Black Hawk Dawn, Zero Dark Thirty and Argo, those are only a few
major recent productions showing how today’s movie industry promotes US
foreign policy. But the motion picture has been used for propaganda
since the beginning of the 20th century and Hollywood’s cooperation with
the Department of Defense, the CIA and other government agencies is no
modern trend.
With Michelle Obama awarding Ben Affleck’s Argo the Oscar for best movie, the industry showed how close it is to Washington. According to Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich, Argo is a propaganda film concealing the ugly truth about the Iranian hostage crisis and designed to prepare the American public for an upcoming confrontation with Iran:
For a real account of the Iranian hostage crisis, a CIA covert
operation, Global Research recommends reading Harry V. Martin’s article
published in 1995: The Real Iranian Hostage Story from the Files of Fara Mansoor:
Earlier this year the Golden Globe awards made some analysts
criticize Hollywood’s dark “celebration of the police state” and argue
that the real Golden Globe winner was the military-industrial complex:
All these troublesome Hollywood connections have been examined in an in-depth report Global Research published in January 2009: Lights, Camera… Covert Action: The Deep Politics of Hollywood.
The article lists a great number of movies in part scripted for
propaganda purposes by the Defense Department, the CIA and other
government agencies. It is interesting to note that this year’s
Oscar-winning director Ben Affleck cooperated with the CIA in 2002 as he
starred in The Sum of All Fears.
Authors Matthew Alford and Robbie Graham explain that compared to the CIA, the Department of Defense “has an ‘open’ but barely publicized relationship with Tinsel Town” which, “whilst morally dubious and barely advertised, has at least occurred within the public domain.” Alford and Graham cite a 1991 CIA report revealing the sprawling influence of the agency, not only in the movie business but also in the media where it “has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation.” It was not until 1996 that the CIA announced it “would now openly collaborate on Hollywood productions, supposedly in a strictly ‘advisory’ capacity”:
During the Cold War the CIA’s Psychological Strategy Board (PSB)
agent Luigi G. Luraschi was a Paramount executive. He “had secured the
agreement of several casting directors to subtly plant ‘well dressed
negroes’ into films, including ‘a dignified negro butler’ who has lines
‘indicating he is a free man’”. The purpose of these changes was “to
hamper the Soviets’ ability to exploit its enemy’s poor record in race
relations and served to create a peculiarly anodyne impression of
America, which was, at that time, still mired in an era of racial
segregation.” (Ibid.)
The latest award-winning movie productions show that the Manichean view of the world put forward by the US foreign policy agenda has not changed since the Cold War. The Hollywood-CIA alliance is alive and well and still portrays America as the “leader of the free world” fighting “evil” around the world:
.
Global Research offers its readers a list of articles on this topic.
Contrary to the Hollywood film industry, Global Research is not subject to any influence from the US intelligence apparatus and works to provide you the truth rather than fiction and propaganda.
We rely solely on the support of our readers to continue the fight for truth and justice. If you want to contribute to independent research become a Global Research member or make a Donation! Your support is very much appreciated.
SELECTED ARTICLES
Patrick Henningsen, Hollywood History: CIA Sponsored “Zero Dark Thirty”, Oscar for “Best Propaganda Picture”)
Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich Oscar to Hollywood’s “Argo”: And the Winners are … the Pentagon and the Israel Lobby
Harry V. Martin, The Real Iranian Hostage Story from the Files of Fara Mansoor
Rob Kall cited inWashington’s Blog, The CIA and Other Government Agencies Dominate Movies and Television
Marjorie Cohn, “Zero Dark Thirty”: Torturing the Facts
Matthew Alford and Robbie Graham, Lights, Camera… Covert Action: The Deep Politics of Hollywood
With Michelle Obama awarding Ben Affleck’s Argo the Oscar for best movie, the industry showed how close it is to Washington. According to Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich, Argo is a propaganda film concealing the ugly truth about the Iranian hostage crisis and designed to prepare the American public for an upcoming confrontation with Iran:
“One of the most pervasive trends in
21st century western culture has become somewhat of an obsession in
America. It’s called “Hollywood history”, where the corporate studio
machines in Los Angeles spend hundreds of millions of dollars in order
to craft and precisely tailor historical events to suit the prevailing
political paradigm.” (Patrick Henningsen, Hollywood History: CIA Sponsored “Zero Dark Thirty”, Oscar for “Best Propaganda Picture”)
Foreign policy observers have long known
that Hollywood reflects and promotes U.S. policies (in turn, is
determined by Israel and its supporters). This fact was made public
when Michelle Obama announced an Oscar win for “Argo” – a highly
propagandist, anti-Iran film. Amidst the glitter and excitement,
Hollywood and White House reveal their pact and send out their message
in time for the upcoming talks surrounding Iran’s nuclear program [...]
