INTERNATIONAL BANKERS have been always about COMMUNISM ... |
[SIDEBAR: & 9 CIRCUIT, ET AL, ARTISTS ARE ALWAYS ABOUT SEEING IN THE DARKNESS, FROM THE DARK TO THE DARKEST AND, THAT'S TO BE IN THE LIGHT, TOO, THE BRIGHTEST OF THE BRIGHT IN THE ENLIGHTENMENT, WELCOME TO THE 21 CENTURY. Alex Kozinski, Federal Judge ...
 | |
Judge Kozinski recently spoke at a Stanford Law symposium, and the text of his speech has been posted online, and in it, he admits that he's not particularly adept with modern technology -- in fact, he refers to himself as a "troglodyte." However, he then goes on to talk about how modern technology is destroying our privacy -- but not because of the technology itself, or the government (even though he discusses both things), but in the way in which people themselves share all sorts of private info. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/01543418552/judge-alex-kozinski-fears-that-people-share-too-much-info-online-does-that-mean-we-give-up-all-privacy-rights.shtml |
 |
http://www.gossiprocks.com/forum/news/harvard-law-student-african-americans-genetically-pre-disposed-less-intelligent-page2-128424.html |
 |
| KAREN HUDES INTERNATIONAL LAWYER TO YOUR RESCUE ALEX ET AL |
SEE ALSO,
http://theartof12.blogspot.com/2014/05/clifford-hugh-douglas-social-credit-1.html
https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/GoldOutofHiding1.pdf
https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/85-9-6+Japan.pdf
http://observer.com/2014/06/war-on-wall-street-obama-appoints-anti-business-activist-head-of-doj-division/
http://www.voltairenet.org/article184447.html
http://www.voltairenet.org/article184422.html
“As for this Commission, it deserves to disappear. I want no more of Hallstein. I want no more of Marjolin. I want no more to do with them. … I want no more that the French government should have to do business with these types. … The problem, it is this mafia of supranationalists, whether commissioners, deputies or bureaucrats. They are all enemies. They have been put there by our enemies.”
C’était de Gaulle, Alain Peyrefitte, Fayard, Éditions de Fallois, Tome II, pp.290-291.
What would de Gaulle have thought of these projects of monetary union that Robert Marjolin discusses with his counterparts?
Can one imagine the man of 18 June [tr: 1940] giving a mandate to Robert Marjolin to advance such a project in cooperation with the USA? This is the country that he had justly denounced as the dominant force behind ‘European construction’ in his press conference of 15 May 1962, in describing the object as ‘federalist’, which ‘could not be European’.
The answer is not difficult to imagine since de Gaulle himself had indicated in a tête-à-tête with Alain Peyrefitte what he thought of Robert Marjolin and his confrères. A detail symptomatic: Marjolin had made known his secret to his Minister on Saturday morning 12 June 1965, only a few hours after the Washington meeting the evening before, and of which the Chief of the French state had probably no knowledge.
Let us return to and further explore the previous quotation for its implications.
Charles-de-Gaulle: “Hallstein has invented a ceremony of letters of credence for officials of the states in Brussels. He takes himself for the President of a supranational Government. He doesn’t even hide his agenda, which consists of replicating at the European level the federal structure of West Germany. The Commission would become the federal Government. The European Assembly would be the equivalent of the Bundestag. The Council of Ministers would become the Bundesrat, the Senate, in short! It’s laughable. But don’t deceive yourself: it involves an institutional drift that will finish by taking over if we don’t put a stop to it. And we alone have the power to do it. … As for the Commission, it won’t get him into heaven. I will have satisfaction. Hallstein, Marjolin and Mansholt [tr: Dutch, European Commissioner for Agriculture], they’re finished. I will not renew their mandates.”
Fifteen days later, during another tête-à-tête with Peyrefitte, held after the Council of Ministers’ meeting on 1 July 1965, the founder of Free France and of the Fifth Republic explodes in anger against the European Commission, and notably against Wallter Hallstein and Robert Marjolin:
“As for this Commission, it deserves to disappear. I want no more of Hallstein. I want no more of Marjolin. I want no more of Mansholt. I want no more to do with them. … It is necessary to be clear of it all. In any case, I want no more that the French government should have to do business with these types. It is finished for good. … The problem, it is this mafia of supranationalists, whether commissioners, deputies or bureaucrats. They are all enemies. They have been put there by our enemies. The Socialist buddies, with some MRP hostages, friends of Felix Gaillard [tr: Radical, Prime Minister 1957-58] and of Maurice Faure [tr: perennial Minister and fervent Europeanist]. They have spent their time in forging a state of a spirit hostile to France.”
The most important lesson arising from the original memorandum of the State Department of 11 June 1965 resides in the total political allegiance – even complicity – of the EEC Vice-President, with the US officials.
Robert Marjolin engages precisely in what has always been designated ‘friendship with a foreign power’ and an act of high treason vis-à-vis the 6 member states of the EEC in whose interests he is supposed to work, and particularly vis-à-vis his own country, France.
