Monday, March 11, 2013

"ROBERTS IS WOEFULLY WRONG, I'M CALLING HIM OUT" ~ [Cyclone Cellar Series] SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, USA ~JOHN ROBERTS, CHIEF 2013

JANE SULLIVAN ROBERTS ... Major Lindsey & Africa, 555 12 Th St NW Ste 740, Washington, DC 20004, Office: 202-292-1840, 25 years since Jane Sullivan Roberts was first licensed to practice law, License State, Dist. of Columbia.
irishcentral/Life-with-Chief-Justice-Roberts<Click
 Hexagram 4 - Meng 
MENG, THE UNDEVELOPED ONE
"... In their positions of excessiveness
.. it is difficult for them to achieve true harmony ..

I Ching Hexagram 18 - Ku 
KU, CORRECTING THE CORRUPTION
"... Here corruption has already manifested and can no longer be ignored..
At this time a thorough examination of the situation is of utmost importance before deciding the appropriate action to take.

Justice Roberts.
slate/roberts_chief_justice_upheld_obamacare<Click

 Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin in 2010 holding a copy of the Certificate of Election to certify that Scott Brown was elected senator. (Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff)  "... The problem is, Roberts is woefully wrong on those points, according to Massachusetts Secretary of State William F. Galvin, who on Thursday branded Roberts’s assertion a slur and made a declaration of his own. “I’m calling him out,” Galvin said .... 
boston/massachusetts-official-challenges-chief-justice-roberts-claim-about-voting<Click




How much of this is because of the Voting Rights Act, as opposed to other voter protections that have been adopted since that time, or other societal changes? And even if the Voting Rights Act has been important in facilitating the changes, how many of the gains might be lost if the Section 5 requirements were dropped now?

These are difficult questions that the Supreme Court faces. They are questions of causality – and as any good lawyer knows, establishing a chain of causality is often the most difficult chore in a case.

Statistical analysis can inform the answers if applied thoughtfully. But statistics can obscure the truth when they become divorced from the historical, legal and logical context of a case.
A version of this article appeared in print on 03/08/2013, on page A16 of the NewYork edition with the headline: A Justice’s Use Of Statistics, Viewed Skeptically.

fivethirtyeight.blogsnytimessupreme-court-debate-on-voting-rights-act-a-dubious-use-of-statistics<Click






No comments:

Post a Comment