Hollywood has a long history of promoting US policies. In 1917, when the United States entered World War I, President Woodrow Wilson’s Committee on Public Information (CPI) enlisted the aid of America ’s film industry to make training films and features supporting the ‘cause’. George Creel, Chairman of the CPI believed that the movies had a role in “carrying the gospel of Americanism to every corner of the globe.”
Hollywood has a long history of promoting US policies. In 1917, when the United States entered World War I, President Woodrow Wilson’s Committee on Public Information (CPI) enlisted the aid of America ’s film industry to make training films and features supporting the ‘cause’. George Creel, Chairman of the CPI believed that the movies had a role in “carrying the gospel of Americanism to every corner of the globe.”
The pact grew stronger during World War
II […] Hollywood ’s contribution was to provide propaganda. After the
war, Washington reciprocated by using subsidies, special provisions in
the Marshall Plan, and general clout to pry open resistant European film
markets […]
As Hollywood and the White House eagerly
embrace “Argo” and its propagandist message, they shamelessly and
deliberately conceal a crucial aspect of this “historical” event. The
glitter buries the all too important fact that the Iranian students who
took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran , proceeded to reveal Israel ’s
dark secret to the world. Documents classified as “SECRET” revealed
LAKAM’s activities. Initiated in 1960, LAKAM was an Israeli network
assigned to economic espionage in the U.S. assigned to “the collection
of scientific intelligence in the U.S. for Israel ’s defense industry”
(Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich Oscar to Hollywood’s “Argo”: And the Winners are … the Pentagon and the Israel Lobby)
Fara Mansoor is a fugitive. No, he hasn’t
broken any laws in the United States. His crime is the truth. What he
has to say and the documents he carries are equivalent to a death
warrant for him, Mansoor is an Iranian who was part of the
“establishment” in Iran long before the 1979 hostage taking. Mansoor’s
records actually discount the alleged “October Surprise” theory that the
Ronald Reagan-George Bush team paid the Iranians not to release 52
American hostages until after the November 1980 Presidential elections
[...]
With thousands of documents to support
his position, Mansoor says that the “hostage crisis” was a political
“management tool” created by the pro-Bush faction of the CIA, and
implemented through an a priori Alliance with Khomeini’s Islamic
Fundamentalists.” He says the purpose was twofold:
- To keep Iran intact and communist-free by putting Khomeini in full control.
- To destablize the Carter Administration and put George Bush in the White House. (Harry V. Martin, The Real Iran Hostage Crisis: A CIA Covert Op)
Zero Dark Thirty is disturbing for two
reasons. First and foremost, it leaves the viewer with the erroneous
impression that torture helped the CIA find bin Laden’s hiding place in
Pakistan. Secondarily, it ignores both the illegality and immorality of
using torture as an interrogation tool.
The thriller opens with the words “based
on first-hand accounts of actual events.” After showing footage of the
horrific 9/11 attacks, it moves into a graphic and lengthy depiction of
torture. The detainee “Ammar” is subjected to waterboarding, stress
positions, sleep deprivation, and confined in a small box. Responding to
the torture, he divulges the name of the courier who ultimately leads
the CIA to bin Laden’s location and assassination. It may be good
theater, but it is inaccurate and misleading.
(Marjorie Cohn, “Zero Dark Thirty”: Torturing the Facts)
Homeland won best TV series, best TV
actor and actress. It IS a highly entertaining show which actually
portrays some of the flaws of the MIIC system.
Argo won best movie and best director. It glorifies the CIA and Ben Affleck spoke with the highest praise for the CIA.
And best actress went to Jessica Chastain
of Zero Dark Thirty, a movie that has been vilified for propagandizing
the use of torture.
