Robert J. Bryan | United States District Court | Western District of Washington

Seattle Intellectual Property American Inn of Court - Home of the ...

http://seattleipinn.org/ 

seattleipinn.org472 × 530Search by image

Justice Lemons and Judge Robert J. Bryan

WSBA Number:	2134
Admit Date:	03/05/1959
Member Status:	Judicial
Public/Mailing Address:	US District Court 1717 Pacific Ave Rm 4427 Tacoma, WA  98402-3224 United States
Phone:	(253) 882-3870
Fax:	(253) 882-3871

Seattle IP Inn of Court Board of Directors (2013-14)

http://seattleipinn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/IP-Inn-Board-Members-and-Emails-2013-14.pdf 

Isabella Fu (Isabella.Fu@microsoft.com); President Brian Park (BCPARK@stoel.com); Vice President and President-Elect

Larry Graham (graham@lowegrahamjones.com); Immediate Past President Mark Walters (MWalters@flhlaw.com); Secretary Davina Inslee (DavinaI@vulcan.com); Treasurer Jonathan McFarland (JMcFarland@perkinscoie.com); Membership Chair

Alina Morris (alina.morris@cojk.com); Program Chair Michael Atkins (mike@atkinsip.com); Website Brooke Taylor (btaylor@susmangodfrey.com); Duncan Macfarlane ( Duncan@Macfarlane-Law.com ); Ben Byer ( benbyer@dwt.com ); Linn Alliance and Achieving Excellence Liaison John Vandenberg ( john.vandenberg@klarquist.com ); Jerry Riedinger ( JRiedinger@perkinscoie.com ); Ex Officio Paul Leuzzi (paul.leuzzi@weyerhaeuser.com) Ex Officio

IPRs and CBMs: The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown – April 17, 2014 – Group 6 April 27, 2014 It was a rainy spring evening when Group 6 presented on inter partes review (IPRs), covered business method patents (CBMs), and what the crystal ball says about each. Their thorough slide deck is a great resource. It’s accessible here<. 

 

>Western District of Washington<

Honorable Marsha J. Pechman, Chief District Judge
William M. McCool, District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

Judge Robert J. Bryan Chambers

Hon. Robert J. Bryan

• Biography
• Chambers Procedures
• Contact Information

View all judges

The Honorable Robert J. Bryan
United States Courthouse
1717 Pacific Avenue, Room 3100
Tacoma, WA 98402-3200
Chambers: (253) 882-3870
Judicial Assistant: (253) 882-3872
Courtroom Deputy: (253) 882-3824
Case Administrator: (253) 882-3802
Proposed Orders: bryanorders@wawd.uscourts.gov

http://governmentoflaw.info/

Email:  bryanorders@wawd.uscourts.gov

This is what happens when the JURISPRUDENCE IS UNEDUCATED, UNDER-EDUCATED AND SIMPLY NOT EDUCATED in the Twenty and Twenty-first Centuries.

Mr. Bryan is operating on the past, and the NINTH CIRCUIT is JURISDICTION which Mr. Bryan is no more the dictator of than he is above the U.S. Constitution.

http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/06/us-supreme-court-rules-government.html 

Monday, June 16, 2014

US Supreme Court Rules Government Officers Liable | NEWS from HUDES' | Time to TUNE INTO The Real Hudes'

https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Entitlement.jpg

http://private-person.com/blog/2014/05/us-supreme-court-rules-government-officers-liable/

http://galeria.blogs.com/godsmadmen/

US Supreme Court Rules Government Officers Liable

May 12, 2014 Case Law, Court Process, In the News, Trainingcourt process, court ruling, Defending Your Rights, In the News, know your rights

One of the legal fantasies promoted by governments and officials is the idea of ‘sovereign immunity’… where they are not liable for their corrupt and illegal actions.
Unfortunately this lie of ‘sovereign immunity’ is also repeated unknowingly by people who have a real case against government officials and therefore do not pursue very valid claims.

A recent US Supreme Court decision clarified and confirmed that the government and their agents can be held liable and accountable for wrongdoing carried out by officials in its employment while on the job.

This should be a a no brainer but in the land of legal fictions and unaccountable government officials being protected by legal process…someone FINALLY took the issue to the US Supreme Court for a common sense confirmation which lower level courts are now bound by.

This is a fundamental principle of law that nobody is above the law including all government actors. The government immunity clause only applies to government actors when they are performing their actions of their office defined by their office in good faith.

Any actions that they take not defined by their office or illegal by their nature are considered have been done outside of their office therefore done in their private capacity and therefore they are fully liable in their private capacity without any protections of their office.

So in effect the government is also liable for having employed them, their supervisors are liable for improper training and oversight and the actions carried out while they were employee and the individual is liable personally also.

