rates on corporate bonds that will lead to a second round of large losses in credit default swaps. The total of all of these financial losses could be above $1 trillion thus triggering a massive credit crunch and a systemic financial sector crisis.” ( Nouriel Roubini Global EconoMonitor)

Roubini didn’t have some secret source for data that wasn’t available to the Fed. The financial system was collapsing and it had been collapsing for a full year. Everyone who followed the markets knew it. Hell, the Fed had already opened its Discount Window and the Term Auction Facility (TAF) in 2007 to prop up the ailing banks–something they’d never done before– so they certainly knew the system was cratering. So, why’s the Times prattling this silly fairytale that “the Fed was in the dark” in 2008?
I’ll tell you why: It’s because this whole transcript business is a big, freaking whitewash to absolve the shysters at the Fed of any legal accountability, that’s why. That’s why they’re stitching together this comical fable that the Fed was simply an innocent victim of circumstances beyond its control. And that’s why they want to focus attention on the members of the FOMC quibbling over meaningless technicalities –like non-existent inflation or interest rates–so people think they’re just kind-hearted buffoons who bumbled-along as best as they could. It’s all designed to deflect blame.
Don’t get me wrong; I’m not saying these conversations didn’t happen. They did, at least I think they did. I just think that the revisionist media is being employed to spin the facts in a way that minimizes the culpability of the central bank in its dodgy, collaborationist engineering of the bailouts. (You don’t hear the Times talking about Hank Paulson’s 50 or 60 phone calls to G-Sax headquarters in the week before Lehman kicked the bucket, do you? But, that’s where a real reporter would look for the truth.)

[sidebar#5:

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/02/arnold-j-toynbee-study-in-contact-of.html

Michael, this is a long time AGENDA. The FRS is a very exposed CRIMINAL RICO GLOBAL and this isn't other than what IT is: NEW YORK TIMES' GANG IN THE BLACK-WHITE-RED and all over earth world the scum and worst filth of the human being species sells the APARTHEID and GENOCIDE that has made the FRS and ITS' SLOBS from the EU and ITS' BLOB from the U$A, into the most brain dead we could ever imagine. And in control, imagine THIS. In a word, impotent. America is an impotent organ of Israel.]

The purpose of the NYT article is to create plausible deniability for the perpetrators of the biggest ripoff in world history, a ripoff which continues to this very day since the same policies are in place, the same thieving fraudsters are being protected from prosecution, and the same boundless chasm of private debt is being concealed through accounting flim-flam to prevent losses to the insatiable bondholders who have the country by the balls and who set policy on everything from capital requirements on complex derivatives to toppling democratically-elected governments in Ukraine. These are the big money guys behind the vacillating-hologram poseurs like Obama and Bernanke, who are nothing more than kowtowing sock puppets who jump whenever they’re told. Here’s more bunkum from the Gray Lady:

”By early March, the Fed was moving to replace investors as a source of funding for Wall Street.
Financial firms, particularly in the mortgage business, were beginning to fail because they could not borrow money. Investors had lost confidence in their ability to predict which loans would be repaid. Countrywide Financial, the nation’s largest mortgage lender, sold itself for a relative pittance to Bank of America. Bear Stearns, one of the largest packagers and sellers of mortgage-backed securities, was teetering toward collapse.
On March 7, the Fed offered companies up to $200 billion in funding. Three days later, Mr. Bernanke secured the Fed policy-making committee’s approval to double that amount to $400 billion, telling his colleagues, “We live in a very special time.”
Finally, on March 16, the Fed effectively removed any limit on Wall Street funding even as it arranged the Bear Stearns rescue.” (“Fed Misread Crisis in 2008, Records Show”, New York Times)

[sidebar#6: PLEASE! IMAGINATION IS ALL POWERFUL POWER. Now that the TIMES has convinced the majority of the ZIONIST JEWS to bow and scrape the filth from toilet upon toilet of empty other than the U$A PETRO$! We have a nation of imbeciles that worship digital DEBT and call the FRAUD 'CREDIT'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]

This part deserves a little more explanation. The author says “the Fed was moving to replace investors as a source of funding for Wall Street.” Uh, yeah; because the whole flimsy house of cards came crashing down when investors figured out Wall Street was peddling toxic assets. So the money dried up. No one buys crap assets after they find out they’re crap; it’s a simple fact of life. The Times makes this sound like this was some kind of unavoidable natural disaster, like an earthquake or a tornado. It wasn’t. It was a crime, a crime for which no one has been indicted or sent to prison. That might have been worth mentioning, don’t you think?

