WHAT IS THE BIGGEST BUBBLE IN AMERICA TO "POP GOES THE WEASEL?" PORTFOLIOS OF "INJUSTICE" ?! |
AS YOU 'ALL' KNOW ~ DUE TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISES ONGOING, WE THE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE AUTOMATIC, FULL TRANSPARENT ACCESS TO 'OUR GOVERNMENT' ~~
To Congressman Honorable Elijah E. Cummings ~ "GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE", ET AL ~ 1010 Park Avenue Suite 105, Baltimore, MD 21201, T (410) 685-9199, F (410) 685-9399
To Senator Honorable Elizabeth Warren IE CONSUMER PROTECTION, ET CETERA 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203, T (617) 564-3170, F (216) 522-2239 ~
ELIZABETH WARREN |
Tensions are high,” she notes, and “we should all recognize that tensions are high due to the judiciary’s dire fiscal situation.
As for what can be done to address the branch’s fiscal woes, Cantil-Sakauye says she wanted “to know what people thought” would be the best course of action, since “my whole life, from growing up…has informed me that the best decision is one that is based on facts.” >>CLICK>>http://www.metnews.com/articles/2012/cantil011712.htm
To Honorable Tani Cantil-Sakauye IE CHIEF JUSTICE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL, ET CETERA 455 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102, F (415) 865-4586
To Senator Sherrod Brown, 1301 East Ninth St., Suite 1710 Cleveland, OH 44114, T (216) 522-7272, F (216) 522-2239,
To Senator David Vitter, 858 Convention St. Baton Rouge, LA 70802, T (225) 383-0331, F (225) 383-0952
As shown in the diagram ~~ any time the government wants to propose a rule that impacts individuals, it has to seek consent of the governed. If it wants to prosecute someone for violating one of those rules, it must bring that rule and its proposed action before a jury and a grand jury. There we get to decide if it is a valid law in the first instance, and if a person has violated that rule. Corrupt judges will suggest to a jury that they are not to decide the law, only the facts of the case. That didn’t work out for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase, now did it, where he was impeached (but not convicted) for instructing a jury that they couldn’t decide on the law itself. >>click>>http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/tag/constitution/
This failure to understand our power has had serious consequences. All you need to do is look at the prosecution of individuals under the law that never was–the unconstitutional sixteenth amendment–and the congressionally created Internal Revenu
e Service (IRS) used to ‘enforce’ an unconstitutional law.
As for what can be done to address the branch’s fiscal woes, Cantil-Sakauye says she wanted “to know what people thought” would be the best course of action, since “my whole life, from growing up…has informed me that the best decision is one that is based on facts.” >>CLICK>>http://www.metnews.com/articles/2012/cantil011712.htm
To Honorable Tani Cantil-Sakauye IE CHIEF JUSTICE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL, ET CETERA 455 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102, F (415) 865-4586
BROWN & VITTER KNOW |
To Senator Sherrod Brown, 1301 East Ninth St., Suite 1710 Cleveland, OH 44114, T (216) 522-7272, F (216) 522-2239,
To Senator David Vitter, 858 Convention St. Baton Rouge, LA 70802, T (225) 383-0331, F (225) 383-0952
As shown in the diagram ~~ any time the government wants to propose a rule that impacts individuals, it has to seek consent of the governed. If it wants to prosecute someone for violating one of those rules, it must bring that rule and its proposed action before a jury and a grand jury. There we get to decide if it is a valid law in the first instance, and if a person has violated that rule. Corrupt judges will suggest to a jury that they are not to decide the law, only the facts of the case. That didn’t work out for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase, now did it, where he was impeached (but not convicted) for instructing a jury that they couldn’t decide on the law itself. >>click>>http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/tag/constitution/
This failure to understand our power has had serious consequences. All you need to do is look at the prosecution of individuals under the law that never was–the unconstitutional sixteenth amendment–and the congressionally created Internal Revenu
No comments:
Post a Comment