In this particular case the complaint and Millbrook had been denied hearings for his claims that the lower courts and submitted a hand written, in pencil, complaint to the Supreme Court of the United States. Less than 1% of Supreme Court applications are heard by the court. I’m certain that this particular case was heard because it addresses a fundamental aspect of law and the only point of protection for a private person from the abuses of any government actor.

If you take the time to read the articles about the case you’ll find the disgusting actions of government lawyers and lower courts protecting the corrupt and abusive actions of government actors creating a series of faulty case law decisions that perpetuate the idea that violence and criminal actions by government actors is protected.

Millbrook filed a handwritten petition, in pencil no less, to the U.S. Supreme Court, and in a rare show of magnanimity, the Court agreed to hear his case and assigned a lawyer to represent him. Curiously enough, after the Court announced it could hear the case, the U.S. Justice Department—which had defended the government’s actions at every level of the judicial proceedings, including asking the Supreme Court not to take the case—did an about-face and switched its position to argue that the FTCA does apply to prison guards as law-enforcement officials.

Sadly much “case law” is biased garbage designed to allow corruption to continue as most people do not have the time, stamina or money to challenge bad decisions to higher and higher courts where the real law might be heard and decided.

This case ultimately should be a watershed decision to open the doors for all manner of complaints against abusive and corrupt actions by government actors, the legal profession and officials as it now clearly confirmed by the Supreme Court that they do not have protection for their illegal and unlawful actions.

MILLBROOK v. UNITED STATES ( )
477 Fed. Appx. 4, reversed and remanded.

• MillsvUSA-Articles - PDFs of below articles .zip 2.2 meg

• https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/millbrook_v_us_holding_the_government_accountable_for_misconduct_by_la
• http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-10362
• http://seattletimes.com/html/politics/2019258111_apussupremecourtneedalawyer.html
• http://theweek.com/article/index/241977/how-one-prisoners-handwritten-petition-won-him-a-supreme-court-case

MR. BRYAN ET AL continued:

US Supreme Court Rules Government Officers Liable

You must become 21 Century internet professionals to keep in the reality of the LAW.

Mr. Bryan, As you were writing this new stuff, the NINTH CIRCUIT, which is what the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IS IN, that is (IE), EVERY USDC IN OREGON, WASHINGTON, CALIFORNIA, ET AL, that are IN the "Ninth Circuit", as you know.  As you once again, proceeded to apply to paper words, THAT aren't JUSTICE in reality,

see here,

http://governmentoflaw.info/  TOO:

ANN L. AIKEN DID NOT, NOT EVER, HAVE AN ORDER THAT WAS HEARD IN THE COURT, TO BE WHAT WAS DONE AND THE NINTH CIRCUIT RECENT MAILING TO ME, CONFIRMS THIS-THESE MOST CRIMINAL ACT/S.

THIS IS A CEASE-DESIST-STOP ORDER IN EVERY "FUTILE" ATTEMPT TO FURTHER CONTAMINATE THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION DUE PROCESS LAW.

YOU HAVE PROCEEDED TIME AND AGAIN, IN PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE?  THAT IS GOING TO BE HEARD IN SMALL CLAIMS, SOON.  Furthermore, there is to be NO FURTHER PROCEDURAL FRAUD IN THE SUPPORT OF AN ORDER VIA ANN L. AIKEN, THAT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED VIA THE NINTH CIRCUIT TO BE:  CRIMINAL FRAUD, IT APPEARS TO BE SO WHEN THERE IS NO "COURT FILING" THAT SUPPORTS WHAT THE USDC IN OREGON AND YOU TOO, WASHINGTON USDC, STIPULATE AS "LAW" TO ACT IN BAD FAITH TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

Hard copies to follow and B.A.R. COMPLAINT, as well, the SMALL CLAIMS can't be tampered with in the filing to sue the CLIENT SECURITY 'AGENT' FOR THE B.A.R.

Roberta Kelly, 503-849-4634

http://www.ethicaljudicialcampaignswa.org/pdf/WACEJC_2012_Statement_of_Purpose.pdf

COPY TO THE FOLLOWING TOO:  Congressman Darrell Issa, Et Al; Hal Rogers, Chair JUDICIAL RULES, PRACTICES, Etc.; E.Volokh, for Alex Kozinski too; Richard A. Posner UChicago; Owen M. Panner; Ronald Sullivan; Martin Gilens; Benjamin I. Page; David Bois; Meredith R. Dearborn; Lawrence Velvel; Et Al

Mr. Robert J. Bryan, my father was also named Robert J.  I actually thought for a while the name meant something.  But, my father was the man who went to war, too, without really understanding what was going on.  HE WAS ALSO PRE-INTERNET.

As you were writing, again, Mr. Bryan, about ANN AIKEN AND FRIVOLOUS AND THE WORDS THAT GET WRITTEN absent the INTERNET being studied by you personally to understand just exactly what's going on.

THE NINTH CIRCUIT IS YOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Mr. Bryan, all Courts in the USDC are NINTH CIRCUIT, that you and I rely upon as LAW.  The LAW has spoken and you're DEAD WRONG, again.