More from the NYT: “…on March 16, the Fed effectively removed any limit on Wall Street funding even as it arranged the Bear Stearns rescue.”

Yipee! Free money for all the crooks who blew up the financial system and plunged the economy into recession. The Fed assumed blatantly-illegal powers it was never provided under its charter and used them to reward the people who were responsible for the crash, namely, the Fed’s moneybags constituents on Wall Street. It was a straightforward transfer of wealth to the Bank Mafia. Don’t you think the author should have mentioned something about that, just for the sake of context, maybe?

[sidebar#7: BERNANKE threw the so called AMERICAN DOLLAR into wherever world earth could spend the FRAUD. And, of course the FRAUD was started a long time ago and the NIXON ADMINISTRATION was as bad as it gets, too.

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/09/keeper-of-holy-flame-see-pentagon-usa.html

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2013/10/dr-fritz-kraemer-true-keeper-of-holy_9.html]

Again, the Times wants us to believe that the men who made these extraordinary decisions were just ordinary guys like you and me trying to muddle through a rough patch doing the best they could.

[sidebar#8: http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/02/abel-danger-2-26-2014-with-karen-hudes.htm l]

Right. I mean, c’mon, this is some pretty impressive propaganda, don’t you think? It takes a real talent to come up with this stuff, which is why most of these NYT guys probably got their sheepskin at Harvard or Yale, the establishment’s petri-dish for serial liars.

By September 2008, Bernanke and Paulson knew the game was over. The crisis had been raging for more than a year and the nation’s biggest banks were broke. (Bernanke even admitted as much in testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission in 2011 when he said “only one ….out of maybe the 13 of the most important financial institutions in the United States…was not at serious risk of failure within a period of a week or two.” He knew the banks were busted, and so did Paulson.) Their only chance to save their buddies was a Hail Mary pass in the form of Lehman Brothers. In other words, they had to create a “Financial 9-11″, a big enough crisis to blackmail congress into $700 no-strings-attached bailout called the TARP. And it worked too. They pushed Lehman to its death, scared the bejesus out of congress, and walked away with 700 billion smackers for their shifty gangster friends on Wall Street. Chalk up one for Hank and Bennie.

The only good thing to emerge from the Fed’s transcripts is that it proves that the people who’ve been saying all along that Lehman was deliberately snuffed-out in order to swindle money out of congress were right. Here’s how economist Dean Baker summed it up the other day on his blog:

“Gretchen Morgensen (NYT financial reporter) picks up an important point in the Fed transcripts from 2008. The discussion around the decision to allow Lehman to go bankrupt makes it very clear that it was a decision. In other words the Fed did not rescue Lehman because it chose not to.
This is important because the key regulators involved in this decision, Ben Bernanke, Hank Paulson, and Timothy Geithner, have been allowed to rewrite history and claim that they didn’t rescue Lehman because they lacked the legal authority to rescue it. This is transparent tripe, which should be evident to any knowledgeable observer.” (“The Decision to Let Lehman Fail”, Dean Baker, CEPR)

Here’s the quote from Morgenson’s piece to which Baker is alluding:

“In public statements since that time, the Fed has maintained that the government didn’t have the tools to save Lehman. These documents appear to tell a different story. Some comments made at the Sept. 16 meeting, directly after Lehman filed for bankruptcy, indicate that letting Lehman fail was more of a policy decision than a passive one.” (“A New Light on Regulators in the Dark”, Gretchen Morgenson, New York Times)

Ah ha! So it was a planned demolition after all. At least that’s settled.
Here’s something else you’ll want to know: It was always within Bernanke’s power to stop the bank run and end to the panic, but if he relieved the pressure in the markets too soon (he figured), then Congress wouldn’t cave in to his demands and approve the TARP. Because, at the time, a solid majority of Republicans and Democrats in congress were adamantly opposed to the TARP and even voted it down on the first ballot. Here’s a clip from a speech by, Rep Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) in September 2008 which sums up the grassroots opposition to the bailouts:

