Talk about a no-brainer!
The $2.5-trillion Social Security Trust Fund, which current workers, including the much-maligned Baby Boom generation, have been bulking up with our 6.2% payroll tax and the 6.2% that our employers have to pay, is slated to be exhausted by 2036-8. Unless more money is injected into the system to cover the tsunami of retirees born between 1946 and 1964, the program, if it were just running on current payroll taxes, would only be able to cover 75% of promised benefits to current retirees.
At the same time, the rich are getting richer every year, and the rest of us poorer.
Income tax rates for the rich are far lower now than they were in the 1990s, ‘80s or in any prior decade. Meanwhile loopholes and deductions and exemptions for the wealthy keep getting added to the tax code to help make them richer. (Those rich enough to be able to use the Schedule A tax form get to claim all mortgage interest, including for vacation homes. They get to deduct the cost of fancy insurance plans and pricy medical care, they get to deduct their state and local taxes, and they get taxed much less than even a low-income wage-earner on income they earn from investments.)
Everyone, except the rich themselves of course, agrees that the widening wealth gap in the US (now about the same as in Jamaica and Argentina) is a terrible thing, and everyone agrees that something needs to be done to keep Social Security well-funded.
What isn’t being said is that the two problems are linked and can be at least partially solved simultaneously.
Think about it: As things stand, only the first $113,400 of wage income is subject to the Social Security tax -- the so-called FICA tax. Even if you earn $2 million or $200 million a year, you still only pay that 6.2% FICA tax on the first $113,400 of it--a maximum tax of $7,030.80 per person or $14,061.60 for employee and employer.
If the cap were eliminated, as was done long ago for the Medicare tax, so that the rich and their employers -- or rich people themselves if they are self-employed -- had to pay the full 12.4% tax on their income, almost all of the shortfall in the Social Security Trust Fund’s ability to pay for the retirement benefits of the Baby Boomers and subsequent retirees would be eliminated. If, beyond that, investment income was also made subject to the Social Security tax, either as a straight percentage of profits, or as a small 0.25% to 0.5% tax on stock and bond transactions, not only would the entire shortfall be gone, but there would be money to do what an increasing number of Americans are saying must be done: increase retirement benefits. http://thiscantbehappening.net/node/2066
Being wrongly denied benefits is not only disheartening, it can feel completely overwhelming.
With everything else going on in your life, trying to figure out what to do next can seem like a monumental task.If your initial claim was denied, it’s important to remember three things:
FIRST, don’t lose heart! Most initial claims are denied. This doesn’t mean you don’t deserve your benefits. It just means the government wants you to better prove your case.
SECOND, don’t wait too long! You only have 60 days to appeal your case. It’s important that you begin the process of appeal as soon as possible.
FINALLY, you do need help. When you’re asked to prove something in a legal setting, it’s critical that you enlist the aid of a qualified legal advocate.Elizabeth Warren’s law practice is exclusively dedicated to winning Social Security Disability and SSI claims. She knows the ins and outs of the system. And she understands what her clients are going through and how much receiving these benefits means for their health and well-being. Whether you’re at the very beginning of the application process and are uncertain what to do next, or need to appeal your claim’s denial, we invite you to see how Elizabeth’s expertise can work for you.
Read our response to 60 Minutes Show on 10-6-13
U.S. SENATOR WARREN, POTUS#45 2016!
ReplyDelete