DEFLATION: United States of America's Court System | INTERNATIONAL | On-Line Changes Global MARKET "Due Process Rule of LAW"

Image Info  / Full Size

• Photo Templates from Stopdesign. Powered by ZenPhoto.  

One glance at the U.S. economy will thus tell you that a burst of deflation is sorely needed. Infrastructure costs about five times as much as it should. Since the middle 1960s, with one short interlude in the 1980s, money has been cheap and inflation has been pervasive. This has resulted in regulation and delays being piled onto large infrastructure projects, with the cost increases being assumed as natural and critics blasted for not caring about the poor state of U.S. infrastructure. The reality is that we could not replicate the Interstate Highway System, the 1960s space program or the nuclear reactor grid without driving the country into bankruptcy. Deflation would force the U.S. to hack away at this morass, until a simple tunnel under the Hudson River could once again be had for $1 billion instead of $9 billion and a high-speed rail link between San Francisco and Los Angeles could be had for $10 billion instead of $80 billion—and both completed far more quickly than is currently thought possible.

http://www.prudentbear.com/2014/04/the-bears-lair-promise-of-deflation.html#.U03zFih8vzI

STATEMENTS FOR THE RECORD, In addition to my statement and Judge Bates’, I ask that the entire statements of the Federal Judicial Center, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Court of International Trade be included in the hearing record.   ROLE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH, Chairman Crenshaw and Representative Serrano, each year in my appearance before this Committee I ask that as you consider funding levels for the upcoming fiscal year that you take into account the nature and importance of the work of the federal courts, and I do so again this year because it is a point that bears repeating.  The Judiciary performs Constitutionally-mandated core government functions that are a pillar of our democratic system of government. The scope and volume of our work is attributable to carrying out functions assigned to us by the Constitution and by statute. We must adjudicate all cases that are filed with the courts, we must protect the community by supervising defendants awaiting trial and offenders on post-conviction release, we must provide qualified defense counsel for defendants who cannot afford representation, we must pay jurors for costs associated with performing their civic duty, and we must ensure the safety and security of judges, court staff, litigants, and the public in federal court facilities. This is a broad mission and one that all of us in the Judiciary take very seriously.  As I will describe in my testimony, sequestration had a devastating impact on federal court operations in fiscal year 2013, and the funding Congress provided in fiscal year 2014 will stabilize our financial position. I am very concerned, however, about the longer-term funding prospects for the Judiciary in what will be a constrained federal budget environment for the foreseeable future. As you know, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 – the budget agreement that modifies the Budget Control Act to set government-wide discretionary spending caps for fiscal year 2014 and fiscal year 2015 – provides essentially no growth from fiscal year 2014 to 2015, increasing only $2 billion with the increase split equally between defense and non-defense spending. Beyond fiscal year 2015, in the absence of additional deficit reduction, the spending caps will rise by an inflationary rate of about 2.4 percent annually through fiscal year 2021. Flat funding in fiscal year 2015 and nominal increases in the out-years  ...

http://news.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Judge-Gibbons_2015-Budget.pdf

[sidebar:  JUDICIARY costs the amount of so called MONEY to operate "Jurisprudence", and of course the operation is for the good of the people.  The 'Robed' FACTION isn't exactly doing the job because of the love of the due process rule of law.

BANKS?  Owners of the so called "courts" and where did the doom begin?

BOOM-BOOM, we all know the Roman Empire isn't going to stop the quest.

HOLY GRAIL:  wound of the soul "I'm not worthy" keep more and more and more overflowing more, always about 'more' .... !?

The court system must be deflated into not a RICO global.  Running a racket for the VATICAN?  British Accredited Registry (B.A.R.) is a foreign entity that has such as, but not limited to:  BANK OF AMERICA, MERRILL LYNCH, WELLS FARGO, ET AL, and the racket is a digital power that's completely out of control.

IMAGINE all the "Lawyers' Trust Accounts", the INTEREST ON, that is:  IOLTA.  This can actually function as what was intended, and then there are so many CHANGES and the question begs ... are Americans intelligent enough in the so called profession of,

... the Constitutionally-mandated core government functions that are a pillar of our democratic system of government  .... ? ...

How come the BANKS got to get bailed out but, the Courts are only able to beg over and over for mercy in TRANSFERRING WEALTH to the RICO that now is siphoning the COURTS' and we must wonder, really-really wonder here .. to be continued ...]