“The $700 bailout bill is being driven by fear not fact. This is too much money, in too short of time, going to too few people, while too many questions remain unanswered. Why aren’t we having hearings…Why aren’t we considering any other alternatives other than giving $700 billion to Wall Street? Why aren’t we passing new laws to stop the speculation which triggered this? Why aren’t we putting up new regulatory structures to protect the investors? Why aren’t we directly helping homeowners with their debt burdens? Why aren’t we helping American families faced with bankruptcy? Isn’t time for fundamental change to our debt-based monetary system so we can free ourselves from the manipulation of the Federal Reserve and the banks? Is this the US Congress or the Board of Directors of Goldman Sachs?”

But despite overwhelming public resistance, the TARP was pushed through and Wall Street prevailed. mainly by sabotaging the democratic process the way they always do when it doesn’t suit their objectives.)

Of course, as we said earlier, Bernanke never really needed the money from TARP to stop the panic anyway. (Not one penny of the $700 bil was used to shore up the money markets or commercial paper markets where the bank run took place.) All Bernanke needed to do was to provide backstops for those two markets and, Voila, the problem was solved. Here’s Dean Baker with the details:

“Bernanke deliberately misled Congress to help pass the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). He told them that the commercial paper market was shutting down, raising the prospect that most of corporate America would be unable to get the short-term credit needed to meet its payroll and pay other bills. Bernanke neglected to mention that he could singlehandedly keep the commercial paper market operating by setting up a special Fed lending facility for this purpose. He announced the establishment of a lending facility to buy commercial paper the weekend after Congress approved TARP.” (“Ben Bernanke; Wall Street’s Servant”, Dean Baker, Guardian)

So, there you have it. The American people were fleeced in broad daylight by the same dissembling cutthroats the NYT is now trying to characterize as well-meaning bunglers who were just trying to save the country from another Great Depression.
I could be wrong, but I think we’ve reached Peak Propaganda on this one.
(Note: By “good” propaganda, I mean “effective” propaganda. From an ethical point of view, propaganda can never be good because its objective is to intentionally mislead people…..which is bad.)

Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.

[sidebar#9: There are nine compartments in our brain/s. We don't use but, maybe 7%? Probably not even that percentage due to all the EXPERIMENTATION. The American population isn't well educated and not well informed. Had to work in the INDUSTRIES OF FRAUD (Lieyers' 'color over the rule of law due process', Doctors' MENGELE so called 'medicine', Fiduciary/ies' FRAUDULENT DEBT-CREDIT sold with interest into perpetuity and we got what we have here due to being COMATOSE and worse), to get how corrupt and contaminated the U$A truly is. Begin with the fact, that, APARTHEID is the so called system of COURTS AND ATTORNEYS LICENSED AT THE BRITISH ACCREDITED REGISTRY.

Come now, when do we awaken the higher well-educated such as MIKE WHITNEY so he can truly reach those that are intellectually drawn to his level of understanding the - nouns, vowels, adjectives, pronouns, consonants, Et Al, Et Cetera. AND, the ENGLISH LANGUAGE has been exalted as though a form of communication to cooperate as a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!?

GET MADDER THAN HELL AMERICA. The TIMES' won't print the true REVOLUTION!

We need to simply reboot the U.S. Constitution's GOOD LAW and arrest, prosecute and incarcerate all the traitors into the FEMA CAMPS made specially for 'they-them-those' that BE LIE VE in the greatest APARTHEID-GENOCIDE GLOBAL just because the form of Homo Sapiens' mass murdering has become a very established criminally insane practice.]

... to be continued ....

