- Above Ch'ien the Creative, Heaven
- Below Li the Clinging, Flame
THE BOOK OF CHANGES and THE UNCHANGING TRUTH, By HUA-CHING NI
Oregonlive.com/portland/2012/12/mike_schrunk_multnomah_county<Click
THE OP-NAT EYE ~OPERATION NATION: Keeping U.S. Government And Media Honest
"... And let's face it...if Schrunk really wanted this
proceeding against current killer cop Ronald Frashour to be public, he
could simply hold a pre-trial hearing to determine if enough evidence
exists for murder or manslaughter charges (which there obviously is, but
the word "cop" means "constitutionally protected").
We'll continue to follow this story, but expect the same thug cop justice in the end, and another American family grieving the loss of brother and son; and another brother and son who passed away earlier in the same day.
by Brian A. Wilkins 2/4/2010
We'll continue to follow this story, but expect the same thug cop justice in the end, and another American family grieving the loss of brother and son; and another brother and son who passed away earlier in the same day.
by Brian A. Wilkins 2/4/2010
Oregon News $1.2 million settlement in police shooting of Aaron Campbell nwcn.com/news/oregon<Click
motherjones/2010/07/when-police-shoot-and-kill-unarmed-men<Click
"... 2010, January 29: Portland police officers get a call to check on a suicidal and armed man at an apartment complex. Aaron Campbell, 25, comes out of the apartment walking backward toward police with his hands over his head. The Oregonian reports that police say Campbell ignored their orders to put his hands up. At which point one officer fired six bean bag shots at his back. Witnesses say they saw Campbell reach his arm around his back, where the beanbag struck him. Officer Ronald Frashour says he saw Campbell reach both hands around his waistband to get a gun, and so he shot Campbell in the back with an assault rifle. "We feel that his death resulted from flawed police policies, incomplete or inappropriate training, incomplete communication and other issues with the police effort,'' a jury wrote after charging the police officer with no criminal wrongdoing.
"... Grand jurors: Something went
'terribly, terribly wrong' in police shooting of Aaron Campbell,
Published: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 12:23 PM Updated: Sunday, February 21, 2010, 6:33 PM ...."
Portland NLG Student Chapter Represents Complainants Before Citizen Review Committee February 20, 2013<Click
Stephen Slevin: $15.5 million awarded in Drunk Driving solitary confinement case ... |
motherjones/2010/07/when-police-shoot-and-kill-unarmed-men<Click
"... 2010, January 29: Portland police officers get a call to check on a suicidal and armed man at an apartment complex. Aaron Campbell, 25, comes out of the apartment walking backward toward police with his hands over his head. The Oregonian reports that police say Campbell ignored their orders to put his hands up. At which point one officer fired six bean bag shots at his back. Witnesses say they saw Campbell reach his arm around his back, where the beanbag struck him. Officer Ronald Frashour says he saw Campbell reach both hands around his waistband to get a gun, and so he shot Campbell in the back with an assault rifle. "We feel that his death resulted from flawed police policies, incomplete or inappropriate training, incomplete communication and other issues with the police effort,'' a jury wrote after charging the police officer with no criminal wrongdoing.
FRANK WATERHOUSE YOUTUBE VIDEO
February 20, 2013
The Portland NLG Student Chapter has a number of volunteers who represent individuals who wish to appeal the City’s findings in police misconduct complaints. Here, law student Dana Gross describes her experience.
Last month, I acted as an advocate for a complainant at a Citizen Review Committee (CRC) appeal from the findings in her police misconduct complaint. The City of Portland Independent Police Review division (IPR), the City body charged with handling police misconduct complaints, issued the findings. After Internal Affairs investigates, the IPR may issue a finding of either “not sustained” or “sustained.” The complainant and the officer each have the right to request an appeal to the CRC, the nine-member panel, composed, as the name suggests, of private citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment