[sidebar: Great American ~ Luther Burbank ~ warned NOT to keep the 'MEDICAL' as a way to keep the humans alive that could not be alive absent 'FAKE science'. But, the MONEY in Medicine is and has been TOO TEMPTING to not use the human being as nothing but, experimental 'science' for the obvious KILLING MASS HUMANS.
IT, technology, HOUSES OF WESTERN ANGLO-SAXON CRIMINALLY INSANE, thought that owning DIGITAL FRAUD could fool all the billions of humans, when the reality is, stupid humans can't figure out the species is one.
Thus, time to find new 'leader' brains that haven't practiced METZITZAH B'PEH as the ways and means to make the species (IE EG "JEW") a complete blubbering pile of blood diseased and thus, brain dead in essence.
OH COME ALL YE FAITHFUL, come now see the Genocidal Tyrants for exactly what they are -- THEY-THEM-THOSE all known via the contempt for being human, Agenda 21 so called new world order.
Leaders? HILLBILLIES CLINTON fully indoctrinated and therefore, the choice for POTUS2016, after the current "We Will Rebuild" POTUS-FLOTUS#44]
Download the UN Documents Mentioned in the Videos
Which Organization in the United States is the prime-mover behind this?
Which Family in the United States is the prime-mover behind all this?
“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” — Memoirs, 2002, pg. 405, ch. Proud Internationalist; Chairman The Council on Foreign Relations; Chairman Emeritus Chase bank, link1 for full context , link2 for full context , link3 for full context , link4 for full context
“Ironically however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems which raise the spectre of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to the biosphere we live in. And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health, has caused the world’s infant mortality rate to decline by 60 percent over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world’s average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 1950s to 63 years today. This is a development which as individuals we can only applaud. However the result of these positive measures is that the world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6 billion people, and can exceed easily 8 billion by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary eco-systems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid growing exploitation of the world’s supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern. And the toxic by products of widespread industrialization and increased atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth over consumption of resources and environmental degradation, prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focussed on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing the world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is of course an inevitable corollary of a growing population, and is essential to improved standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment two years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth, and global development. [Agenda 21] It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations can certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.” — David Rockefeller, Annual UN Ambassadors’ Dinner Sep 14, 1994,link for full context
Which Family in Europe is the prime-mover behind all this?
“We (the House of Rothschild) provide advice on both sides of the balance sheet, and we do it globally. … We have had 250 years or so of family involvement in the finance business, … There is no debate that Rothschild is a Jewish family, … For a family business to survive, every generation needs a leader, … Then somebody has to keep the peace. Building a global firm before globalisation meant a mindset of sharing risk and responsibility. If you look at the DNA of our family, that is perhaps an element that runs through our history.” — Baron David de Rothschild, The first barons of banking by Rupert Wright, UAE thenational.ae, November 6, 2008, link for full context: The Invisible House of Rothschild By Zahir Ebrahim
Is there any respectable name that you can cite who agrees with your take on matters?
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited.” — Arnold Toynbee, The Trend of International Affairs Since the War, International Affairs, November 1931, pg. 809, link for full context: The Poor-Man’s Guide to Modernity By Zahir Ebrahim, 6th Edition
But that’s only a dead historian you cite — how about someone living, who is also part of officialdom and shares these insane notions?
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” — Strobe Talbot, Former President Bill Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, 1992, link1 for full context
“We are living through exceptionally difficult times. Financial crisis and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis which threatens our very survival — a period of anxiety, uncertainty, and lack of confidence. Yet these problems can be overcome, by a joint effort, in and between our countries. 2009 is also the first year of Global Governance with the establishment of the G-20 in the middle of financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the Global Management of our Planet. Our mission, our presidency is one of hope, supported by acts, and by deeds.” — Herman Van Rompuy, EU Council President, press conference Nov 19, 2009, op.cit.
Source URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/agenda-21-for-dummies/
Agenda 21 for Dummies