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Abel Danger 2-26-2014 With Karen Hudes | BANK OF AMERICA TO BE TAKEN DOWN AND RENAMED WASHINGTON FEDERAL. SOME TRANSFERS HAVE ALREADY OCCURED |

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Video: Abel Danger With Karen Hudes 2-26-2014 - Exposing Banksters Joint Chief Martin Dempsey<<

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room

Video: Abel Danger With Karen Hudes 2-26-2014

Exposing Banksters Joint Chief Martin Dempsey

Posted By: Lion, Wed, 26-Feb-2014, John MacHaffie at 10:37 AM

Vladimir Putin's Ukraine dilemma: How to react? | Russian leader likely to adopt wait-and-see approach to Ukraine crisis

By Matt Kwong, CBC News Posted: Feb 25, 2014 5:39 AM ET Last Updated: Feb 25, 2014 11:40 AM ET

Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, left, winks in a 2013 photo to his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. Yanukovych is now in hiding following his ouster and allegations of mass murder.

Analysts say Russia is not likely to seek his prosecution, though it is not likely to support him either. (Sergei Karpukhin/Reuters)

Russian President Vladimir Putin has a favourite saying: "The weak get beaten."
It's a thought that Moscow might be weighing, amid the turmoil and revolution in Ukraine that led to the ouster of President Viktor Yanukovych from Kyiv.

'The next step is people either say, ‘If Yanukovych can be [ousted], then maybe Putin can be as well,' or, ‘If Ukraine can split away from the Russian orbit, maybe we can, too'—Jeff Sahadeo, director of the Institute of European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at Carleton University

The prospect of Russia surrendering its influence on its smaller and less economically stable neighbour raises questions about how Putin will respond to the crisis over the border, according to analysts specializing in eastern European politics.
"The thinking is, if Putin loses Ukraine, what can he hold onto at this point?" said Jeff Sahadeo, director of the Institute of European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at Carleton University.
"Then the next step is people either say, ‘If Yanukovych can be [ousted], then maybe Putin can be as well,' or, ‘If Ukraine can split away from the Russian orbit, maybe we can, too.'"

Meanwhile, Sahadeo said, Putin will be facing calls from pro-Russian populations in eastern Ukraine to intervene in some way.

"The question is how do you do it?" he said.

Russian leaders in the Kremlin are likely debating a course of action, but haven’t decided how to proceed. That’s been clear based on Putin’s conspicuous silence on the matter, experts say.

Shutting off gas supplies

There are certain levers at Putin’s disposal, namely Russia's control of natural gas and energy supplies, which Ukraine and Europe are reliant upon. Kyiv already owes a hefty gas debt to Russian firms.

But shutting access to Ukraine would also hurt Russia’s economy.

"It would be shooting itself in the foot, because two-thirds of Russian gas exports to Europe go through Ukraine," said Taras Kuzio, a research associate with the Canadian Institute for Ukrainian Studies.

Russian President Vladimir Putin will be weighing his options over how to respond to the crisis in Ukraine. (Yves Herman/Reuters)

As for the possibility of Russian military intervention, Kuzio said such a thought would be "fanciful" owing to the risks involved.

Sahadeo agreed that sending in Russian troops would almost amount to war.

A wait-and-see diplomatic approach could be a wiser move.

Yanukovych is in hiding, accused of mass murder in the killings of anti-government protesters, and Russia appears to be losing its grip in a tug-of-war against the European Union for Ukraine.

"At the moment, really, Russia is in a state of shock," said Andrew Wood, a former British ambassador to Moscow from 1995 to 2000, and currently an associate fellow at the independent London-based think-tank Chatham House.

"Russia has to decide whether it will retreat into basic grievance, or adjust to the fact that Ukraine … is not a state which is simply passive for the Russians and the West to contend over."

Tymoshenko, the devil you know

Ukraine’s parliament has set May 25 as the date for early presidential elections to find a successor to replace Yanukovych.

1 of 20

Putin could hope for a democratically elected candidate to come into power by that time who would be more sympathetic to Russian interests. Governor of the pro-Russian Kharkov region, Mikhail Dobkin, who announced his intention to run, could be one such choice, Sahadeo said.

Another possibility would be former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, released from prison over the weekend following corruption allegations linked with a Russian gas deal.

However, Tymoshenko’s time may have passed, and Ukrainians may still perceive her as a corrupt figure who also may have health issues.

"I don’t think she’s burned all her bridges with Putin, but she’s a naturally fiery and combative person," Sahadeo said.