There indeed, Mr. Bryan, is to be A FILING OF A PETITION AGAINST YOU, and the lawlessness you've written once again, and that's not U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL.  (1)  HEARING has to be DECIDED, you must have not been watching the INTERNET, and that was a warning to the United States beginning in the 1970s:  TECHNOLOGY "IT" isn't being taught to the LAW and therefore, there was and is a serious problem.

Should you have BEEN PROFICIENT ON THE 'IT' as in the internet and not the digital fraud called "debt-credit", then you would have known that the NINTH CIRCUIT is where the EXTRAORDINARY WRIT/s are filed and you Mr. Bryan, didn't realize that the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES in March, 2014, SAID LAW HAD ALREADY DECIDE what you have again put into writing that isn't what is REAL LAW.

A WRIT is to be filed and your BUSH POLITICAL as well as the AIKEN CLINTON POLITICAL DECIDERS to make up paper law and circumvent the U.S. Constitution, is to be addressed.

You are not getting away anymore with violating the LAW of the U.S. Constitution.  FRIVOLOUS via Ann Aiken was simply a piece of paper she decided and you've relied upon.  Shameful.

Russia and China were also behind in the IT, but that has definitely changed in the world earth, too.

In closing, PRACTICING 'LAW' absent A LICENSE:  A CRIME?  Should be.  CLIENT SECURITY FUND at the B.A.R. can indeed be sued for this / these crimes against the PUBLIC -- not providing the license necessary for the PUBLIC TO BE PROTECTED FROM SECRET CRIMINAL FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT AND TRANSFERENCE OF WEALTH.

There was an attorney from California involved in the CRIMINAL FRAUD, that is, he was sending in his WRIT to stop Ann L. Aiken, Et Al from committing what was indeed complete CRIMINAL FRAUD.  You have not been thinking through the entirety because you were never provided the whole file.  They, them, those that do what this is, CRIMINAL FRAUD, do-not NOT use-ABUSE the power that is most easily manipulated to get what has been done.

All any intelligent human has to do is look at America and SEE IT isn't other than what your words of UNEDUCATED-UNDEREDUCATED NOT EDUCATED 'put into print', in the real agenda/s.

DO DUE PROCESS LAW is not O.K. in the NINTH CIRCUIT, and you're in need to check in, Mr. Bryan, Et Al.

To Be Continued Aiken, Bryan, Et Al.

Roberta Kelly, Et Al

---

From: "roberta" <roberta@mortgagegaleria.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 12:44 AM
To: bryanorders@wawd.uscourts.gov, "roberta@mortgagegaleria.com" <roberta@mortgagegaleria.com>
Cc: "Brent Hasty" <mpgtrikes@gmail.com>
Subject: "FUTILE" ET AL, ET CETERA

Mr. Bryan, As you were writing this new stuff, the NINTH CIRCUIT, which is what the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IS IN, that is (IE), EVERY USDC IN OREGON, WASHINGTON, CALIFORNIA, ET AL, that are IN the "Ninth Circuit", as you know.  As you once again, proceeded to apply to paper words, THAT aren't JUSTICE in reality,

see here,

http://governmentoflaw.info/  TOO:

ANN L. AIKEN DID NOT, NOT EVER, HAVE AN ORDER THAT WAS HEARD IN THE COURT, TO BE WHAT WAS DONE AND THE NINTH CIRCUIT RECENT MAILING TO ME, CONFIRMS THIS-THESE MOST CRIMINAL ACT/S.

THIS IS A CEASE-DESIST-STOP ORDER IN EVERY "FUTILE" ATTEMPT TO FURTHER CONTAMINATE THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION DUE PROCESS LAW.

YOU HAVE PROCEEDED TIME AND AGAIN, IN PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE?  THAT IS GOING TO BE HEARD IN SMALL CLAIMS, SOON.  Furthermore, there is to be NO FURTHER PROCEDURAL FRAUD IN THE SUPPORT OF AN ORDER VIA ANN L. AIKEN, THAT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED VIA THE NINTH CIRCUIT TO BE:  CRIMINAL FRAUD, IT APPEARS TO BE SO WHEN THERE IS NO "COURT FILING" THAT SUPPORTS WHAT THE USDC IN OREGON AND YOU TOO, WASHINGTON USDC, STIPULATE AS "LAW" TO ACT IN BAD FAITH TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

Hard copies to follow and B.A.R. COMPLAINT, as well, the SMALL CLAIMS can't be tampered with in the filing to sue the CLIENT SECURITY 'AGENT' FOR THE B.A.R.

Roberta Kelly, 503-849-4634 

the State of Washington's COWLITZ vs. MARTIN is for your review, Mr. Bryan, a very important DUE PROCESS RULE OF LAW, after more than twenty (20) years of your B.A.R. registry.

.. to be continued ...