NOAM CHOMP-SKY: ALWAYS BITING OFF LOTS TO CHEW ON, SPIT OUT THE DAMN PUKE PABLUM NOW!

BLAH BLAH BLAH CHOMP THE TRUTH FOR A CHANGE MR. NOAM NO REALITY OTHER THAN PABLUM BULL SHIT FOREVER AND EVER, YOU KNOW HOW "THE CHOSEN" LIVE ALRIGHT!  ASK RUTH BADER GINSBURG ABOUT THE REAL TRUTH, AND THEN WE CAN EVOLVE CHOMSKY TO BE WITH KAREN HUDES' IN THE REAL NAME "JEWRY"~ANTI-POLITICAL!!!

http://rt.com/usa/198932-un-chomsky-us-israel/

Let me make this real easy on you, Mr. Pryhozen. Let's just say that you represent the very best England has to offer the world. Me? I am still wiping the gunk off me after being freed the real Matrix. Never mind me. Let me ask you a question that every decent, self-respecting (YouTube watching) Russian knows the answer to. Did the United States of America land a man on the Moon in 1969? You see, this "debate" isn't about Noam Chomsky. It's about the truth, and who has the right to speak the voice of truth for the United States dissidents who have found a refuge from the Matrix on RT.com. Noam forfeited that right when he attacked us and averred that Islamic terrorists and not the Bush administration orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. Now before you show your real colors, let me just say that any decent, self-respecting (YouTube watching) NYC fireman will tell you those building were deliberately demolished. So have at it, Mr. Pryhozen. Where do yo stand? For or against the Big Lie? For or against Noam Chomsky? Because Bush had one thing right. Either you are for us, or you are against us. Noam is the latter.

I don't consider myself married to all Noam Chomsky's opinions. I happen to agree with his opinion on American support for Israel. I disagree with him on 9/11. I believe that there was a conspiracy, but what we consider a federal government did not stage it. It was designed by non-constitutional centers of power and carried out with the help of government officials. The fact is, there is no solid evidence to prove it. All the technical details, even though solid in scientific aspect, are a circumstantial evidence in legal sense. Chomsky is not an engineer, architect, or a physicist, so he could not use his expertise to support the conspiracy. My personal opinion is that he fell victim to the thinking, which is the first principle of the false flag operations' manual. That's all. Man on the Moon issue is of no significance for me.