"Putin would have to swallow his pride and say, "At least it’s the devil I know."

As for Yanukovych, who was last seen in the Russian-friendly Crimea, he will probably be on his own at this point, said Kuzio, with the Canadian Institute for Ukrainian Studies.

Ukraine 'the biggest prize'

Even Yanukovych’s own Party of Regions has turned its back on him.

"The Kremlin views him as somebody who wasn’t tough enough, who could have killed more people to suppress what they see as a fascist coup d’état supported by the West," Kuzio said.

That doesn’t necessarily mean Russian authorities would go so far as to apprehend Yanukovych.

Ukraine calls for snap presidential elections

It would be easy for him to find protection in the Crimea, where Russia's Black Sea naval fleet is based.

One way or another, the stakes are high for Russia, Sahadeo said. The West has already exerted influence over swaths of eastern Europe, with the Baltic states having already joined NATO and the EU, and Moldova and Georgia having signed EU state agreements.

But Ukraine represents "the biggest prize," sharing an emotional connection with Russia as "the heartland of Kyivan Rus'," Sahadeo said, referring to the medieval east Slavic state.

While the Kremlin fretted about a potential terrorist attack during the Sochi Winter Olympics undermining Putin’s image, Sahadeo said, the reality is the loss of Ukraine would do far more damage.

"He can blame outside elements all he wants, but rhetoric won’t do anything in this cause, because it’s clear that’s consensus in parliament and in Kyiv that Ukraine can be taken into a different direction," he said.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/vladimir-putin-s-ukraine-dilemma-how-to-react-1.2549953

The Clinton-Pinchuk connection


Viktor Pinchuk

At the table in Kiev where the formal agreement between the government, the opposition, the European Union and Russia was negotiated, there officially sat no representative of the powerful international oligarchy which – with closer ties to Washington and NATO than to Brussels and the EU - is pushing Ukraine towards the West.

An emblematic case is Viktor Pinchuk, steel magnate, 54, ranked by Forbes magazine among the richest men in the world.

Pinchuk started amassing his fortune in 2002 when he married Elena, daughter of Leonid Kuchma, the second President of Ukraine (1994-2005). In 2004 his illustrious father-in-law privatized Kryvorizhstal, the largest steel plant in Ukrainia, by selling it to the Interpipe Group, co-owned by his son-in-law, for USD 800 million, about one sixth of its real value. Interpipe thus gained monopoly power over steel pipe production. In 2007, Pinchuk founded EastOne Group Ltd., an international investment advisory company, which provides to multinationals all the tools for penetrating the economies of the East. At the same time, he became the owner of four TV channels plus a popular tabloid (Facts and Comments) with a circulation topping one million copies. Without however neglecting charity, he created the Viktor Pinchuk Foundation, said to be the largest private Ukrainian « philanthropic organization. »

It is through this foundation that Pinchuk bonded with the Clintons, by supporting the Clinton Global Initiative established in 2005 by Bill and Hillary, whose mission is to "convene global leaders to create and implement innovative solutions to the world’s most pressing challenges." Behind this shimmering slogan lies the real goal: to create a strong international support network for Hillary Clinton, the former first lady who, after serving as New York Senator in 2001-2009 and Secretary of State in 2009-2013, is undertaking her second climb to the presidency.

Their fruitful collaboration began in 2007 when Bill Clinton thanked "Viktor and Elena Pinchuk for their vigorous social activity and the support provided to our international program." That Pinchuk support translates into a first 5 million dollar contribution, followed by others, to the Clinton Global Initiative. This opened the doors to Pinchuk in Washington: for 40,000 dollars a month, he hired lobbyist Daniel E. Schoen, who organized a series of contacts with influential figures, including a dozen meetings in one year, between 2011 and 2012, with State Department officials. This proved to be excellent for business, allowing Pinchuk to increase his exports to the United States, although metallurgists in Pennsylvania and Ohio now accuse him of undercutting U.S. steel tube prices.