Finally, this memorandum, with its status of partial confidentiality, is only the visible part of the iceberg? The secret documents, written in a style certainly more direct and a cynicism surely more transparent, are still unopened.
[SIDEBAR CONTINUED Alex Kozinski, Et Al, MONEY
TRANSPARENCY AT LONG LAST. The HAVES are of course not wanting this
SECRECY outed. PRIVACY is an honorable choice, SECRECY, as what has
been since the INTERNATIONAL BANKERS DECIDED COMMUNISM, well there isn't
a better time than now to get rid of this vile evil you so wanted to be
not about either.https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/GoldOutofHiding1.pdf
https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/85-9-6+Japan.pdf
http://observer.com/2014/06/war-on-wall-street-obama-appoints-anti-business-activist-head-of-doj-division/
http://www.voltairenet.org/article184447.html
http://www.voltairenet.org/article184422.html
“As for this Commission, it deserves to disappear. I want no more of Hallstein. I want no more of Marjolin. I want no more to do with them. … I want no more that the French government should have to do business with these types. … The problem, it is this mafia of supranationalists, whether commissioners, deputies or bureaucrats. They are all enemies. They have been put there by our enemies.”
C’était de Gaulle, Alain Peyrefitte, Fayard, Éditions de Fallois, Tome II, pp.290-291.
What would de Gaulle have thought of these projects of monetary union that Robert Marjolin discusses with his counterparts?
Can one imagine the man of 18 June [tr: 1940] giving a mandate to Robert Marjolin to advance such a project in cooperation with the USA? This is the country that he had justly denounced as the dominant force behind ‘European construction’ in his press conference of 15 May 1962, in describing the object as ‘federalist’, which ‘could not be European’.
The answer is not difficult to imagine since de Gaulle himself had indicated in a tête-à-tête with Alain Peyrefitte what he thought of Robert Marjolin and his confrères. A detail symptomatic: Marjolin had made known his secret to his Minister on Saturday morning 12 June 1965, only a few hours after the Washington meeting the evening before, and of which the Chief of the French state had probably no knowledge.
Let us return to and further explore the previous quotation for its implications.
Charles-de-Gaulle: “Hallstein has invented a ceremony of letters of credence for officials of the states in Brussels. He takes himself for the President of a supranational Government. He doesn’t even hide his agenda, which consists of replicating at the European level the federal structure of West Germany. The Commission would become the federal Government. The European Assembly would be the equivalent of the Bundestag. The Council of Ministers would become the Bundesrat, the Senate, in short! It’s laughable. But don’t deceive yourself: it involves an institutional drift that will finish by taking over if we don’t put a stop to it. And we alone have the power to do it. … As for the Commission, it won’t get him into heaven. I will have satisfaction. Hallstein, Marjolin and Mansholt [tr: Dutch, European Commissioner for Agriculture], they’re finished. I will not renew their mandates.”
Fifteen days later, during another tête-à-tête with Peyrefitte, held after the Council of Ministers’ meeting on 1 July 1965, the founder of Free France and of the Fifth Republic explodes in anger against the European Commission, and notably against Wallter Hallstein and Robert Marjolin:
“As for this Commission, it deserves to disappear. I want no more of Hallstein. I want no more of Marjolin. I want no more of Mansholt. I want no more to do with them. … It is necessary to be clear of it all. In any case, I want no more that the French government should have to do business with these types. It is finished for good. … The problem, it is this mafia of supranationalists, whether commissioners, deputies or bureaucrats. They are all enemies. They have been put there by our enemies. The Socialist buddies, with some MRP hostages, friends of Felix Gaillard [tr: Radical, Prime Minister 1957-58] and of Maurice Faure [tr: perennial Minister and fervent Europeanist]. They have spent their time in forging a state of a spirit hostile to France.”
The most important lesson arising from the original memorandum of the State Department of 11 June 1965 resides in the total political allegiance – even complicity – of the EEC Vice-President, with the US officials.
Robert Marjolin engages precisely in what has always been designated ‘friendship with a foreign power’ and an act of high treason vis-à-vis the 6 member states of the EEC in whose interests he is supposed to work, and particularly vis-à-vis his own country, France.
Finally, this memorandum, with its status of partial confidentiality, is only the visible part of the iceberg? The secret documents, written in a style certainly more direct and a cynicism surely more transparent, are still unopened.
I know you agree with KARL MARX who said COOPERATION & COMMUNICATION & NOT COMMUNISM. Communism was written via the INTERNATIONAL BANKERS that used the famous name of Marx because he wrote ANTI CAPITALISM for why the bell doth toll now.
Ann L. Aiken and ITS' CULT OF METZITZAH B'PEH ARE NOT EXACTLY 'SANE' IN THE LEADERSHIP REALITY OR WE WOULD NOT BE HERE TODAY HAVING THIS EMAIL AND POST BLOG REALITY.
UNITED STATES COURTS 'CHIEF JUSTICES' HAVE A LOT OF EXPLAINING TO DO ABOUT HOW CAN THIS LEVEL OF COMPETENCE BE REACHED IN THE MOST INCOMPETENT LEVEL OF 'HOMO SAPIENS'
ReplyDelete