***
The Military Industrial Intelligence
Complex is playing a more and more pervasive role in our lives. In the
next few years we’ll be seeing movies that focus on the use of drone
technology in police and spy work in the USA. We’ve already been seeing
movies that show how spies can violate every aspect of our privacy– of
the most intimate parts of our lives. By making movies and TV series
that celebrate these cancerous extensions of the police state Hollywood
and the big studios are normalizing the ideas they present us with–
lying to the public, routinely creating fraudulent stories as covers for
what’s really going on. (Rob Kall cited in Washington’s Blog, The CIA and Other Government Agencies Dominate Movies and Television)
Authors Matthew Alford and Robbie Graham explain that compared to the CIA, the Department of Defense “has an ‘open’ but barely publicized relationship with Tinsel Town” which, “whilst morally dubious and barely advertised, has at least occurred within the public domain.” Alford and Graham cite a 1991 CIA report revealing the sprawling influence of the agency, not only in the movie business but also in the media where it “has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation.” It was not until 1996 that the CIA announced it “would now openly collaborate on Hollywood productions, supposedly in a strictly ‘advisory’ capacity”:
The Agency’s decision to work publicly
with Hollywood was preceded by the 1991 “Task Force Report on Greater
CIA Openness,” compiled by CIA Director Robert Gates’ newly appointed
‘Openness Task Force,’ which secretly debated –ironically– whether the
Agency should be less secretive. The report acknowledges that the CIA
“now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service,
newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,” and the
authors of the report note that this helped them “turn some
‘intelligence failure’ stories into ‘intelligence success’ stories, and
has contributed to the accuracy of countless others.” It goes on to
reveal that the CIA has in the past “persuaded reporters to postpone,
change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected
national security interests” [...]
Espionage novelist Tom Clancy has enjoyed
an especially close relationship with the CIA. In 1984, Clancy was
invited to Langley after writing The Hunt for Red October, which was later turned into the 1990 film. The Agency invited him again when he was working on Patriot Games(1992), and the movie adaptation was, in turn, granted access to Langley facilities. More recently,The Sum of All Fears (2002)
depicted the CIA as tracking down terrorists who detonate a nuclear
weapon on US soil.
For this production, CIA director George Tenet gave
the filmmakers a personal tour of the Langley HQ; the film’s star, Ben
Affleck also consulted with Agency analysts, and Chase Brandon served as
on-set advisor.
The real reasons for the CIA adopting an
“advisory” role on all of these productions are thrown into sharp relief
by a solitary comment from former Associate General Counsel to the CIA,
Paul Kelbaugh. In 2007, whilst at a College in Virginia, Kelbaugh
delivered a lecture on the CIA’s relationship with Hollywood, at which a
local journalist was present. The journalist (who now wishes to remain
anonymous) wrote a review of the lecture which related Kelbaugh’s
discussion of the 2003 thriller The Recruit, starring Al
Pacino. The review noted that, according to Kelbaugh, a CIA agent was on
set for the duration of the shoot under the guise of a consultant, but
that his real job was to misdirect the filmmakers, the journalist quoted
Kelbaugh as saying [...] Kelbaugh emphatically denied having made the
public statement. (Matthew Alford and Robbie Graham, Lights, Camera… Covert Action: The Deep Politics of Hollywood)
The latest award-winning movie productions show that the Manichean view of the world put forward by the US foreign policy agenda has not changed since the Cold War. The Hollywood-CIA alliance is alive and well and still portrays America as the “leader of the free world” fighting “evil” around the world:
The interlocking of Hollywood and
national security apparatuses remains as tight as ever: ex-CIA agent Bob
Baer told us, “There’s a symbiosis between the CIA and Hollywood” […]
Baer’s claims are given weight by the Sun Valley meetings, annual
get-togethers in Idaho’s Sun Valley in which several hundred of the
biggest names in American media –including every major Hollywood studio
executive– convene to discuss collective media strategy for the coming
year. (Ibid.)
.
Global Research offers its readers a list of articles on this topic.
Contrary to the Hollywood film industry, Global Research is not subject to any influence from the US intelligence apparatus and works to provide you the truth rather than fiction and propaganda.
We rely solely on the support of our readers to continue the fight for truth and justice. If you want to contribute to independent research become a Global Research member or make a Donation! Your support is very much appreciated.
SELECTED ARTICLES
Patrick Henningsen, Hollywood History: CIA Sponsored “Zero Dark Thirty”, Oscar for “Best Propaganda Picture”)
Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich Oscar to Hollywood’s “Argo”: And the Winners are … the Pentagon and the Israel Lobby
Harry V. Martin, The Real Iranian Hostage Story from the Files of Fara Mansoor
Rob Kall cited inWashington’s Blog, The CIA and Other Government Agencies Dominate Movies and Television
Marjorie Cohn, “Zero Dark Thirty”: Torturing the Facts
Matthew Alford and Robbie Graham, Lights, Camera… Covert Action: The Deep Politics of Hollywood
Banksters always bank on the most vile evil that can be wrought via the imagination and that is because the Banksters are long gone in the brain and the mind left too, blubbering piles of protoplasm are in control and the BAD MOVIES prove this to be too true in the aughts as well
ReplyDelete