To further strengthen his ties with the United States and the West, Pinchuk launched the Yalta European Strategy (YES), "Eastern Europe’s largest social institution of public diplomacy," whose official objective is to "help Ukraine develop into a modern, democratic and economically efficient country." Thanks to Pinchuk’s financial capacity (he just splurged more than $ 5 million for his 50th birthday celebration in a posh French ski resort), the YES was in a position to set up a wide network of international contacts , which came to light at the annual meeting held in Yalta. It brought together "over 200 politicians, diplomats, statesmen, journalists, analysts and business leaders from more than 20 countries." Among these, the names that most stand out are Hillary and Bill Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Tony Blair, George Soros, José Manuel Barroso and Mario Monti ( who attended the meeting last September), alongside other lesser-known characters, but not any less influential, including leaders of the International Monetary Fund.

As Condoleezza Rice put it at the YES meeting in 2012, "Democratic transformations require time, require patience, require support. From outside as well as from inside." An excellent summary of the strategy adopted by the West under the cloak of "outside support" to promote "democratic change." A strategy amply consolidated from Yugoslavia to Libya, from Syria to Ukraine, which consists in driving a wedge between the cracks existing in any State and shake up its foundations by supporting or fomenting anti-government riots (like those in Kiev, too punctual and organized to be considered as merely spontaneous ), underpinned by a fever-pitch media campaign against the government marked for elimination. As regards Ukraine, the objective is to bring down the State or break it in two: one part that would join NATO and the EU; one that would remain largely connected to Russia. The Yalta European Strategy of the Clintons’ oligarch buddy fits into this context.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article182303.html

Manlio Dinucci

Source
Il Manifesto (Italy)

Smart Meter Dangers are Real | Vidya Frazier, Guest Waking Times

Waking Times<<
If you’ve been suffering from health symptoms since you had a smart meter attached to your home and others are telling you it’s just your imagination—take heart: there is clear evidence stating that smart meter dangers are real.

Evidence of Smart Meter Dangers

The conclusions of independent research are that safety standards of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are woefully insufficient for guarding people against smart meter radiation levels—and that some installations of smart meters don’t even comply with those inadequate standards.

To begin with, FCC standards, set back in 1996, were based on studies with models of healthy 6’2”, 220 lbs men exposed for short periods of time to wireless radiation.
This, of course, is not even relevant in today’s world, in which women, children and people in poor health are continuously exposed to the radiation from many different sources.

But perhaps most importantly, the FCC only tested for thermal damage—and the health risks independent researchers are finding today are from non-thermal radiation. Also, other sources of radiation (such as Wi-Fi, cell phones, and other wireless devices, all present in today’s homes) were not present in the testing sessions with radiation.
For all these reasons, the report strongly cautions that smart meters are not safe.

Live Blood Tests done on People Near Smart Meters

American Academy of Environmental Medicine Calls Installation of Smart Meters Irresponsible

Calling for immediate caution regarding smart meter radiation health risks, a letter published by the American Academy of Environmental Medicine cites a number of peer-reviewed, double-blind, placebo-controlled research in humans, and concludes that…

“…significant harmful biological effects occur from non-thermal RF exposure, showing causality.”

It further states that the installation is irresponsible and calls not only for a moratorium on installation, but also immediate relief to those requesting it, including the return of analog meters.

Wireless Radiation Correlated with Diseases

An article in the scientific journal Pathophysiology in 2007 by C. Sage and D. Carpenter outlines in detail the reasons for concern about wireless radiation. They cite studies linking non-thermal radiation to:

Brain tumors
Leukemia
Breast Cancer
Alzheimer’s and ALS
DNA damage
Breakage of blood-brain barrier
Altered immune function

They conclude that:

“The rapidly expanding development of new wireless technologies and the long latency for the development of such serious diseases as brain cancers means that failure to take immediate action to reduce risks may result in an epidemic of potentially fatal diseases in the future.”

Early Smart Meter Health Symptoms

Common symptoms after the installation of a smart meter are:

headaches
concentration & memory problems
dizziness, tinnitus
heart palpitations
sleep disruptions
nausea
depression, anxiety
behavioral problems in children

Certain groups of people are especially vulnerable to smart meter radiation dangers: children (who absorb radiation at a greater rate than adults), people with electromagnetic sensitivity, people wearing pacemakers, and chronically or acutely ill people whose immune systems are compromised.

