November 26, 2013
(Tony Cartalucci) - "...any military operation against Iran will likely
be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international
context—both to ensure the logistical support the operation would
require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize
international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or
covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the
Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that
only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for
the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the
United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in
sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community
would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a
very good deal."
-Brookings Institution's 2009 "Which Path to Persia?" report, page 52.
Written years ago, as the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel were already plotting to overrun Iran's neighbor and ally Syria with Al Qaeda to weaken the Islamic Republic before inevitable war, this quote exposes fully the current charade that is the "Iran nuclear deal."
The West has no intention of striking any lasting deal with Iran, as nuclear capabilities, even the acquirement of nuclear weapons by Iran was never truly an existential threat to Western nations or their regional partners. The West's issue with Iran is its sovereignty and its ability to project its interests into spheres traditionally monopolized by the US and UK across the Middle East. Unless Iran plans on turning over its sovereignty and regional influence along with its right to develop and use nuclear technology, betrayal of any "nuclear deal" is all but inevitable, as is the war that is to shortly follow.
Exposing the duplicity that accompanies Western "efforts" to strike a deal will severely undermine their attempt to then use the deal as leverage to justify military operations against Iran. For Iran and its allies, they must be prepared for war, more so when the West feigns interest in peace. Libya serves as a perfect example of the fate that awaits nations reproached by the West who let down their guard - it literally is a matter of life and death both for leaders, and for nations as a whole.
-Brookings Institution's 2009 "Which Path to Persia?" report, page 52.
Written years ago, as the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel were already plotting to overrun Iran's neighbor and ally Syria with Al Qaeda to weaken the Islamic Republic before inevitable war, this quote exposes fully the current charade that is the "Iran nuclear deal."
The West has no intention of striking any lasting deal with Iran, as nuclear capabilities, even the acquirement of nuclear weapons by Iran was never truly an existential threat to Western nations or their regional partners. The West's issue with Iran is its sovereignty and its ability to project its interests into spheres traditionally monopolized by the US and UK across the Middle East. Unless Iran plans on turning over its sovereignty and regional influence along with its right to develop and use nuclear technology, betrayal of any "nuclear deal" is all but inevitable, as is the war that is to shortly follow.
Exposing the duplicity that accompanies Western "efforts" to strike a deal will severely undermine their attempt to then use the deal as leverage to justify military operations against Iran. For Iran and its allies, they must be prepared for war, more so when the West feigns interest in peace. Libya serves as a perfect example of the fate that awaits nations reproached by the West who let down their guard - it literally is a matter of life and death both for leaders, and for nations as a whole.
The ISRAELI LOBBY also known as the WORLD ZIONIST ORGANIZATION, isn't going to become enlightened. No, the spark plug fossil in amber, scorpion glowing radio active in the dark, we can count on Bolton to nuke us back to the stone age, or nuclear winter forever and ever.
ReplyDelete