Tuesday, January 14, 2014

SCOTU$ & MONSANTO GENOCIDE: 'Forgiveness?! Hold Harmless' ~brains shrunken, endocrine systems bent or worse?!





EARTH's supposed safest place, when BRAIN-DEAD Blow U$ again
SEXUAL DISEASE/S in humans, OLD museum marble bust
[sidebar #1:  Let U$ play Holly Wood and see how the reality looks, SCOTUS IE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, and-and-and, SENIOR JUSTICES RETIRING FROM THE BENCH OF THE 'FEDERAL ... 9CIRCUIT?!  What is this place we call Enlightened Due Process Law!! ??

We've serious problems.  In the brain is not a whole organ, upon the testing such as a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) an apartheid is definite in measuring, for example, circumcision.  Now, think about the Metzitzah b'peh for (said to be five -5- thousand years in the practice of this abomination to the male species), and what we have is a serious problem in our thinking stuff -- THE -- BRAIN has been intentionally, in the PINECONE most targeted on an intentional on purpose to-be-absolutely-certain!

OF COURSE SCOTUS, POTUS, FLOTUS, ET AL are controlled robots.  How else to run a big planet such as earth and all those running around free humans!  Capital to control the growing of the certain imaginations that have been contaminated in ITS' own diseased inbred insanities.]

Supreme Court Hands Monsanto Victory Over Farmers on GMO Seed Patents and Ability to Sue .. None of the plaintiffs are customers of Monsanto and none have licensing agreements with the company. The group argued that they do not want Monsanto’s genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) and want legal protection in case of inadvertent contact with the company’s products.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/supreme-court-hands-monsanto-victory-over-farmers-on-gmo-seed-patents-and-ability-to-sue/5364782

[sidebar #2:  In America there is FRAUD and then the FRAUD actually knows no boundaries.  Dresses up like ITS' a chosen something or another, can't be sure WHAT are these 'humans' that allow their brains to be shrunken and endocrine systems poisoned and then call themselves JUSTICE in the world of due process law.  An enlightenment?  For those that have these so called "LAWYERS" doing exactly what an Apartheid-Genocidal Maniacal Brain-Dead Killing Machine would do.  Retire on their own demise and their family/ies?  Who cares about that old fashioned ideology!]

licensing agreements ??

>  Is our legal system that corrupt?
Yep! 
For example, read what the late LAPD Detective Gary Wean wrote about downtown Los Angeles, naming names here

http://supremelaw.org/authors/wean/gary.wean.article.htm

Why do you think the prison population in America is at an all-time high?  Answer:  because these corrupt "robes" are engaged in perpetrating a nationwide prison racket:

http://supremelaw.org/press/rels/kickback.htm
In Las Vegas, brown bags filled with $100 poker chips show up "spontaneously" on the front door steps of Nevada's Federal "Judges" -- for the wives to enjoy!


http://supremelaw.org/press/rels/lawless.htm

     It is  no wonder  that well in excess of 80% of the American People are  now disgusted with government, and all of its agents.
Our Chief  Justice is  clearly a  criminal  if  he  continues  to advocate taxation  of federal judges, in the face of supreme laws
which maintain  the contrary.   Federal  judges  are  also  heavy investors in  the United  States Prison Industries, now the fifth
largest enterprise  of the  whole American  economy.  Need we say any more?   Yes,  we need  to say more, because the incarceration
rate in  the land of the free is now the highest in the world, by wide margins.   You  can thank  William  H.  Rehnquist  for  that
honorable distinction.  None will dare to call it treason.


>  the issue of Judge Robart
Part of the problem is that people like yourself will repeat that same mistake, even after I've shown you PROOF why his credentials are fatally defective.
Old habits die hard!


>  My lawyer will look into the issue
I wouldn't get your hopes up too high:
licensed attorneys generally refuse to inquire into the existence of valid credentials, EVEN THOUGH their Oaths of Office require them to honor and obey Article VI in the U.S. Constitution:

http://supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3
Attorney are "officers of the court" and as such they are required by 4 U.S.C. 101 to execute the same OATH:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/4/101.html

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aol/criminal.complaint.htm

LIST OF AUTHORITIES

Plaintiff cites the following authorities in support of His VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, to wit:  Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”);  Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”);  Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section “II.”);  “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997);  and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”).