Protection against Smart Meters Dangers

There are no warnings about health dangers that come with the installation of a smart meter. In some areas, it’s now possible to opt out—usually for a monthly fee. But you may not wish to pay this fee. Or you may be faced with living near a whole bank of smart meters on your building or next door, so opting out won’t do you much good.

What makes sense is to simply get EMF protection. Check out EarthCalm’s solution for protecting yourself against smart meter dangers.

February 24, 2014

About the Author

Vidya Frazier is the editor of EarthCalm.com, where this article was originally featured.
This article is offered under Creative Commons license. It’s okay to republish it anywhere as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact.

BREAKING: Social Security Records Show No Deaths in Alleged Sandy Hook Massacre | Sandy Hook Gun Grab Scandal Breaks Wide Open Under New Investigation | Tuesday, February 25th, 2014 | Harold Saive

Added 2/26/2014: BREAKING: Social Security Records Show No Deaths in Alleged Sandy Hook Massacre. Manual search of the Social Security Death master file lists reveals no deaths and no victims in the alleged Sandy Hook murders *** Continue

____________________

By Harold Saive and Wolfgang Halbig – 2/25/2014

Just this morning, I received a call from the National Rifle Assocition (NRA) asking for my support to protect assaults on the second amendment of the US Constitution.

Aware that my remarks were recorded for “quality control”, I responded that my willingness to donate is based on the NRA’s tangible support of Wolfgang Halbig in his quest to demand justice in the coverup of the alleged Sandy Hook shooting.

I continued:

“With all the evidence available, we need to know why the NRA decided to cave on their duty to actively challenge the government’s story through demanding a prompt investigation of dubious events. It should be no secret to the NRA that the alleged Sandy Hook massacre is being used as a pretext to federal gun-grab legislation. Failure to protect their membership and the American people on this probable contrived event is a betrayal to those members who pay dues and rely on the NRA to protect the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution.”

Corporate media and their army of pseudo-journalists began selling the public on the tragedy of the mass shooting committed by yet, another lone gunman – this time at Sandy Hook elementary school on Dec 14, 2012.

But as time goes by, inconsistencies including numerous instances of foreknowledge continue to create a mountain of doubt. Growing public skepticism combined with earned trust by non-corporate, alternative media is the most likely reason the FBI has now “classified” evidence in the shooting. The act of classifying evidence is designed to provide a fire-wall of secrecy and FOIA denials to effectively “cover-up” incriminating details that could send many officials to jail.

The answer to one important question is now subject to cover-up by virtue of being “classified”:

“ What are the names of the police who pronounced the children dead at the scene before licensed physicians and personnel, authorized to make such decisions, had a chance to examine the victims?”

A New Investigator, Wolfgang Halbig is determined to break the silence on the Sandy Hook Coverup.

His credentials and involvement in school tragedies qualifies him to help lead us to the truth.

Law enforcement: Florida State Trooper, US Customs Agent.
Education: teacher, assistant principal, principal.
Current school safety expert. Trained key personnel at over 4,000 US school districts, and over 3,500 school safety officers.

Halbig’s conclusion after ten months of motivated investigation:

“In my professional opinion, Sandy Hook was a scripted event… in planning for maybe two, two and a half years.”

The case for exposing the critical irregularities around the events of the alleged Sandy Hook shooting massacre are gaining national attention.

Halbig interviewd on Infowars Feb 20th, 2014

vimeo - Veterans Today -

Efforts to silence Halbig were launched by plain clothes sheriff detectives from Lake County, Florida who visited him in December, 2012.

Citing no authority, they threatened him with criminal charges out of Connecticut if he didn’t stop “harassing” public officials with repeated phone calls and FOIA requests.

Halbig is demanding subpeona and/or arrest of leaders involved in Sandy Hook based on questions that reveal serious transgressions of procedure, ethics and law.

His FACEBOOK PAGE is a platform for pubic exchange with more questions raised every day.

Halbig: I must share with you that I pray to God everyday for the sake of my grandchildren that I am wrong about the Sandy Hook School Shooting Massacre on Dec 14, 2012.

