III. The Middle Ages (600 – 1500 CE). The return to virtual credit money .. If the Axial Age saw the emergence of complementary ideals of commodity markets and universal world religions, the Middle Ages
were the period in which those two institutions began to merge.
Religions began to take over the market systems.
Everything from
international trade to the organisation of local fairs increasingly
came to be carried out through social networks defined and regulated by
religious authorities.
This enabled, in turn, the return throughout
Eurasia of various forms of virtual credit money.
In Europe, where all this took place under the aegis of Christendom,
coinage was only sporadically, and unevenly, available. Prices after
800 AD were calculated largely in terms of an old Carolingian currency
that no longer existed (it was actually referred to at the time as imaginary money, but ordinary day-to-day buying and selling was
carried out mainly through other means ..The Church, meanwhile, provided a legal
framework, enforcing strict controls on the lending of money at interest
and prohibitions on debt bondage .. The real nerve centre of the Medieval world economy, though, was the
Indian Ocean, which along with the Central Asia caravan routes
connected the great civilisations of India, China, and the Middle East.
Here, trade was conducted through the framework of Islam, which not
only provided a legal structure highly conducive to mercantile
activities (while absolutely forbidding the lending of money at
interest), but allowed for peaceful relations between merchants over a
remarkably large part of the globe, allowing the creation of a variety
of sophisticated credit instruments. Actually, Western Europe was, as
in so many things, a relative late-comer in this regard: most of the
financial innovations that reached Italy and France in the 11th and
12th centuries had been in common use in Egypt or Iraq since the 8th or
9th centuries. The word cheque, for example, derives from the Arab sakk, and appeared in English only around 1220 AD.
The case of China is even more complicated: the Middle Ages there
began with the rapid spread of Buddhism, which, while it was in no
position to enact laws or regulate commerce, did quickly move against
local usurers by its invention of the pawn shop – the first pawn shops
being based in Buddhist temples as a way of offering poor farmers an
alternative to the local usurer. Before long, though, the state
reasserted itself, as the state always tends to do in China. But as it
did so, it not only regulated interest rates and attempted to abolish
debt peonage, it moved away from bullion entirely by inventing paper
money. All this was accompanied by the development, again, of a variety
of complex financial instruments.
All this is not to say that this period did not see its share of
carnage and plunder (particularly during the great nomadic invasions) or
that coinage was not, in many times and places, an important medium of
exchange. Still, what really characterises the period appears to be a
movement in the other direction. Most of the Medieval period saw money
largely delinked from coercive institutions. Money changers, one might
say, were invited back into the temples, where they could be monitored.
The result was a flowering of institutions premised on a much higher
degree of social trust.
.. However tawdry their origins, the creation of new media of exchange –
coinage appeared almost simultaneously in Greece, India, and China –
appears to have had profound intellectual effects. Some have even gone
so far as to argue that Greek philosophy was itself made possible by
conceptual innovations introduced by coinage. The most remarkable
pattern, though, is the emergence, in almost the exact times and places
where one also sees the early spread of coinage, of what were to become
modern world religions: prophetic Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism,
Jainism, Confucianism, Taoism, and eventually, Islam. While the precise
links are yet to be fully explored, in certain ways, these religions
appear to have arisen in direct reaction to the logic of the market. To
put the matter somewhat crudely: if one relegates a certain social
space simply to the selfish acquisition of material things, it is
almost inevitable that soon someone else will come to set aside another
domain in which to preach that, from the perspective of ultimate
values, material things are unimportant, and selfishness – or even the
self – illusory.
http://blog.longnow.org/02010/04/22/debt-the-first-five-thousand-years/
No comments:
Post a Comment