In Washington State, see Rule 5 of the Washington State Court Rules, Admission to Practice Rules:

http://www.courts.wa.gov/court_rules/?fa=court_rules.rulesPDF&groupName=ga&setName=APR
scroll down to "OATH OF ATTORNEY":

                                                APR 5
                        RECOMMENDATION FOR ADMISSION; ORDER ADMITTING TO PRACTICE;
                       PAYMENT OF MEMBERSHIP FEE; OATH OF ATTORNEY; RESIDENT AGENT


    (a)  Recommendation for Admission. The Board of Governors shall recommend to the Supreme Court the
admission or rejection of each applicant who has passed the bar examination or been approved for admission by
motion, and, who has complied with the preadmission requirements set forth in this rule. A recommendation for
admission shall be based upon the Board of Governors determination, after investigation, that the applicant appears
to be of good moral character and in all respects qualified to engage in the practice of law. All recommendations of
the Board of Governors shall be accompanied by the applicant's application for admission and any other documents
deemed pertinent by the Board of Governors or requested by the Supreme Court. The recommendation and all
accompanying documents and papers shall be kept by the Clerk of the Supreme Court in a separate file which shall
not be a public record.

    (b)  Preadmission Requirements.  Before an applicant who has passed the bar examination, or who qualifies for
admission without passing the bar examination, may be admitted, the applicant must:

    (1)  take and pass the Washington Law Component;

    (2)  complete a minimum of 4 hours education in a curriculum and under circumstances approved by the
Board of Governors;

    (3)  pay to the Bar Association the annual license fee and any assessments for the current year;

    (4)  file any and all licensing forms required of active members;

    (5)  take the Oath of Attorney; and

    (6)  designate a resident agent if required to do so by section (f).

For applicants who take and pass the bar examination, the preadmission requirements must be completed within 40
months from the date of the administration of the bar examination in which the score was earned.  For applicants
who apply by motion, the preadmission requirements must be completed within one year from the date of filing the
application, except for good cause shown.

    (c)  Oath of Attorney. The Oath of Attorney must be taken before an elected or appointed judge, excluding
judges pro tempore, sitting in open court in the state of Washington. In the event a successful applicant is outside the
state of Washington and the Chief Justice is satisfied that it is impossible or impractical for the applicant to take the
oath before an elected or appointed judge in this state, the Chief Justice may, upon proper application setting forth
all the circumstances, designate a person authorized by law to administer oaths, before whom the applicant may
appear and take said oath.

    (d)  Contents of Oath. The oath which all applicants shall take is as follows:


                                                OATH OF ATTORNEY

    State of Washington, County of _______________ ss.

    I, _______________, do solemnly declare:

    1.  I am fully subject to the laws of the State of Washington and the laws of the United States and will
        abide by the same.

    2.  I will support the Constitution of the State of Washington and the Constitution of the United States.

    3.  I will abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct approved by the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.

    4.  I will maintain the respect due to the courts of justice and judicial officers.

    5.  I will not counsel or maintain any suit or proceeding which shall appear to me to be unjust, or any
        defense except as I believe to be honestly debatable under the law, unless it is in defense of a person
        charged with a public offense. I will employ, for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me,
        only those means consistent with truth and honor. I will never seek to mislead the judge or jury by any
        artifice or false statement.

    6.  I will maintain the confidence and preserve inviolate the secrets of my client, and will accept no
        compensation in connection with the business of my client unless this compensation is from or with the
        knowledge and approval of the client or with the approval of the court.

    7.  I will abstain from all offensive personalities and advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation
        of a party or witness unless required by the justice of the cause with which I am charged.

    8.  I will never reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed,
        or delay unjustly the cause of any person.


    ______________________________________
               (Signature)


    SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this _____ day of __________, 20__.


    ______________________________________
                Judge


    (e)  Order Admitting to Practice. After examining the recommendation and accompanying papers transmitted
by the Board of Governors, the Supreme Court may enter such order in each case as it deems advisable. For those
applicants it deems qualified, the Supreme Court shall enter an order admitting them to the practice of law.
 
    (f)  Nonresident Lawyers; Resident Agent. There shall be no requirement that an applicant or a member of the
Bar Association be a resident in the state of Washington. Every member, except a judicial member, of the Bar
Association who does not live or maintain an office in the state of Washington shall file with the Bar Association the
name and address of an agent within this state for the purpose of receiving service of process or of any other
document required or permitted by statute or court rule to be served or delivered to a resident lawyer. Service or
delivery to such agent shall be deemed service upon or delivery to the lawyer.


[Amended effective July 9, 1965; March 10, 1971; April 26, 1974; May 14, 1982; September 1, 1984;
October 11, 1985; June 25, 2002; June 1, 2006; January 8, 2013; January 1, 2014.] 

1 comment:

  1. When our supposed HIGHEST COURT is brain dead and endocrine poisoned, then we can expect to keep on in the APARTHEID-Genocide and call this CIVILIZATION Wall Street Style.

    ReplyDelete