But when you have two plain cloth Homicide Detectives show up at my home and threatend me by telling me that the CT State Police will have me arrested if I do not stop asking questions about the Sandy Hook Shooting it changed everything for me and my family.

Once we get the truth about just the first 16 questions I will go away and live out my retirement in peace.

They started it. As they say let the game begin.

Feb 25, 2014 – Good morning everyone and now lets look at two more huge questions that hopefully someone helping to solve this puzzle might have. If you do please let me and all of us know. You must stay focused on the 16 questions not 911 or Boston that is what they the government is counting on. They want this country to be fragmented because if they can keep us divided then they control us.

Sandy Hook Justice Puzzle – 16 simple questions ever changing that MUST require an answer.

Please stay focused on the first 16 questions then we go to the next ten questions and then we go to the videos and police reports.

1. Who directed the New Haven FBI field offices to classify the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting on Dec 14, 2012?

2. Why and for what reason would the FBI classify the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting when they did not classify the Columbine shooting which also was a Mass casualty shooting incident?

3. Who on Dec 14, 2012 was the Incident Commander as required by the Federal Emergency Management Administration in directing the Mass Casualty Shooting Incident at the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

• Who on Dec 14, 2012 at the Incident Command Center made the ordering of Porta Potties a high priority since they were delivered within 3 hours of the school shooting? Never ever heard off.
• Who ordered those Port Potties from Southbury, Ct?
• When I called the Porta Pottie Company after searching for over a week as to who and when they were ordered I was told that it is classified and they are not allowed to share that information with me.
• The next morning I received a phone call from the Southbury Police Department at my home telling me not to call that company again since I was harassing them.
• High priority for toilets but not for Life Star Trauma helicopters or paramedics.

4. Who and Why did they not request the Life Star Helicopters knowing that children and school staff are seriously injured and clinging to life?

5. Who and Why did they not allow the Paramedics and the EMT’S inside the Sandy Hook School to treat the seriously injured or those children and school staff clinging to life?

6. Who declared all 18 children and six school staff members legally dead within the first 8 minutes?

7. Who was the Certified Environmental Bio-Hazard Decontamination company contracted by the Newtown Public Schools to remove 45-65 gallons of blood, skull fragments, brain tissues, bodily fluids, blood soaked carpets and any other decontaminated are a inside the Sandy Hook School?

8. Why does an off duty Lt from the Newtown Police Department refuse to leave his off duty work assignment at a construction site on Dec 14, 2012 when hearing that shots have been fired at the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

9. Who at the Newtown Public Schools notified all of the parents in writing as required by CT law that had children attending the Sandy Hook Elementary School as well as every school staff member every school year of all the potential life threatening chemical hazards. The school had high levels of lead paint throughout the entire school, Asbestos in the ceiling time and floor tile, asbestos in the insulation and most of all the school had very high levels of PCB?

10. Who provided the urgent medical care to the two children who were not transported to the Danbury Trauma Center until an hour after the school was deemed safe for that 15-mile drive?

11. Who treated those two children who had been shot multiple times like three to 11 times since they did not allow the paramedics and EMT’S inside the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

12. Why did the parents of the two children who died at the Danbury hospital not allow their children to donate their organs to other children waiting for the gift of life?

13. What happened to the 500 children and 60 school staff members from Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec 14, 2012?

14. Who was the police officer calling into the Newtown Police dispatcher stating in his words that he has multiple weapons, he has a rifle and a shotgun and who has the rifle and the shotgun as the chain of evidence should show that was found in classroom eight (8)?

15. Why would a police officer by the name of Lt Vangehle at 9:45:21 am on Dec 14, 2012 from the Newtown Police Department after finding a kindergarten female child in the hallway make her go into room eight (8) and leave her? Room eight is a gruesome crime scene with dead children and school staff. Why?

16. Why would two CT State Troopers enter room ten (10) at 9:55:31 am on Dec 14, 2012 which is a gruesome crime scene with dead bodies of children and school staff and tell a kindergarten boy who they find in the bathroom who’s name is redacted and tell them so it must be more than one to stay and they will be both back when it is safe?

Please all focus on those 16 questions then we will move to the next ten questions.

Thanks, Wolfgang