[sidebar:
Great American ~ Luther Burbank ~ warned NOT to keep the 'MEDICAL' as a way to keep the
humans alive that could not be alive absent 'FAKE science'. But,
the MONEY in Medicine is and has been TOO TEMPTING to not use the human
being as nothing but, experimental 'science' for the obvious KILLING
MASS HUMANS.
IT, technology, HOUSES OF WESTERN ANGLO-SAXON CRIMINALLY
INSANE, thought that owning DIGITAL FRAUD could fool all the billions of humans, when the reality is, stupid humans can't figure out the species is one.
Thus, time to find new 'leader' brains that haven't practiced METZITZAH B'PEH as the ways and means to make the species (IE EG "JEW") a complete blubbering pile of blood diseased and thus, brain dead in essence.
OH COME ALL YE FAITHFUL, come now see the Genocidal Tyrants for exactly what they are -- THEY-THEM-THOSE all known via the contempt for being human, Agenda 21 so called new world order.
Leaders? HILLBILLIES CLINTON fully indoctrinated and therefore, the choice for POTUS2016, after the current "We Will Rebuild" POTUS-FLOTUS#44]
Download the UN Documents Mentioned in the Videos
Which Organization in the United States is the prime-mover behind this?
Which Family in the United States is the prime-mover behind all this?
“Some
even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal
working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing
my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others
around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I
stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” — Memoirs, 2002, pg. 405, ch. Proud Internationalist; Chairman The Council on Foreign Relations; Chairman Emeritus Chase bank, link1 for full context , link2 for full context , link3 for full context , link4 for full context
“Ironically
however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic
improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems which
raise the spectre of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to
the biosphere we live in. And herein lies the dilemma that we all face.
Let me illustrate. Improved public health, has caused the world’s infant
mortality rate to decline by 60 percent over the last 40 years. In the
same period, the world’s average life expectancy has increased from 46
years in 1950s to 63 years today. This is a development which as
individuals we can only applaud. However the result of these positive
measures is that the world population that has risen during the same
short period of time geometrically to almost 6 billion people, and can
exceed easily 8 billion by the year 2020. The negative impact of
population growth on all of our planetary eco-systems is becoming
appallingly evident. The rapid growing exploitation of the world’s
supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern. And the toxic by
products of widespread industrialization and increased atmospheric
pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work
together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population
growth over consumption of resources and environmental degradation,
prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent
UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focussed on one of these key
issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at
the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues
that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The
United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the
world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing the world population and
stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to
religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is of course an
inevitable corollary of a growing population, and is essential to
improved standards of living. But without careful coordination,
unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment.
This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de
Janeiro on the environment two years ago. The focus then was on
sustainable growth, and global development. [Agenda 21] It was pointed
out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the
private sector, but regulation of the process by national governments
and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations
can certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.” — David Rockefeller, Annual UN Ambassadors’ Dinner Sep 14, 1994,link for full context
Which Family in Europe is the prime-mover behind all this?
“We
(the House of Rothschild) provide advice on both sides of the balance
sheet, and we do it globally. … We have had 250 years or so of family
involvement in the finance
business, … There is no debate that Rothschild is a Jewish family, …
For a family business to survive, every generation needs a leader, …
Then somebody has to keep the peace. Building a global firm before
globalisation meant a mindset of sharing risk and responsibility. If you
look at the DNA of our family, that is perhaps an element that runs
through our history.” — Baron David de Rothschild, The first barons of banking by Rupert Wright, UAE thenational.ae, November 6, 2008, link for full context: The Invisible House of Rothschild By Zahir Ebrahim
Is there any respectable name that you can cite who agrees with your take on matters?
“We
are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this
mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local
nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips
what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of
the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a
statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but
certainly be ostracized or discredited.” — Arnold Toynbee, The Trend of International Affairs Since the War, International Affairs, November 1931, pg. 809, link for full context: The Poor-Man’s Guide to Modernity By Zahir Ebrahim, 6th Edition
But
that’s only a dead historian you cite — how about someone living, who
is also part of officialdom and shares these insane notions?
“In
the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states
will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t
such a great idea after all.” — Strobe Talbot, Former President Bill Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, 1992, link1 for full context
“We are living through exceptionally difficult times. Financial
crisis and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate
crisis which threatens our very survival — a period of anxiety,
uncertainty, and lack of confidence. Yet these problems can be overcome,
by a joint effort, in and between our countries. 2009 is also the first year of Global Governance with the establishment of the G-20 in the middle of financial crisis.
The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the Global
Management of our Planet. Our mission, our presidency is one of hope,
supported by acts, and by deeds.” — Herman Van Rompuy, EU Council President, press conference Nov 19, 2009, op.cit.
Source URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/agenda-21-for-dummies/
Agenda 21 for Dummies
2009, World Government began ITS' rearing of a very ugly MULTI-HEADED MONSTER, Russia-China-Et Al DECIDED HOUSES of Rothschild (Rots-child) and Rockefeller (Got-Rocks), was also FAMILY. and, the RACE IS PASSING HUMANS INTO THE STATE OF OBLIVION. Time for Real Change and not the loose stuff dangling in digital fraud global initiatives.
ReplyDelete